In radiation 'ventriloquism,' electromagnetic waves travel backwards

Sep 23, 2008 By Lisa Zyga feature
This figure shows back power flow lines at 21 GHz. Credit: Cesar Monzon.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Typically, electromagnetic waves travel away from their sources. For instance, a radar system emits radio waves that travel all the way to a target, such as a car or plane, before being reflected back to the source. Police officers and the military rely on the forward movement of the waves to determine the speed or location of an object.

So if electromagnetic radiation started flowing in reverse, back toward its source, it could cause serious confusion. But this is just what Cesar Monzon, a Senior Scientist at Enig Associates, Inc., in Silver Spring, Maryland, has discovered. In a recent study, he theoretically demonstrates that, under special conditions of geometry, location, and frequency, power may flow backwards in the direction of its source. The study is published in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

“I have been working in diverse aspects of electromagnetics for a number of years, and I just happened to stumble on some solutions of Maxwell’s equations that exhibited a very unusual behavior,” Monzon told PhysOrg.com. “It is counterintuitive because we observe that, in some portions of space, the power is actually flowing back in the direction of the sources. On the other hand, based on experience, and with very rare exceptions (that involve wave guidance in exotic circumstances), the radiated power always spreads out as it travels away from the sources. For example, thermal radiation travels in straight lines away from a heat source.”

In Monzon’s theoretical set-up, a number of identical electromagnetic wave sources are aligned in a row. When they radiate power at a certain frequency, an unusual power flow pattern develops at a distance of about half a wavelength away from the sources. At this location, the power turns and flows back toward the source array, accompanied by a vortex formation.

As Monzon explains, the backwards power flow is caused by interference from the multiple sources. The waves superpose in such a way that the phase gradient of the waves points backwards in certain regions. Mathematically speaking, the electrical terms must overcome a geometric term. Monzon likens this condition to that of a mechanical object whose kinetic energy must overcome the potential energy of a barrier in order to overcome the barrier – like a ball with momentum rolling up a hill.

As Monzon notes, the backward power flow is being carried by an ordinary wave, in which the phase velocity, group velocity, and power all point in the same direction. Until now, power flowing toward its source has only been demonstrated for “backward” waves, where some of these characteristics are reversed.

But the fact that ordinary waves are flowing backwards here results in some unusual effects. If an observer were to detect the backward-moving waves, it would seem as if the waves were originating from a “ghost” source in the opposite direction from the true source. Monzon shows that it’s possible to control the placement of the backwards power flow, and harness the effect for various applications, including deception.

“On the case of deception, it appears possible that with current technology we can build a radiator (such as a radar) that can convince an observer, through measurements, that radiation is coming from a given direction, when in reality we are somewhere else, and perhaps even observing them,” he said. “The effect is real, not an illusion. The resulting effect on the observer is, however, akin to the illusion offered by a ventriloquist who manipulates his or her voice so that it appears that the voice is coming from elsewhere.”

Monzon added that the phenomenon could also be applied to other areas, such as optics, acoustics, and water wave problems.

“On the case of satellite antenna feeds, the theory indicates it may be possible to build these behind the main reflector dish, which will offer a clear field of view without blocking or the disadvantages derived from feed offsetting,” he explained. “The same principle applies to both transmit and receive antennas.”

More information: Monzon, Cesar. “Anomalous Power Flow and ‘Ghost’ Sources.” Physical Review Letters 101, 083901 (2008).

Copyright 2008 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.

Explore further: IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New approach to form non-equilibrium structures

1 hour ago

Although most natural and synthetic processes prefer to settle into equilibrium—a state of unchanging balance without potential or energy—it is within the realm of non-equilibrium conditions where new possibilities lie. ...

Nike krypton laser achieves spot in Guinness World Records

2 hours ago

A set of experiments conducted on the Nike krypton fluoride (KrF) laser at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) nearly five years ago has, at long last, earned the coveted Guinness World Records title for achieving "Highest ...

Chemist develops X-ray vision for quality assurance

7 hours ago

It is seldom sufficient to read the declaration of contents if you need to know precisely what substances a product contains. In fact, to do this you need to be a highly skilled chemist or to have genuine ...

The future of ultrashort laser pulses

7 hours ago

Rapid advances in techniques for the creation of ultra-short laser pulses promise to boost our knowledge of electron motions to an unprecedented level.

IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory

Jul 23, 2014

Who will lay claim to having the world's largest particle smasher?. Could China become the collider capital of the world? Questions tease answers, following a news story in Nature on Tuesday. Proposals for ...

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

earls
1.8 / 5 (8) Sep 23, 2008
Forget particles, long live waves.
superhuman
4 / 5 (3) Sep 23, 2008
In reality any metal object in the path of the wave will interfere with this making it very challenging to model where exactly vortexes form and how they look. That makes it rather impractical in any macro-environment.

Still interesting though, but I am not so sure its a new discovery as the setup is very basic.
tpb
4 / 5 (5) Sep 23, 2008
Half-wavelength at radar frequencies is inches, doesn't seem too likely for spoofing someone as to your location when it's only inches away from your actual location.
vivcollins
1 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2008
Half-wavelength at radar frequencies is inches, doesn't seem too likely for spoofing someone as to your location when it's only inches away from your actual location.


So how many half waves are there in RADAR just one?
tpb
4 / 5 (3) Sep 23, 2008
Of course not, but if you look at the picture, the sources are also spaced about a half wavelength from each other. If this worked at other distances away from the source, the pseudo source would appear every half wavelength, getting weaker as it gets farther from the sources.
earls
1 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2008
E_L_Earnhardt
4.3 / 5 (3) Sep 23, 2008
These "ghosts" were confusing in early radar. I'm glad to hear some explanation. We used to think they never got out of the wave guide. Some operators used to call them up to the bridge.
SMMAssociates
4 / 5 (2) Sep 24, 2008
Seems like plain old "Standing Waves" to me....

Power is reflected back to the source by way of improperly matched lines, and I suppose some cavity effects at higher frequencies.

Nothing new there....

Just IMHO....
thales
not rated yet Sep 24, 2008
Mmmmm... did someone say u2013Field?? Ahhh yeah.
Bob_B
1 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2008
The small photo in the main page looks sort of like tits with those pasties some women use to hide the part that feeds young children...be nice now!