'No Child' law gets an 'F' from education professor at Illinois

Nov 05, 2008
Sarah J. McCarthey, a professor of language and literacy in the department of curriculum and instruction in the College of Education, says the controversial No Child Left Behind law has forced teachers in low-income school districts to craft a curriculum that marginalizes writing at the expense of teaching to the test. Credit: Photo by L. Brian Stauffer

The controversial No Child Left Behind law has forced teachers in low-income school districts to craft a curriculum that marginalizes writing at the expense of teaching to the test, resulting in educators who feel straitjacketed by a high-stakes test, according to a U. of I. education professor who has studied the issue.

Sarah J. McCarthey, a professor of language and literacy in the department of curriculum and instruction in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has studied the impact of the 7-year-old law on teachers' writing instruction in both high- and low-income schools. She discovered that teachers, especially those in low-income schools, are increasingly jettisoning writing from their language arts block in favor of reading comprehension, one of the subjects along with mathematics used to benchmark a school's progress through an annual battery of federally mandated tests administered by the states. The federal government then uses the test score data to either reward states with federal education funds or to impose punitive measures.

McCarthey, who published her findings in an article titled "The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Teachers' Writing Instruction" in the October issue of Written Communication, said that because the federal government uses only math and reading scores to measure a school's progress, there's little incentive for schools to teach students non-tested subjects such as writing, music, art and science.

"Writing instruction has been neglected at the expense of teaching to the test," McCarthey said, noting that from a pedagogical standpoint, that strategy is somewhat counterintuitive, considering that reading and writing are complementary cognitive activities.

"Being able to write well can make a student a better reader," she said. "But only teaching reading isn't going to make that student a better writer."

The effect on writing instruction has hit underperforming lower-income schools the hardest. In those schools, teachers often had pre-packaged teaching materials foisted upon them by their district, McCarthey said.

"Because they were deemed an underperforming school based on the test results, the district had to legislate the curriculum they were using in both reading and writing. So when they taught reading and writing, they had to use this canned material."

For teachers in struggling schools, the imposition of a district-mandated, one-size-fits-all curriculum turns all the fun and spontaneity of learning into a forced march.

"Both teachers and students became so tired of focusing on and preparing for the test that by test time, they were mentally exhausted," McCarthey said. "For teachers still on probation or in their first three years of teaching, that loss of control over curriculum inevitably leads to a loss of morale and, in some cases, turnover."

McCarthey found that younger teachers in low-income schools felt more pressure to teach to the test than their more experienced counterparts in high-income schools.

"Young teachers in low-income schools are monitored to a greater degree than teachers in high-income schools," she said. "When that happens, there's that much more pressure to perform. Veteran teachers have the latitude to be a little more cavalier, but younger teachers felt much more beholden to the test because the stakes were so high for them."

The problem is compounded because the best veteran teachers invariably end up in higher-income schools, leaving the least prepared and least experienced teachers disproportionally assigned to schools with the greatest needs and challenges.

"Our most-qualified veteran teachers are not ending up where they're needed most," McCarthey said. "They're typically in the higher-income schools because they can afford to pay them more money."

For all of its negatives, McCarthey did note that one positive consequence of No Child Left Behind was that teachers were forced to lavish attention on low-achieving students.

"This is actually one of the benefits of the law, that teachers are thinking a lot more about their low achievers," she said.

But even that benefit has a downside that is symptomatic of the unintended consequences brought about by the law.

"The flip-side is that average and high-achieving students in high-income schools don't receive the attention they deserve," she said. "So we're undermining their educational progress by not challenging them enough."

Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Explore further: Earliest known piece of polyphonic music discovered

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Gift Guide: Five fitness trackers offer wide range

31 minutes ago

There are several fitness trackers to choose from, varying in what they measure and how easy they are to use. Here are five, ranked from budget to sophisticated, to give you a sense of the range available. ...

Microbial 'signature' for sexual crimes

8 hours ago

Bacterial communities living on an individual's pubic hairs could be used as a microbial 'signature' to trace their involvement in sexual assault cases, according to a study published in the open access journal Investigative Ge ...

Recommended for you

Study: Alcatraz inmates could have survived escape

14 hours ago

The three prisoners who escaped from Alcatraz in one of the most famous and elaborate prison breaks in U.S. history could have survived and made it to land, scientists concluded in a recent study.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jeffsaunders
4 / 5 (2) Nov 05, 2008
very sad. Is the contention of the author that: All children should at least be taught to some minimum standard, that the teachers will not teach above this minimum?

very very sad.

And still the dumming down continues unabated.
Quantum_Conundrum
2 / 5 (4) Nov 05, 2008
And still the dumming down continues unabated.


What do you really expect?

When you tell everyone they are nothing more than a pasty skinned gorilla, and the universe is a freak accident, they don't have much motivation to care or to learn anything.

From the youngest age, the liberals teach children an odd, paradoxical dichotomy of entitlement on the one hand, while "preaching" evolution (and consequently meaninglessness) on the other.


The fruits of the "no child left behind act" are 9th graders who can't even do 3rd grade math, and can't read or write, and are ignorant of any concepts of science or philosophy.
notaphysicist
4 / 5 (4) Nov 05, 2008
dumbing not dumming
ofidiofile
5 / 5 (2) Nov 05, 2008
When you tell everyone they are nothing more than a pasty skinned gorilla, and the universe is a freak accident, they don't have much motivation to care or to learn anything.

From the youngest age, the liberals teach children an odd, paradoxical dichotomy of entitlement on the one hand, while "preaching" evolution (and consequently meaninglessness) on the other.

The fruits of the "no child left behind act" are 9th graders who can't even do 3rd grade math, and can't read or write, and are ignorant of any concepts of science or philosophy.


sadly, you are another victim of our failing educational system; "ignorant of any concepts of science" - wow! if you only you could see the irony here.

if you knew a little logic, you'd see that just because you're a "pasty skinned gorilla" does not necessarily imply you're "nothing more" ... just as if, say, you have at least one nickel in your pocket doesn't mean you don't have two, or three, or more! that is your assumption, and only that.

have you heard of the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle? it's when someone takes a single premise and, through much hand-waving, claims to have derived some fantastic conclusion, but without doing any actual work. an example: say, assuming for a moment that(p1>)Evolution is so, (p2>[?]), therefore, (C>)The universe is meaningless. the "undistributed middle" here is (p2>), where the hand-waving takes place. it is an easy way to look like you're making an argument without having to actually provide a premise for it.

is it not possible that we are in fact animals, but not mere animals? that is, animals, but also something more?

what you seem to have done is take a very complicated subject and collapse it into a simple duality; certainly easier to work with than the messy details of a complex world, but far less accurate and, in the end, i think, much less intellectually satisfying.
magpies
4.5 / 5 (2) Nov 06, 2008
I think the problem isnt with schools failing. Its with the fact that people know schools are failing and yet keep sending kids to them. Its like knowing that in a part of town your more likely to die from flooding... Being told its probably gona flood this year... And moving to that part of town. If something is known to not work well and you are told its getting fixed and you wait a year and its still not fixed... You should consider that the people trying to fix it arnt able to and put your efforts into something else.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.