Duck-billed dinosaurs outgrew predators to survive

Aug 06, 2008
Hypocrasaurus grew three to five times faster than predators such as tyrannosaurs. Art by: Drew Lee/Ohio University

With long limbs and a soft body, the duck-billed hadrosaur had few defenses against predators such as tyrannosaurs. But new research on the bones of this plant-eating dinosaur suggests that it had at least one advantage: It grew to adulthood much faster than its predators, giving it superiority in size.

In a study published online today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, scientists compared growth rate data from the hadrosaur, Hypacrosaurus, to three predators: the tyrannosaurs Albertosaurus and its gigantic relative Tyrannosaurus rex, as well as the small Velociraptor-like Troodon.

The research suggests that it took 10 to 12 years for Hypacrosaurus to become fully grown. Tyrannosaurs, however, reached adulthood after 20 to 30 years, said Drew Lee, a postdoctoral fellow in Ohio University's College of Osteopathic Medicine who co-authored the paper with Lisa Noelle Cooper, a doctoral student at Kent State University and a researcher with the Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine.

"Our duck-billed dinosaur grew three to five times faster than any potential predators that lived alongside it," Lee said. "By the time the duck-billed dinosaur was fully grown, the tyrannosaurs were only half grown – it was a huge size difference."

Hypacrosaurus also reached sexual maturity early, at only two or three years of age, Cooper said.

"That's another added bonus when facing predators – if you can keep reproducing, you're set," she said. "It's the stuff of evolution."

Cooper conducted the original analysis of the hadrosaur while an undergraduate student at Montana State University. Working with scientists Jack Horner and Mark Taper, Cooper looked at thin sections of the long leg bones of a specimen of Hypacrosaurus and counted and measured the growth rings, which each represent one year of life.

"We were shocked at how fast they grew. If you look at a cross section of the bone of a nestling or even from within the egg, there are huge spaces in which blood supply was going through the bone, which means they were growing like crazy," she said.

Hypacrosaurus was one of three common prey for the meat-eating tyrannosaurs, but was the most vulnerable, Lee said. He described the animal, which lived 67 million to 80 million years ago, as the "Thomson's gazelle of the Late Cretaceous." The other two had horns or had stout, tank-like bodies that would have provided some physical protection from their enemies. But even those creatures show faster growth rates than the predators, Lee noted, with the hadrosaur boasting the quickest growth spurt.

At least one study suggests that living animals employ this survival strategy as well, Lee said. Scientists have found that killifish, a tiny freshwater fish found mainly in the Americas, mature faster when predators lurk. Anecdotal evidence suggests that creatures such as African ungulates grow big to create an advantage over lions, cheetahs and hyenas, he said. And researchers also see signs of this phenomenon in butterflies, toads, salamanders, guppies and some birds, Cooper added.

"Over evolutionary history, this pattern seems to be prevalent," she said.

Though scientists are careful to preserve dinosaur fossils, they've also learned much more about growth rates, life spans, behavior and sexual reproduction of dinosaurs in the past decade by cutting up the bones and taking a closer look at the clues they contain, Lee and Cooper noted. Such research has offered a much more detailed picture of the relationships between different dinosaur species, including predator and prey. Cooper also has used the same bone analysis techniques to confirm the ancestor of whales, a study she co-authored last year in Nature.

Lee, who recently published a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on the sexual maturity rates of dinosaurs, hopes to conduct more research on communities of dinosaurs, such as those of Allosaurus, Stegosaurus and Apatosaurus, to draw further conclusions on the fast growth survival strategy.

"This study is a stepping stone to a larger comparative study on community changes that impacted dinosaur evolution," Lee said.

Source: Ohio University

Explore further: Paleolithic diet may have included snails 10,000 years earlier than previously thought

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mountain Lion! Stand or Run?

Apr 08, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new UC Davis study of 110 years of mountain-lion attacks on people suggests the conventional wisdom of standing your ground may not always be the right course.

Recommended for you

Jurassic Welsh mammals were picky eaters, study finds

4 hours ago

For most people, mere mention of the word Jurassic conjures up images of huge dinosaurs chomping their way through lush vegetation – and each other. However, mammals and their immediate ancestors were also ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

StevenL
2.7 / 5 (7) Aug 06, 2008
Evolution doesn't work the way the headline implies.

Creatures don't evolve to have a result.

Some genetic variation combined with environment factors over many generations causes a measurable difference or the birth of a new species, reproductive success of the larger ones contributed to this process. Duck-billed dinosaurs weren't consciously thinking "hey let's get bigger".
MrFred
1.8 / 5 (5) Aug 06, 2008
"That's another added bonus when facing predators %u2013 if you can keep reproducing, you're set," she said. "It's the stuff of evolution."

Hmmm... so if you want to survive as a species you have to reproduce in order to reproduce (barring a few odd examples) you need a male and a female...
deatopmg
3.9 / 5 (7) Aug 06, 2008
"Our duck-billed dinosaur grew three to five times faster than any potential predators that lived alongside it," Lee said. "By the time the duck-billed dinosaur was fully grown, the tyrannosaurs were only half grown %u2013 it was a huge size difference."

This is silly logic. This wasn't a race. We're looking at equilibrium populations here, so the time to size maturity for the prey and predator are not directly related to each other.

What was necessary for the prey was to grow at a sufficient rate to reach sexual maturity quickly enough to allow replacement of those who died. That's all.
jeffsaunders
2 / 5 (4) Aug 07, 2008
The heading does imply result was achieved for specific purpose when this is indeed not the case, as has been succinctly pointed out above.

Evolution does not occur to achieve specific goals. What is more likely is that high levels of predation favoured survival of prey with faster growth, bigger size and higher birthrates.
DraganGlas
3.3 / 5 (3) Aug 11, 2008
Although I agree with the points raised, I'm certain the quoted comments by those involved in the study - if not the article's heading - were not meant to imply what has been inferred.

The result of the "arms race" between predator and prey, in this and other examples mentioned, is that the survivors of the prey species were those which, amongst other traits to ensure survival, tended to grow faster than their predator species.

For all intents and purposes, they "outgrew their predators to survive".

Not as a goal in itself, but as a result of the "arms race" - as has been indicated in the above comments.

@deatopmg
With all due respect, I'm not certain that the accelerated sexual maturity was the only advantage afforded by the prey species' rate of growth exceeding that of the predator species ("time to size maturity").

Attacking a large(r) animal puts the predator at greater risk.

There would, thus, be a smaller "window" for the predator to attack its prey before the latter reaches a size which would cause the former pause for thought.

The predator would tend to favour attacking younger (smaller) members of the prey species rather than risk injury (or even death) attacking older (larger) animals.

Once the individual member of the prey species reached a certain size, it would be relatively "safe" from predation.

One could think of it in terms of a bully and his victim. Generally, the bully tends to pick on those smaller than him/herself. What if the victim experiences a spurt of growth? This year, he's smaller - next year, he's as big - the year after that, he's bigger than the bully. The bully would be less likely to attack the "victim" from next year (same size) onward.

Thus there are two advantages inherent in this reported evolved survival-strategy - accelerated sexual maturity (faster rate of reproduction) and physical size (less likely to be attacked, thus better ensuring a continued faster rate of reproduction).