Alcohol: minimum pricing could decrease consumption, while increasing industry revenue by 68%

Mar 12, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A leading Scottish health economist will today present new data which will show that the alcohol industry in Scotland could experience an increase in revenue even if the Scottish Government's proposals to introduce a minimum price per unit of alcohol in Scotland resulted in a 30% reduction in consumption of low priced alcohol products.

Prof Anne Ludbrook, of the Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, will be speaking at a major conference convened by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh and the Faculty of examining evidence-based public health measures in the areas of , smoking and diet.

Minimum pricing for a unit of alcohol has proven to be one of the most controversial measures contained with the Scottish Government's recent proposals to reduce excessive . In particular, the alcohol industry and retailers' representative bodies have claimed that the introduction of minimum pricing would adversely affect their sales.

Prof Ludbrook has analysed the impact of introducing a per unit of alcohol sold in Scotland using a hypothetical example. If a minimum price of 30p per unit of alcohol was introduced (equivalent to a minimum price of 68p per pint for beer), the alcohol industry could actually experience a 68% increase in revenue whilst selling 30% less of heavily discounted products (reduced alcohol consumption being the aim of this policy measure).

How does this work?

Analysis of price components

Discounted (offer) priceMinimum price* 23p per unit of alcohol

* 52p per pint (equivalent)

- Duty 35p

- VAT 7p

- Industry 10p- 30p per unit of alcohol

- 68p per pint (equivalent)

- Duty 35p

- VAT 9p

- Industry 24p

Effect on revenue/sales

Discounted (offer) priceMinimum price* Assume 100 pints sold at offer price

(above)

* revenue - *52.00

- Duty *35.00

- VAT *7.00

- Industry *10.00- assume only 70 pints are sold at higher

price (above)

- revenue - *47.60

- Duty *24.50

- VAT *6.30

- Industry *16.80

Prof Anne Ludbrook, Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, said,

"The introduction of a minimum price for a unit of alcohol has recently been proposed by the Scottish Government as a means of reducing alcohol consumption and, in turn, alcohol-related harm. It is a controversial measure which has, in particular, been contested by the alcohol industry and retailers who believe that this would result in a decrease in revenue for them.

"There is strong evidence that higher prices would reduce alcohol consumption. Minimum pricing is one means of raising prices and my analysis has shown that this could be more beneficial to the industry than the traditional approach of increasing duty. If a minimum price of 30p per unit was introduced, then a product which is currently heavily discounted might experience up to a 30% decrease in sales. However, industry revenue could actually increase by as much as 68% because most of the price increase is retained by the industry. Duty per pint is fixed and VAT takes only 15% of the price increase. Therefore, minimum pricing could achieve a public health gain due to reduced consumption and the decrease in profits forecast by industry and retailers would not materialise. This would be a win-win situation"

Prof Harry Campbell, from the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (and Professor of Public Health, University of Edinburgh), said,

"In recent years Scotland has experienced significant public health problems caused by excessive alcohol consumption, smoking and poor diet. In order to ensure that future public health policy is informed by best scientific evidence, we have convened this event to examine what measures are likely to be most successful in tackling Scotland's appalling health record. We will look at examples of ways in which evidence can be used to inform public health policy and in some cases to allay misperceptions regarding the impact of such policy measures."

Provided by University of Aberdeen (news : web)

Explore further: US hotels don't understand Chinese tourists, study says

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Report finds extensive use of illicit alcohol

Nov 19, 2008

The consumption of illicit or noncommercial alcohol is widespread in many countries worldwide and contributes significantly to the global burden of disease, according to a new report released today by the International Center ...

A Drink to Healthy Aging

Dec 13, 2007

Researchers at the University of Newcastle say a glass of wine a day may be of benefit to the health of older women.

Study: Regulate alcohol marketing

May 02, 2006

The U.S. alcohol industry snares too many underage drinkers and its marketing practices should be federally regulated, a Columbia University study concludes.

Alcohol taxes have clear effect on drinking

Jan 15, 2009

With many local and national governments currently debating proposals to raise alcohol taxes, a timely new study published online today in the February edition of Addiction journal finds that the more alcoholic beverages cost, ...

Sunday alcohol sales cause crash rise

Oct 09, 2006

A New Mexico study has found that alcohol-related car crash deaths have risen 49 percent since the state repealed a law prohibiting alcohol sales on Sundays.

Recommended for you

Marcellus drilling boom may have led to too many hotel rooms

Sep 18, 2014

Drilling in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale region led to a rapid increase in both the number of hotels and hotel industry jobs, but Penn State researchers report that the faltering occupancy rate may signal that there are ...

Entrepreneurs aren't overconfident gamblers

Sep 17, 2014

Leaving one's job to become an entrepreneur is inarguably risky. But it may not be the fear of risk that makes entrepreneurs more determined to succeed. A new study finds entrepreneurs are also concerned about what they might ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonnyboy
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 15, 2009
The Professor should go back to his professoring and leave the drinking to those of us qualified to drink.