Offsetting perceptions: Firms use charitable giving to clean up their international reputation

Apr 02, 2009

British multinationals operating in countries that lack basic human rights give around 70% more money to charity than firms that do not have a presence in such politically controversial nations, a new study has revealed.

The findings support the growing body of research suggesting that corporate charitable giving plays an important strategic role for many businesses.

In a study looking at the charitable donations of 305 UK plcs, comprising around half of FTSE All-Share Index companies, analysts found that a corporate presence in one or more countries in which political rights and civil liberties are curtailed pushed up the average level of donations from £1.148m to £1.977m.

Writing in the Journal of Management Studies, the researchers suggest that this increased philanthropy could be seen as an attempt to "offset" negative connotations related to the companies' operations in controversial countries such as China, Burma, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

"The positive impact on charitable giving is restricted to a presence in only those countries that are most lacking in political rights and civil liberties," said Dr Stephen Pavelin, of Henley Business School, UK, part of the team who carried out the research. "Our findings suggest that companies are seeking to offset negative impressions in the eyes of the public that arise from doing business in such countries by making greater gifts to charity."

The study drew information from the companies' annual reports from 2002 and looked at presence in 'countries of concern', as defined by criteria established by the FTSE4Good Index - which aims to identify environmentally and socially responsible companies - as well as indicators of political rights, civil liberties and corruption derived from research by the independent organisations Freedom House and Transparency International.

Unable to separate out corporate giving by country, the team could not determine whether the higher levels of charitable donations were directed towards projects in the UK or in the host countries themselves. "This finding is perhaps indicative of relatively token responses to corporate exposure to political and civil rights issues, rather than significant attempts to address or atone for these issues through giving aimed at impacted communities," said Dr Pavelin.

While political and civil rights issues were shown to stimulate charitable donations, level of corruption did not have a similar effect. "It appears that the salient feature of a country in this connection is a lack of political rights and/or civil liberties, rather than a presence of high levels of corruption," said Dr Pavelin.

No evidence was found of a link between money donated to charity and the fact that firms operated in a number of different countries. Multinationals make similar contributions to their 'uni-national' counterparts, the study found.

"It is clear that the characteristics of the countries within which companies operate play a more significant role in shaping corporate social performance than the degree of internationalisation per se," said Dr Pavelin.

Source: Wiley (news : web)

Explore further: Best of Last Week – quantum pigeonholing, a hoverbike drone project and the sun goes quiet

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Transparency in politics can lead to greater corruption

Oct 10, 2008

Why are some countries more prone to political corruption? Viviana Stechina from Uppsala University, Sweden, has investigated why corruption among the political elite was more extensive in Argentina than in Chile during ...

Corporate social responsibility: less profit, more value

Feb 07, 2008

Companies that operate in a socially responsible manner 'pay' for this with a loss in financial profit. Yet at the same time, socially responsible business practices can enhance a company's value. Dutch economist Lammertjan ...

Cooperation, punishment and revenge

Mar 06, 2008

Research from The University of Nottingham has shed new light on the way in which people co-operate for the common good — and what happens when they don’t.

Recommended for you

How to win a Tour de France sprint

Jul 22, 2014

The final dash to the line in a Tour de France sprint finish may appear to the bystander to be a mess of bodies trying to cram into the width of a road, but there is a high degree of strategy involved. It ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

WarRoom
not rated yet Apr 02, 2009
Wow, that's why corporate philanthropy is nothing more than marketing BS. Why do people believe that a corporation can actually have good intentions?