Most Black Holes Might Come in Only Small and Large

Aug 20, 2008
Until now, astronomers had suspected that globular clusters like the one pictured here were the most likely place to find medium-sized black holes -- elusive objects that have proved difficult to pin down. Globular clusters are spherical collections of stars that orbit around larger galaxies like our Milky Way. Scientists analyzed a globular cluster called RZ2109 and found it does not possess a medium-sized black hole. RZ2109 is much farther away than the globular cluster pictured here, called Omega Centauri.Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ NOAO/AURA/NSF

(PhysOrg.com) -- Black holes are sometimes huge cosmic beasts, billions of times the mass of our sun, and sometimes petite with just a few times the sun's mass. But do black holes also come in size medium? A new study suggests that, for the most part, the answer is no.

Astronomers have long suspected that the most likely place to find a medium-mass black hole would be at the core of a miniature galaxy-like object called a globular cluster. Yet nobody has been able to find one conclusively.

Now, a team of astronomers has thoroughly examined a globular cluster called RZ2109 and determined that it cannot possess a medium black hole. The findings suggest that the elusive objects do not lurk in globular clusters, and perhaps are very rare.

"Some theories say that small black holes in globular clusters should sink down to the center and form a medium-sized one, but our discovery suggests this isn't true," said Daniel Stern of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. Stern is second author of a study detailing the findings in the Aug. 20 issue of Astrophysical Journal. The lead author is Stephen Zepf of Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Black holes are incredibly dense points of matter, whose gravity prevents even light from escaping. The least massive black holes known are about 10 times the mass of the sun and form when massive stars blow up in supernova explosions. The heftiest black holes are up to billions of times the mass of the sun and lie deep in the bellies of almost all galaxies.

That leaves black holes of intermediate mass, which were thought to be buried at the cores of globular clusters. Globular clusters are dense collections of millions of stars, which reside within galaxies containing hundreds of billions of stars. Theorists argue that a globular cluster should have a scaled down version of a galactic black hole. Such objects would be about 1,000 to 10,000 times the mass of the sun, or medium in size on the universal scale of black holes.

In a previous study, Zepf and his colleagues looked for evidence of a black hole in RZ2109, located 50 million light-years away in a nearby galaxy. Using the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton telescope (which derives its name from X-ray Multi-Mirror design), they discovered the telltale X-ray signature of an active, or "feeding" black hole. But, at that point, they still didn't know its size.

Zepf and Stern then teamed up with others to obtain a chemical fingerprint, called a spectrum, of the globular cluster, using the W.M. Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea in Hawaii. The spectrum revealed that the black hole is petite, with roughly 10 times the mass of our sun.

According to theory, a cluster with a small black hole cannot have a medium one, too. Medium black holes would be quite hefty with a lot of gravity, so if one did exist in a globular cluster, scientists argue that it would quickly drag any small black holes into its grasp.

"If a medium black hole existed in a cluster, it would either swallow little black holes or kick them out of the cluster," said Stern. In other words, the small black hole in RZ2109 rules out the possibility of a medium one.

How did the scientists figure out that the globular cluster's black hole was small in the first place? Using modeling techniques, Zepf and his colleagues concluded that the spectrum taken by Keck reveals high-velocity flows of matter, or "winds," firing out of the black hole. Only a small black hole could spit out these observed high winds.

Zepf explains, "We knew from X-ray data that this black hole was actively swallowing up, or accreting, material. If an intermediate-sized black hole were accreting this material, it wouldn't be too big of a deal for it. But if a small black hole were accreting this material, it would be a lot for it to take and therefore some material would be ejected in the form of high winds. Thus, the high winds were our smoking gun showing that this black hole is small."

Is this the end of the story for medium black holes? Zepf said it is possible such objects are hiding in the outskirts of galaxies like our Milky Way, either in surrounding so-called dwarf galaxies or in the remnants of dwarf galaxies being swallowed by a bigger galaxy. If so, the black holes would be faint and difficult to find.

Provided by NASA

Explore further: 'Blockbuster' science images

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study suggests black hole jets get their power from spin

3 hours ago

(Phys.org) —A team of space scientists working in Italy has found more evidence that suggests the energy needed to emit jets from supermassive black holes comes from the spin of the black hole itself. In ...

Mystery of dwarf galaxy could be ejected black hole

Nov 19, 2014

An international team of researchers analyzing decades of observations from many facilities—including the W. M. Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea, the Pan-STARRS1 telescope on Haleakala and NASA's Swift satellite—has ...

Recommended for you

'Blockbuster' science images

Nov 21, 2014

At this point, the blockbuster movie Interstellar has created such a stir that one would almost have to be inside a black hole not to know about it. And while the science fiction thriller may have taken some ...

Estimating the magnetic field of an exoplanet

Nov 20, 2014

Scientists developed a new method which allows to estimate the magnetic field of a distant exoplanet, i.e., a planet, which is located outside the Solar system and orbits a different star. Moreover, they ...

It's filamentary: How galaxies evolve in the cosmic web

Nov 20, 2014

How do galaxies like our Milky Way form, and just how do they evolve? Are galaxies affected by their surrounding environment? An international team of researchers, led by astronomers at the University of ...

User comments : 15

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TimESimmons
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 20, 2008
An explanation for globular clusters that doesn't require black holes:-

http://www.presto...ndex.htm
earls
not rated yet Aug 20, 2008
Tim, why are the cluster spherical instead of planar like galaxies?
Modernmystic
not rated yet Aug 20, 2008
I've always wondered about that too. Most systems seem to settle down in flat configurations as far as orbits go. Solar systems, galaxies, even planetary systems.
Valentiinro
not rated yet Aug 20, 2008
Because there is not enough interaction between the widely spaced stars in the cluster to flatten out. In a solar system all the dust and such is near enough to interact often enough to settle into a disk and eventually planets.
Or at least that's the last coherent explanation I hear somewhere or other.
Alizee
Aug 20, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
superhuman
not rated yet Aug 21, 2008
So cause one globular cluster has petite black hole none can have medium one? I don't follow that logic.

Besides how can it have only 10 solar masses and at the same time be accreting a lot of material? It would mean that it just started feeding after eons of starvation which seems unlikely.
Even if it is the case other clusters should have holes and different stages, some of them already fed up to medium size.
TimESimmons
2 / 5 (4) Aug 21, 2008
earls, a globular cluster is lile a small scale elliptical galaxy. most stars are within the AGM boundary of the group. in a spiral galaxy the core is within its own AGM Boundary but the arms are outside the core's AGM Boundary.
TimESimmons
1 / 5 (4) Aug 21, 2008
and here's that link again.

http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Alizee
Aug 21, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Alizee
Aug 21, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Alizee
Aug 21, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
rkolter
not rated yet Aug 21, 2008
I also wondered about why a globular cluster could not have small black holes if a medium black hole existed in it. Does this mean that it could not have a star with 10 or more solar masses either? Don't clusters have large stars in them too?
Question
not rated yet Aug 21, 2008
Can anyone explain how star clusters can remain stable for billions of years? What keeps them from collapsing gravitationally?
NeilFarbstein
1 / 5 (1) Aug 22, 2008
rotational and orbital angular moemetum are conserved so the stars in the cluster still have the same aggregate amount of momentum after billions of years.
Question
not rated yet Aug 22, 2008
Thanks, but I still find it confusing because if these star cluster rotate around a common center how could they keep their spherical shape for billions of years? Would they not flatten out like galaxies that rotate? Besides I have never read about star cluster rotating, the Doppler shifting of their light should be able to prove or disprove this.
Alizee
Aug 22, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Question
not rated yet Aug 22, 2008
Whether galaxies get more spherical with age I cannot say but that does bring two question to mind. What happens to the angular momentum of the star obiting the elliptical galaxy? And doesn't any soft rotating object take on a disc shape, so why wouldn't a galaxy?
Alizee
Aug 22, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
TimESimmons
1 / 5 (1) Aug 24, 2008
Alizee. I believe the answer to your question is here:-

http://www.presto...ndex.htm
TimESimmons
1 / 5 (1) Aug 25, 2008
Added text to explain why galaxies are flat:-

http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Glis
not rated yet Aug 25, 2008
So this basically completely destroys Hawkings theory on evaporating black holes or says something very significant about the age of the universe?
Alizee
Sep 12, 2008
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.