Scientists prove unconventional superconductivity in new iron arsenide compounds

Jan 09, 2009
Scientists prove unconventional superconductivity in new iron arsenide compounds
Materials engineer Duck Young Chung examines a sample of superconducting crystals before characterizing them in a X-ray diffractometer. The crystals signify the next generation of experiments utilizing neutron scattering to determine unconventional superconductivity.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists at U.S. Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory used inelastic neutron scattering to show that superconductivity in a new family of iron arsenide superconductors cannot be explained by conventional theories.

"The normal techniques for revealing unconventional superconductivity don't work with these compounds," physicist Ray Osborn said. "Inelastic neutron scattering is so far the only technique that does."

Conventional superconductivity can be explained by a theory developed by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (BCS) in 1957. In BCS theory, electrons in a superconductor combine to form pairs, called Cooper pairs, which are able to move through the crystal lattice without resistance when an electric voltage is applied. Even when the voltage is removed, the current continues to flow indefinitely, the most remarkable property of superconductivity, and one that explains the keen interest in their technological potential.

Normally, electrons repel each other because of their similar charge, but, in superconductors, they coordinate with vibrations of the crystal lattice to overcome this repulsion. But scientists don't believe the vibrational mechanism in the iron arsenides is strong enough to make them superconducting. This has led theorists to propose that this superconductivity has an unconventional mechanism, perhaps like high-temperature copper-oxide superconductors. Some iron arsenides are antiferromagnetic, rather than superconducting, so magnetism rather than atomic vibrations might provide the electron glue.

In BCS superconductors, the energy gap between the superconducting and normal electronic states is constant, but in unconventional superconductors the gap varies with the direction the electrons are moving. In some directions, the gap may be zero. The puzzle is that the gap does not seem to vary with direction in the iron arsenides. Theorists have argued that, while the size of the gap shows no directional dependence in these new compounds, the sign of the gap is opposite for different electronic states. The standard techniques to measure the gap, such as photoemission, are not sensitive to this change in sign.

But inelastic neutron scattering is sensitive. Osborn, along with Argonne physicist Stephan Rosenkranz, led an international collaboration to perform neutron experiments using samples of the new compounds made in Argonne's Materials Science Division, and discovered a magnetic excitation in the superconducting state that can only exist if the energy gap changes sign from one electron orbital to another.

"Our results suggest that the mechanism that makes electrons pair together could be provided by antiferromagnetic fluctuations rather than lattice vibrations," Rosenkranz said. "It certainly gives direct evidence that the superconductivity is unconventional."

Inelastic neutron scattering continues to be an important tool in identifying unconventional superconductivity, not only in the iron arsenides, but also in new families of superconductors that may be discovered in the future.

A paper ("Unconventional superconductivity in Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 from inelastic neutron scattering") on Osborn's and Rosenkranz's work has been published in volume 456, pages 930-932, of Nature. Funding for this research was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences.

Provided by Argonne National Laboratory

Explore further: Warming up the world of superconductors

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Is iron rain the reason why Earth and the moon are so different?

25 minutes ago

New experiments show that the asteroids that slammed into Earth and the moon more than 4 billion years ago were vaporised into a mist of iron. The findings, published in Nature Geoscience, suggest that the iron mist thrown up from the high ve ...

We must defend science if we want a prosperous future

51 minutes ago

Today's Australians are, by far, the best educated cohort in our history –- on paper, anyway -– but this is not reflected in the quality of our political discourse. We appear to be lacking in courage, ...

Geometry's least-packable shapes

52 minutes ago

If you've ever struggled to pack a bunch of suitcases into the trunk of your car, you've got some idea of a basic problem in materials science: if you throw a bunch of atoms or molecules together, how do ...

Recommended for you

Pennies reveal new insights on the nature of randomness

6 hours ago

The concept of randomness appears across scientific disciplines, from materials science to molecular biology. Now, theoretical chemists at Princeton have challenged traditional interpretations of randomness ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nartoon
1 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2009
That's all very nice, but what temperature does this effect occur at?
Alexa
not rated yet Jan 10, 2009
Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 becomes a superconductor below 38K Is it cool, doesn't it?
Alexa
5 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2009
so magnetism rather than atomic vibrations might provide the electron glue
These electrons are attracted and compressed by presence of holes, i.e. by the atoms with prevailing positive charge. It's similar to situation, when you throw a gold coins into crowd - the people are attracted by money by long-distance interactions, so they will press round it, occasionally fighting each other here. The chaotic motion near holes converts Fermi fluid of electrons into superfluid in analogy to other high pressure superconductivity/supersolidity phenomena:

http://aetherwave...ity.html

The question rather is, why such mechanism in arsenides still differs slightly from one in cuprates, whose superconductivity band exhibits s-wave symmetry, having zero orbital angular momentum. The copper ions contains most of free electrons in s-orbitals, while the iron ions are utilizing spin coupled d-orbitals of lower symmetry degree.

The BSC theory isn't still out of game completelly - it just applies onto pairs of spin entangled electron clusters instead of individual particle pairs, i.e. Cooper pairs are condensing into boson superfluid due the internal pressure of atom lattice.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.