Economist: 'Blending wall' stands in way of ethanol growth

Dec 22, 2008

( -- Ethanol production opened the door to the renewable fuels industry. The industry now must get past an imposing wall of federal regulations and market conditions if it hopes to grow, said a Purdue University agricultural economist.
"The ethanol industry is now faced with what is called a 'blending wall,'" said Wally Tyner, an energy policy specialist. "The ethanol industry will not and cannot grow with the blending wall in place. That means we won't have cellulosic ethanol and the demand for corn for ethanol will be limited unless the blending wall is somehow changed or we find a way around it."

Unless the barrier is removed, ethanol production could level off by 2010, Tyner said.

The blending wall refers to the amount of ethanol gasoline companies are permitted to blend with petroleum-based fuel. Federal standards set the amount at 10 percent of gasoline consumption.

"As a nation we consume about 140 billion gallons of gasoline a year," Tyner said. "So if we blended ethanol with every single drop of gasoline we consume, the maximum amount of ethanol blended would be 14 billion gallons a year. But for a number of reasons we can't blend ethanol with every drop of gasoline. Our effective blending wall is actually about 12 billion gallons, or 9 percent.

"We're not at 12 billion gallons yet, but we'll be there in 2009 or 2010. When we hit that blending wall, the Environmental Protection Agency cannot require gasoline companies to blend more ethanol than they are legally permitted to blend."

Several factors prevent the ethanol industry from breaking through the blending wall, Tyner said.

For starters, there are too few cars and trucks on the nation's roads capable of running on any gasoline with an ethanol blend higher than 10 percent, or what is commonly called E10, Tyner said. A huge gap exists between the E10 fleet and flex-fuel vehicles that run on E85 - an 85/15 ethanol to gasoline blend, he said.

"Only about 7 million of our nation's 300-plus million cars are E85 flex-fuel vehicles," Tyner said. "Also, we have just 1,700 fuel pumps in the entire country that can dispense E85, and most of those are in the Midwest. All of the E85 that's marketed nationwide could be produced by one ethanol plant."

Some in the ethanol industry have proposed that E10 be replaced by an E15 or E20 blend, thereby increasing ethanol use. However, automobile manufacturers do not believe today's E10 vehicles can run on a higher ethanol blend, Tyner said.

"Because the automobile fleet in the United States turns over about every 14 years, it would take some time before E15 or E20 cars would be as common as E10 are now," he said.

Ethanol production growth also is held back by environmental and infrastructure factors, Tyner said.

"In the South during the warm summer months, the vapor pressure of ethanol blends is higher than conventional gasoline," he said. "That causes more evaporative emissions and means the blended fuel does not meet Environmental Protection Agency evaporative emission standards.

"On the infrastructure side, ethanol cannot be shipped by pipeline because it is so corrosive and would absorb any water in the pipeline. It must move by truck, rail or barge instead. That presents logistical problems."

For ethanol production to push past 12 billion gallons per year the blending wall would have to be eliminated and oil prices would need to increase, Tyner said.

The blending wall affects corn prices, as well, by cutting the link between the corn price and the cost of crude oil, Tyner said. In the ethanol era, corn prices have followed oil prices up and down.

"In the economic models we've developed, corn prices never exceed $6 per bushel with the blending wall in place, even with oil prices at $160 per barrel, because you simply can't blend any more ethanol," he said.

"So the blending wall is perhaps the biggest issue the ethanol industry will face in 2009-10. Without a resolution of this issue, ethanol industry growth is about finished."

Provided by Purdue University

Explore further: Can science eliminate extreme poverty?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US does not have infrastructure to consume more ethanol

Jan 04, 2011

The United States doesn't have the infrastructure to meet the federal mandate for renewable fuel use with ethanol but could meet the standard with significant increases in cellulosic and next-generation biofuels, ...

Recommended for you

Can science eliminate extreme poverty?

Apr 16, 2014

Science has often come to the rescue when it comes to the world's big problems, be it the Green Revolution that helped avoid mass starvation or the small pox vaccine that eradicated the disease. There is ...

Japan stem cell body splashes cash on luxury furniture

Apr 14, 2014

A publicly-funded research institute in Japan, already embattled after accusing one of its own stem cell scientists of faking data, has spent tens of thousands of dollars on designer Italian furniture, reportedly to use up ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.4 / 5 (5) Dec 22, 2008
1 / 5 (1) Dec 23, 2008
We could, of course, show some modicum of intelligence and stop the ethanol madness.

We won't because there is too much money to be made from the government subsidies and mandates.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 23, 2008

Whole heartedly agreed.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 24, 2008
How silly. Don't believe the oil company hype. Most vehicles that are E10 capable do not have materials in their fuel systems harmed by ethyl alcohol. Modern car's fuel injections systems are capable of adjusting over a wide range of fuel energy densities. I can speak for Chrysler vehicles (Durango, PT, and Neon) because I've been running self blended ratios of 50% ethanol in these vehicles with no ill effects since 2005. Oil looks cleaner, mileage is, of course, lower, and performance is slightly better. The Durango no longer pings when pulling our 6000# trailer. The blend barrier is a product of oil company lobbying and protectionism. Want more proof? Visit Brazil.
not rated yet Dec 25, 2008
Oil looks cleaner, mileage is, of course, lower, and performance is slightly better.

Mileage being lower and performance being better? Which one is it? A big measure of performance is how well the vehicle can extract the energy from the fuel and then aply it.

Secondly, the price of corn skyrocketed with the biofuel rush. I'd rather eat than drive.

Couple that with the fact that biofuel is almost twice the pollutant that regular gasoline is and you have a 3 time loser on your hands.

More news stories

Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for

A statistical analysis of the gift "fulfillments" at several hundred online wedding gift registries suggests that wedding guests are caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to buying an appropriate gift for the ...

Can new understanding avert tragedy?

As a boy growing up in Syracuse, NY, Sol Hsiang ran an experiment for a school project testing whether plants grow better sprinkled with water vs orange juice. Today, 20 years later, he applies complex statistical ...

Crowd-sourcing Britain's Bronze Age

A new joint project by the British Museum and the UCL Institute of Archaeology is seeking online contributions from members of the public to enhance a major British Bronze Age archive and artefact collection.

Clean air: Fewer sources for self-cleaning

Up to now, HONO, also known as nitrous acid, was considered one of the most important sources of hydroxyl radicals (OH), which are regarded as the detergent of the atmosphere, allowing the air to clean itself. ...

Turning off depression in the brain

Scientists have traced vulnerability to depression-like behaviors in mice to out-of-balance electrical activity inside neurons of the brain's reward circuit and experimentally reversed it – but there's ...