New stars from old gas surprise astronomers

Feb 18, 2009
New stars from old gas surprise astronomers
An area of Leo Ring gas cloud (blue overlay) shows blue clumps (in circles) that likely represent the ultraviolet emissions of dwarf galaxies in the process of formation. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/DSS.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Evidence of star birth within a cloud of primordial gas has given astronomers a glimpse of a previously unknown mode of galaxy formation. The cloud, known as the Leo Ring, appears to lack the dark matter and heavy elements normally found in galaxies today. The unexpected discovery comes thanks to instruments aboard NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) spacecraft which are sensitive to the ultraviolet radiation emitted by newly formed stars.

The team, led by astronomer David Thilker of Johns Hopkins University, included Barry Madore and Mark Seibert of the Carnegie Observatories. "This demonstrates the tremendous power of observing the ultraviolet from space," said Seibert. "By discovering star formation in what is likely a new class of dwarf galaxy the Galaxy Evolution Explorer observatory is certainly living up to its name."

The Leo Ring, discovered in 1983 by radio astronomers, is a cloud of hydrogen and helium gas orbiting two galaxies in the constellation Leo. The cloud is nearly invisible in optical wavelengths, and since its discovery astronomers had searched for stars within it without success. The launch of the GALEX spacecraft in 2003 with ultra-sensitive UV detectors has made it possible to explore new wavelengths and detect ultraviolet emissions from the cloud's star-forming regions, which the astronomers interpret to be small galaxies known as dwarf galaxies.

The unique ultraviolet vision of NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer reveals, for the first time, dwarf galaxies forming out of nothing more than pristine gas likely leftover from the early universe. Dwarf galaxies are relatively small collections of stars that often orbit around larger galaxies like our Milky Way. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/DSS

Previous measurements of the masses and velocities of clumps of hydrogen within the Leo Ring suggest it lacks any significant dark matter component, an aspect that distinguishes these newly discovered sites of star formation from other known dwarf galaxies. Since in current cosmological models galaxies form in association with a massive "halo" of dark matter, this suggests that the new galaxies formed through a distinct and not yet understood process.

Given the immense size of the Leo Ring it is unlikely that the gas comprising it has been cycled through or extracted from the central galaxies. It is conceivable that this gas has been untouched since the beginning of the Universe. If so, the newly formed dwarf galaxies could be almost pure hydrogen and helium and lack heavier elements ("metals" in astronomical terminology). The Leo Ring and its newly discovered ultraviolet dwarf galaxies would then provide astronomers with a nearby opportunity to see how galaxy formation probably proceeded in the very early Universe.

The new type of dwarf galaxy may have been common in the early Universe, when clouds of pristine gas would have been more abundant. The discovery opens a window on the process of star formation in primordial gases not yet enriched with heavy elements.

"The next phase is to follow up these objects with deep imaging and spectroscopy from the ground," said Carnegie astronomer Barry Madore, who is a co-author on the paper and a co-investigator on the GALEX mission.

"An observing run on Carnegie's 6.5m Baade telescope is already scheduled for this spring."

The paper appears in the February 19, 2009 issue of the journal Nature.

Provided by Carnegie Institution

Explore further: Gas cloud in the galactic centre is part of a larger gas streamer

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Studying the physics of galaxies

Nov 03, 2014

Assistant Professor of Astronomy Evan Kirby arrived on campus in August. Born and raised in New Orleans, Kirby earned his BS in 2004 from Stanford University; his undergraduate thesis involved trips to Pasadena ...

Modified theory of dark matter

Sep 12, 2014

Dark matter is an aspect of the universe we still don't fully understand. We have lots of evidence pointing to its existence (as I outlined in a series of posts a while back), and the best evidence we have point ...

Recommended for you

Image: Hubble captures the Egg Nebula

8 hours ago

This colourful image shows a cosmic lighthouse known as the Egg Nebula, which lies around 3000 light-years from Earth. The image, taken with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, has captured a brief but dramatic ...

'Blockbuster' science images

Nov 21, 2014

At this point, the blockbuster movie Interstellar has created such a stir that one would almost have to be inside a black hole not to know about it. And while the science fiction thriller may have taken some ...

Estimating the magnetic field of an exoplanet

Nov 20, 2014

Scientists developed a new method which allows to estimate the magnetic field of a distant exoplanet, i.e., a planet, which is located outside the Solar system and orbits a different star. Moreover, they ...

It's filamentary: How galaxies evolve in the cosmic web

Nov 20, 2014

How do galaxies like our Milky Way form, and just how do they evolve? Are galaxies affected by their surrounding environment? An international team of researchers, led by astronomers at the University of ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

eldowan
3 / 5 (5) Feb 18, 2009
So we are back to the idea that dark matter isn't required for galaxy formation.

Huh. Imagine that.
brant
3 / 5 (3) Feb 18, 2009
They have no clue as to how galaxies or stars form. That is becoming more and more obvious everyday.
yep
2 / 5 (4) Feb 18, 2009
Not a surprise at all If you believe in the Electric universe
http://www.electr...iagr.htm
Adriab
3.5 / 5 (2) Feb 19, 2009
Astronomy has a lot of theories that go like this:
"Maybe this is how it happens..."
After more observations:
"No, no, that doesn't make sense, back to the drawing board."

That makes things rather frustrating at times, but still pretty exciting. Too bad this article says little more than "we thought we knew how things worked, but now we don't"
yyz
5 / 5 (2) Feb 19, 2009
If these dwarf galaxies formed from truly primordial gas, might their stars be representative of the long-sought Population III stars? Spectroscopic & photometric follow-up of these nearby, DM-less systems should prove interesting( starting with the Magellan observations noted in the article). There does seem to be some wiggle room in the press release( That the Leo Ring MIGHT be comprised of unprocessed primordial gas & previous observations SUGGEST that there is little DM in the Leo Ring ). Obviously these assertions must be scrutinized with follow up observations. But this announcement, if confirmed, should be of great interest to astronomers studying Dark Matter and those who study galaxy formation. BTW, anyone have a link to the full paper published in Nature?
yyz
5 / 5 (2) Feb 19, 2009
Oops, read Baade observations for 'Magellan observations'.
Damon_Hastings
5 / 5 (2) Feb 21, 2009
They have no clue as to how galaxies or stars form. That is becoming more and more obvious everyday.


How do you get that from this article? This article is talking about the discovery of a previously unseen, rare mode of galaxy formation. How does that invalidate our existing model of the more common type of formation?

No one ever said that galaxies can't form without dark matter; only that *modern* galaxy formation almost always involves dark matter. I mean, of course primordial galaxies formed largely without dark matter, since the dark matter had not yet coagulated! We've always known this. We just weren't able to *observe* such a galaxy... until now.

Likewise, the primordial stars in the early universe are believed to have been very different (and far, far larger) than modern stars. We have yet to observe a primordial type star... but that doesn't mean we think they can't exist. If we ever manage to observe one, will you then be saying that this proves we know nothing about star formation?
yep
1 / 5 (2) Feb 22, 2009
"Examples that falsify (disprove) The accepted stellar Evolution Process"
http://www.electr...iagr.htm
jamesrm
1 / 5 (1) Feb 22, 2009
"The current picture is that galaxies form inside of dark matter halos," Diemand told New Scientist. The dark matter's gravity attracts ordinary gas, which can then coagulate into stars.

"It is unclear how one would form a galaxy without a dark halo, or how one could remove the halo without destroying the galaxy," says Diemand. "A galaxy without dark matter really does not fit into our current understanding of cosmology and galaxy formation."
http://www.newsci.../dn13280

Regards
James

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.