Research synthesis shines light on several management options after fires in diverse ecosystems

Mar 20, 2009

No single decision-support system exists for selecting alternatives for postfire management. That thesis is what a recently released report on management after fire hinges upon. The publication, Effects of Timber Harvest Following Wildfire in Western North America, tells us that the type of forest landscape determines the ways fire and logging may change an area after a wildfire. The authors, however, hope that public land managers will use the publication to evaluate postfire management options.

The publication's lead author, David Peterson, a biological scientist with the Forest Service's Pacific Northwest Research Station, says that after reading this report, managers will understand several principles pertaining to postfire .

"First," explains Peterson, "each and management situation is different, and should be evaluated with respect to local soils, vegetation, hydrology, and wildlife—there is no standard formula. Second, if postfire is conducted, the sooner it can be done after the , the fewer the negative effects and the higher the value of the wood. And finally, it's critical to consider postfire logging in the context of the entire landscape of the wildfire to minimize the potential effects of logging."

The authors define several principles about the effects of postfire timber harvest on most landscape:

• Logging can kill naturally regenerating if the soil is disturbed after the trees have been established.

• Crown fire reduces the probability of future fire for years to decades.

• Fire and logging—separately or combined—affect soil properties.

• Severe, large, fires reduce water uptakes by vegetation, causing streamflow to increase and water quality to decrease.

• Short-term effects of removing trees near aquatic systems are mostly negative.

• Most cavity-nesting birds and other animals that live in cavities are impacted by the harvesting of large standing dead trees.

"There has been a lot of controversy about salvage logging over the past decade," says Peterson. "We want to ensure that the most recent scientific information is available for making decisions and determining the value and effects of harvesting trees following wildfire."

Source: USDA Forest Service

Explore further: New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Probing Question: Can logging be done sustainably?

Apr 03, 2008

In an era of ever-increasing environmental awareness, few industries receive more scrutiny than logging. For decades, environmental groups have claimed that commercial logging practices result in devastating consequences, ...

Beetle dung helps forests recover from fire

Nov 29, 2007

Armed with a pair of tweezers and a handful of beetle droppings, University of Alberta forestry graduate Tyler Cobb has discovered why the bug-sized dung is so important to areas ravaged by fire.

Recommended for you

New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

3 hours ago

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's ...

Coal gas boom in China holds climate change risks

7 hours ago

Deep in the hilly grasslands of remote Inner Mongolia, twin smoke stacks rise more than 200 feet into the sky, their steam and sulfur billowing over herds of sheep and cattle. Both day and night, the rumble ...

User comments : 0