Nanotech in your vitamins

Jan 14, 2009

The ability of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the safety of dietary supplements using nanomaterials is severely limited by lack of information, lack of resources and the agency's lack of statutory authority in certain critical areas, according to a new expert report released by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN).

The report, A Hard Pill To Swallow: Barriers to Effective FDA Regulation of Nanotechnology-Based Dietary Supplements, details the main problems at FDA in regulating nano-enabled dietary supplements and offers a host of recommendations for improving oversight of such products.

"Historically, the regulation of dietary supplements has been a significant challenge for FDA, and the fact that some of those products are now being manufactured using nanotechnology creates an additional layer of complexity," says William B. Schultz, a co-author of the report and a former FDA official.

Little is known about the use of engineered nanoparticles in the dietary supplement market. Current law requires supplement manufacturers to disclose limited information about their products, and what information is available is a result of dietary supplement manufacturers touting the use of nanotechnology when marketing their products, according to the report.

"While it is not possible to precisely determine the prevalence of dietary supplements using engineered nanoparticles, it is likely that the public's exposure to these products will grow significantly in the next several years," says Lisa Barclay, also a co-author of the report.

According to an inventory of federal environmental, health and safety research on nanotechnology maintained by PEN, the U.S. government is spending less than $1 million annually to study the direct impact of nanoscale materials on the gastrointestinal tract.

"It is not clear that the supplement industry is conducting the rigorous testing needed either to understand the effects of nanoscale ingredients in its products or to back up the product claims. This means that consumers are potentially exposed to unknown risks that should be balanced with the possible benefits of taking these supplements," says David Rejeski, PEN's director.

Source: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies

Explore further: Pressure probing potential photoelectronic manufacturing compound

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Molecular gate that could keep cancer cells locked up

4 hours ago

In a study published today in Genes & Development, Dr Christian Speck from the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre's DNA Replication group, in collaboration with Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), New York, ...

Taking great ideas from the lab to the fab

4 hours ago

A "valley of death" is well-known to entrepreneurs—the lull between government funding for research and industry support for prototypes and products. To confront this problem, in 2013 the National Science ...

SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas

5 hours ago

A Berlin-based security research and consulting company will reveal how USB devices can do damage that can conduct two-way malice, from computer to USB or from USB to computer, and can survive traditional ...

Recommended for you

Light pulses control graphene's electrical behavior

1 hour ago

Graphene, an ultrathin form of carbon with exceptional electrical, optical, and mechanical properties, has become a focus of research on a variety of potential uses. Now researchers at MIT have found a way to control how ...

A new way to make microstructured surfaces

Jul 30, 2014

A team of researchers has created a new way of manufacturing microstructured surfaces that have novel three-dimensional textures. These surfaces, made by self-assembly of carbon nanotubes, could exhibit a ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

albert
5 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2009
$1 million dollars to investigate nanoparticle effects on human physiology. Hmmmm...man, that's a lot of money. Maybe saving that expense would help balance the budget. Thanks for the article, however. I had no idea that supplements were being infected with man-made nanoparticles. I'll check my providers.
denijane
5 / 5 (2) Jan 15, 2009
$1 million is much for investigation of the effect of nanoparticles in the human physiology?! Nanotechnology is practically used everywhere nowadays- sunscreen, cosmetics, pharmacy. If you don't know it's safe (and we don't know that, because the tests are limited), how do you use it? How do you give it to your children?
And if 1 million is much, try comparing it with 1 trillion for the military industry. Which one is more important for your life?
superhuman
5 / 5 (1) Jan 15, 2009
As much as I am pro nanotechnology I hate it that some greedy morons dump nanoparticles into everyday products without any concern over what effects they might have on people's health. It's dumb, dangerous and very shortsighted.

Nanoparticles can be very dangerous they are readily absorbed through skin, can pass blood brain barrier and some like nanotubes of certain lengths readily penetrate into cells where they can accumulate.

Avoid all nanoparticles until they are properly tested unless you like being a lab rat. Especially chronic exposure should be avoided.
Egnite
5 / 5 (1) Aug 21, 2009
This is excellent that they are actually putting money up to research nanoparticles but like everything else the FDA classifies, the results will mean nothing and 1mil won't be enought to study long term effects. So long as the money's there FDA will allow it, Aspartame (ingredient formaldahyde, aka carcinogen) is a prime example of the FDA's corruptness.