Moving Quarks Help Solve Proton Spin Puzzle

Sep 11, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- New theory work at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has shown that more than half of the spin of the proton is the result of the movement of its building blocks: quarks. The result, published in the Sept. 5 issue of Physical Review Letters, agrees with recent experiments and supercomputer calculations.

It was thought that the spin of the proton would come from its quarks, but experiments beginning with the European Muon Collaboration in the 1980s have established that the quarks' spin accounts for only one third of the proton's spin. Researchers thus began investigating other sources of the proton’s spin.

This research concerns one theoretical model, proposed by Jefferson Lab Chief Scientist Tony Thomas and University of South Carolina Professor Fred Myhrer, that suggests that some of the proton’s spin is actually generated as orbital angular momentum by its quarks.

“Rather than the way the quarks are spinning, it's the way they're moving in orbital motion. In fact, more than half of the spin of the proton is orbital motion of the quarks. That's a really fascinating thing,” Thomas said.

In this paper, Thomas explored the model’s predictions further by extracting more detailed information, including how the orbital angular momentum is generated by the different quarks inside the proton, which has two up quarks and one down quark.

He found that the model seemed to contradict experimental results and the results from highly sophisticated supercomputer calculations of quark behavior, called lattice QCD. The model showed that up quarks carried most of the proton’s spin, whereas experiment and lattice QCD point to down quarks.

Thomas said it turns out that the disagreement is only a matter of resolution. The only way to relate such models to the underlying theory of quark interactions is to assume the model’s predictions are made at low resolution. However, experiment and supercomputer calculations are made at high resolution.

“In the past, there's been tremendous success starting with the quark model at some very low scale, and then evolving to a higher scale, where you can compare with experiment,” Thomas explained. “If you make that generally accepted assumption, then the resulting high-resolution values are in surprisingly good agreement with state-of-the-art lattice QCD calculations, as well as with recent experiments conducted at Hermes and Jefferson Lab. There is a remarkable degree of consistency.”

The next step is to compare the model with results from upcoming, more detailed measurements of the orbital angular momentum of the quarks in the proton.

Article: link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v101/e102003

Provided by Jefferson Lab

Explore further: It's particle-hunting season! NYU scientists launch Higgs Hunters Project

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Cornell theorists continue the search for supersymmetry

Sep 16, 2014

(Phys.org) —It was a breakthrough with profound implications for the world as we know it: the Higgs boson, the elementary particle that gives all other particles their mass, discovered at the Large Hadron ...

Recommended for you

Particles, waves and ants

20 hours ago

Animals looking for food or light waves moving through turbid media – astonishing similarities have now been found between completely different phenomena.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dihymo
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 11, 2008
This isn't surprising actually. Once you let go of the droolgawk-inducing notion that something spins twice before it returns, it's obvious that fractional spin is a shared (perhaps relative) feature.

The other explanations involving spherical rotations or revolving a coffee cup in your hand around twice or even some mechanical components all require at least two pivot points or rotational axes.

But all we had to do was stop saying that we don't know why you have to turn by 720 degrees. There's an extreme to which you can deny quantum mechanics, but if you want to dig deeper you have to avoid taking it for granted to the other extreme as well.

deatopmg
1 / 5 (1) Sep 14, 2008
and are quarks simple made up of electrons and positrons, since they can't be fundimental because they don't wave?
Graeme
not rated yet Sep 14, 2008
I thought that proton spin was quantized in Quantum mechanics, and that they had minimal spin, in which case how can there be less spin in the quarks? The spin would be the same or negative. ie 1 1-1=1

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.