Wobbly planets could reveal Earth-like moons

Dec 11, 2008
An artist's representation of a gas giant exoplanet with a habitable moon Credit: Andy McLatchie

Moons outside our Solar System with the potential to support life have just become much easier to detect, thanks to research by an astronomer at University College London (UCL).

David Kipping, whose work is funded by the UK's Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), has found that such moons can be revealed by looking at wobbles in the velocity of the planets they orbit. His calculations, which appear in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society today (11th December), not only allow us to confirm if a planet has a satellite but to calculate its mass and distance from its host planet – factors that determine the likely habitability of a moon.

Out of the 300+ exoplanets (planets outside our Solar System) currently known, almost 30 are in the habitable zone of their host star but all of these planets are uninhabitable gas giants. The search for moons in orbit around these planets is important in our search for alien life as they too will be in the habitable zone but are more likely to be rocky and Earth-like, with the potential to harbour life.

"Until now astronomers have only looked at the changes in the position of a planet as it orbits its star. This has made it difficult to confirm the presence of a moon as these changes can be caused by other phenomena, such as a smaller planet," said David Kipping. "By adopting this new method and looking at variations in a planet's position and velocity each time it passes in front of its star, we gain far more reliable information and have the ability to detect an Earth-mass moon around a Neptune-mass gas planet."

The appearance of wobbles in a planet's position and velocity are caused by the planet and its moon orbiting a common centre of gravity. While the old method of looking at the wobbles in position allowed astronomers to search for moons, it did not allow them to determine either their mass or their distance from the planet.

Professor Keith Mason, Chief Executive of the Science and Technology Facilities Council, said, "It's very exciting that we can now gather so much information about distant moons as well as distant planets. If some of these gas giants found outside our Solar System have moons, like Jupiter and Saturn, there's a real possibility that some of them could be Earth-like."

Source: Science and Technology Facilities Council

Explore further: The hot blue stars of Messier 47

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The RV Investigator's role in marine science

5 hours ago

We know more about the surface of the moon than we do about our deepest oceans, and only 12% of the ocean floor within Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone has so far been mapped.

Saturn's moons: What a difference a decade makes

Dec 11, 2014

Almost immediately after NASA's twin Voyager spacecraft made their brief visits to Saturn in the early 1980s, scientists were hungry for more. The Voyagers had offered them only a brief glimpse of a family ...

How was the Earth formed?

Dec 10, 2014

Just how did the Earth—our home and the place where life as we know it evolved—come to be created in the first place? In some fiery furnace atop a great mountain? On some divine forge with the hammer ...

Recommended for you

The hot blue stars of Messier 47

Dec 17, 2014

Messier 47 is located approximately 1600 light-years from Earth, in the constellation of Puppis (the poop deck of the mythological ship Argo). It was first noticed some time before 1654 by Italian astronomer ...

Why is space black?

Dec 16, 2014

Imagine you're in space. Just the floating part, not the peeing into a vacuum hose or eating that funky "ice cream" from foil bags part. If you looked at the Sun, it would be bright and your retinas would ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

denijane
not rated yet Dec 15, 2008
Ok, but it's not very clear what the method precisely is and how it differs from the old one.
smiffy
not rated yet Dec 16, 2008
I guess the difference in methods is simply between the variation of the planet's positions in orbit from a regular expected orbit(old method), and the variation about one particular position in orbit (presumably when it passes in front of its star).
Thecis
not rated yet Dec 16, 2008
It could be that they use a similar method as described in an article just a few days ago, that of the light intensity vs planets
Small variations in position when it starts to pass in front of the sun (or on the other end, when it has passed the sun) could hint at a substantial moon around the planet.
but then again, just a guess... It isnt quite clear to me as well
smiffy
5 / 5 (1) Dec 16, 2008
If you're really keen, this is a PDF version of the paper - but it's pretty technical.
http://www3.inter...PDFSTART
Thecis
not rated yet Dec 17, 2008
Quite interesting and explains a lot. Thanks!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.