Vital climate change warnings are being ignored, say experts in Science

Feb 12, 2009

Canada's inland waters, the countless lakes and reservoirs across the country, are important "sentinels" for climate change and Ottawa and the provinces are ignoring the warnings. That's the message from University of Alberta biologist David Schindler and colleagues in a paper to be released Feb. 12, 2009, in the prestigious publication, Science.

Schindler is a co-author of Sentinels of Change, which reviewed papers addressing the effects of climate change revealed in numerous long-term studies presented at a conference last September.

In his paper, Schindler highlighted studies that have shown that Canada and the United States will have to rethink plans to use the Laurentian Great Lakes as an emergency water supply if a dramatic shortage befalls North America in the future. Data collected by researchers indicate the water balance is the Laurentian Great Lakes is precarious because it is only renewing itself at the rate of less than one per cent a year.

Schindler and his co-authors also analyze a study involving carbon emissions. "Recent studies show that lakes release very high releases of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, in many cases higher than the surrounding forests in the same watersheds. This has been missed in climate modeling to date."

Schindler says more inland water studies are needed in Canada because they provide valuable data on water levels, carbon cycles, acid rain and the frequency of forest fires. There are three long-term inland water studies in Canada, all of them in Ontario. Schindler is calling for more funding and expansion of the research program.

Source: University of Alberta

Explore further: Researchers connect climate change to food safety

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Last look at Sentinel-2A

Feb 25, 2015

Before Sentinel-2A is packed up and shipped to French Guiana for its launch targeted on 12 June, media representatives and specialists got one last look at the second satellite for Europe's Copernicus programme.

Extreme science in the Arctic

Feb 25, 2015

A research team from Northwestern University was dropped by helicopter in the desolate wilderness of Greenland with four weeks of provisions and the goal of collecting ancient specimens preserved in Arctic lakebeds.

Disappearing lakes stoke megafauna debate

Feb 25, 2015

New research into central Australia's ancient lakes has found evidence that climate change contributed to the extinction of the continent's megafauna.

Fighting invasive species in Michigan's lakes

Feb 25, 2015

Everyone knows that clean water is important. But for the state of Michigan, surrounded on three sides by the Great Lakes, it is absolutely essential—to the economy and the environment. That's why the research being done ...

Recommended for you

Researchers connect climate change to food safety

1 hour ago

Climate change can affect our food safety in a number of ways. In a European study, researchers at Wageningen University and Ghent University (Belgium) state that there is often a relationship between long-term changes in ...

Shale gas in doubt in UK's low-carbon transition

2 hours ago

Academics from Warwick Business School and University College London have published an opinion piece based on research funded by the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) advising policymakers that, because of continuing economic, ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

GrayMouser
5 / 5 (2) Feb 12, 2009
Change is good.
Arkaleus
5 / 5 (2) Feb 13, 2009
I move that we immediately remove all public money from IPCC and all other climate researchers who cannot demostrate an accurate model from which they have based all their dire predictions.

If that models cannot pass qualitative and quantitative tests against real world observations, then their grants should be terminated.

We have already seen serious failures of their models, yet they have not changed their conslusions and publications. It seems no matter what the evidence is, the conslusions uniformly express an urgent crisis, all of which require immediate and drastic monetary and legal restrictions on human activity.

I reject the claims of crisis as unjustified, and I reject the political aims of these groups as harmful and contrary to the public good of our nations.

We need calm, rational, open debate of evidence and a baseline of understanding that includes the need of human beings to live on planet earth and to accept the changes of nature as a natural process and a continuum that we must adapt to.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.