NASA Plans to Visit the Sun

Jun 10, 2008
NASA Plans to Visit the Sun
A simulated view of the Sun illustrating the trajectory of Solar Probe+ during its multiple near-Sun passes.

For more than 400 years, astronomers have studied the sun from afar. Now NASA has decided to go there. "We are going to visit a living, breathing star for the first time," says program scientist Lika Guhathakurta of NASA Headquarters. "This is an unexplored region of the solar system and the possibilities for discovery are off the charts."

The name of the mission is Solar Probe+ (pronounced "Solar Probe plus"). It's a heat-resistant spacecraft designed to plunge deep into the sun's atmosphere where it can sample solar wind and magnetism first hand. Launch could happen as early as 2015. By the time the mission ends 7 years later, planners believe Solar Probe+ will solve two great mysteries of astrophysics and make many new discoveries along the way.

The probe is still in its early design phase, called "pre-phase A" at NASA headquarters, says Guhathakurta. "We have a lot of work to do, but it's very exciting."

Johns Hopkins' Applied Physics Lab (APL) will design and build the spacecraft for NASA. APL already has experience sending probes toward the sun. APL's MESSENGER spacecraft completed its first flyby of the planet Mercury in January 2008 and many of the same heat-resistant technologies will fortify Solar Probe+. (Note: The mission is called Solar Probe plus because it builds on an earlier 2005 APL design called Solar Probe.)

At closest approach, Solar Probe+ will be 7 million km or 9 solar radii from the sun. There, the spacecraft's carbon-composite heat shield must withstand temperatures greater than 1400o C and survive blasts of radiation at levels not experienced by any previous spacecraft. Naturally, the probe is solar powered; it will get its electricity from liquid-cooled solar panels that can retract behind the heat-shield when sunlight becomes too intense. From these near distances, the Sun will appear 23 times wider than it does in the skies of Earth.

The two mysteries prompting this mission are the high temperature of the sun's corona and the puzzling acceleration of the solar wind:

Mystery #1—the corona: If you stuck a thermometer in the surface of the sun, it would read about 6000o C. Intuition says the temperature should drop as you back away; instead, it rises. The sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, registers more than a million degrees Celsius, hundreds of times hotter than the star below. This high temperature remains a mystery more than 60 years after it was first measured.

Mystery #2—the solar wind: The sun spews a hot, million mph wind of charged particles throughout the solar system. Planets, comets, asteroids—they all feel it. Curiously, there is no organized wind close to the sun's surface, yet out among the planets there blows a veritable gale. Somewhere in between, some unknown agent gives the solar wind its great velocity. The question is, what?

"To solve these mysteries, Solar Probe+ will actually enter the corona," says Guhathakurta. "That's where the action is."

The payload consists mainly of instruments designed to sense the environment right around the spacecraft—e.g., a magnetometer, a plasma wave sensor, a dust detector, electron and ion analyzers and so on. "In-situ measurements will tell us what we need to know to unravel the physics of coronal heating and solar wind acceleration," she says.

Solar Probe+'s lone remote sensing instrument is the Hemispheric Imager. The "HI" for short is a telescope that will make 3D images of the sun's corona similar to medical CAT scans. The technique, called coronal tomography, is a fundamentally new approach to solar imaging and is only possible because the photography is performed from a moving platform close to the sun, flying through coronal clouds and streamers and imaging them as it flies by and through them.

With a likely launch in May 2015, Solar Probe+ will begin its prime mission near the end of Solar Cycle 24 and finish near the predicted maximum of Solar Cycle 25 in 2022. This would allow the spacecraft to sample the corona and solar wind at many different phases of the solar cycle. It also guarantees that Solar Probe+ will experience a good number of solar storms near the end of its mission. While perilous, this is according to plan: Researchers suspect that many of the most dangerous particles produced by solar storms are energized in the corona—just where Solar Probe+ will be. Solar Probe+ may be able to observe the process in action and show researchers how to forecast Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) events that threaten the health and safety of astronauts.

Solar Probe+'s repeated plunges into the corona will be accomplished by means of Venus flybys. The spacecraft will swing by Venus seven times in six years to bend the probe’s trajectory deeper and deeper into the sun’s atmosphere. Bonus: Although Venus is not a primary target of the mission, astronomers may learn new things about the planet when the heavily-instrumented probe swings by.

"Solar Probe+ is an extraordinary mission of exploration, discovery and deep understanding," says Guhathakurta. "We can't wait to get started."

Source: Science@NASA, by Dr. Tony Phillips

Explore further: SpaceX ship leaves ISS for Earth loaded with lab results

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Cassini caught in Hyperion's particle beam

Oct 17, 2014

Static electricity is known to play an important role on Earth's airless, dusty moon, but evidence of static charge building up on other objects in the solar system has been elusive until now. A new analysis ...

How citizen scientists took control of a spaceship

Oct 03, 2014

For decades, space exploration remained a domain within reach of only government agencies, who could command huge pools of expertise and public funds. Now the means by which our space endeavours are funded ...

The wake-up call that sent hearts racing

Oct 01, 2014

"But as the minutes ticked by, the relaxed attitude of many of us began to dissolve into apprehension. Our levels of adrenaline and worry began to rise."

Scientific instruments of Rosetta's Philae lander

Sep 23, 2014

When traveling to far off lands, one packs carefully. What you carry must be comprehensive but not so much that it is a burden. And once you arrive, you must be prepared to do something extraordinary to make ...

Recommended for you

Hinode satellite captures X-ray footage of solar eclipse

Oct 24, 2014

The moon passed between the Earth and the sun on Thursday, Oct. 23. While avid stargazers in North America looked up to watch the spectacle, the best vantage point was several hundred miles above the North ...

User comments : 15

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Inflaton
5 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
And here's the same article released just over a month ago on another website.

http://www.scienc...4224.htm
earls
3.3 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
"Launch could happen as early as 2015."

:(
superhuman
3.7 / 5 (9) Jun 10, 2008
The answer to both questions has to be "energy comes from Sun's magnetic fields rearranging violently", after all thats what drives protuberances afair. Corona probably stays hotter due to lower density and therefore heat conductance.

BTW I love our Sun! It is The Sole Creator of our World and human race, it keeps on feeding us the precious Energy and without it we won't last long! The Sun God is the only god whose cult makes scientific sense. Praise the Sun!
zevkirsh
3 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
i predict this solar mission gets scrapped when they realize how utterly absurd/difficult it is to design something any moer complex than a giant rock to withstand this heat. they'd be better of just sending some sattelites to the lagrangian points and having them get a 3d-full circle real time view of the sun, and possibly a sattelite in a polar orbit of the sun too, sending soemthing so close is just dumb becuase it will just burn up.
z
Mercury_01
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
I predict that this project will recieve huge public support and phat grants from every direction when the sun fries all our sattelites out of the sky around 2012.

I also agree with the "whipping" magnetic field theory.
thales
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
"If you stuck a thermometer in the surface of the sun, it would read about 6000o C. Intuition says the temperature should drop as you back away; instead, it rises. The sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, registers more than a million degrees Celsius."

So, why not send a probe in to orbit just above the surface? Shielding wouldn't burn up as quickly. Imagine getting a close-up photo or video of a solar flare. Awesome.
Mercury_01
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
I hadnt thought of that, Now I wonder if theyre going to put a badasss camera onboard for some serious solar closeups.
zevkirsh
3.8 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
um yea, get even closer to the sun, bad idea: here's why.. the density of heat is much great as you get closer to the sun, cornoal temperature notwithstanding:
the temperature of the exosphere is actually quite high at a certain point high up enough, becuae the particles are really fast becuaset they don't slow down by bumping into each other.....but if you go up there, you'll radiate heat faster than these particles provide you heat through convection, same thing with being closer to the sun, it's effectively much more survivable in the corona than the surface of the sun.
it's not how hot something is, it's how much heat that thing has and how much of that heat can be transferred to you htat you must worry about.
thales
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
I think what you're trying to say is the density of particles is greater nearer the sun, so heat transfers more quickly. That's a good point. I suggest, however, that there's a sweet spot ABOVE the surface where temperature is relatively low and plasma density doesn't cancel that out.
Glis
4.7 / 5 (3) Jun 10, 2008
They can't get a shovel to work on Mars and now they're getting funding together to send measurements back from the sun? These guys have some brass ones.
gopher65
not rated yet Jun 10, 2008
Exactly zevkirsh.

Temperature is the measurement of the average speed of the particles (and molecules) a given volume of space. It says nothing about the density of those particles. As an example of this (kinda), think about steam and water. If both are at 100 C, which feels hotter? The water does, because it can transfer far more heat to you per second than steam can, even though they both have the same temp.

It's the same way with the corona and the photosphere. Technically, yes, the photosphere is colder, but you'll be encountering a far greater number of particles there than you would in the corona. So the question becomes, which is better, being hit by a few super high energy particles, or being hit by reams of slightly less energetic particles?

Also remember that you're having to deal with direct EM radiation from the sun as well, not just energetic particles. EM radiation density should decrease by the square power as you travel further away from the photosphere. Still thales, I kinda wonder that bit about a sweet spot too.
Eco_R1
1 / 5 (1) Jun 11, 2008
"the solar wind: The sun spews a hot, million mph wind of charged particles throughout the solar system."

the speed of light is but 186 000 mph, so??? is there something i must know....
Eco_R1
5 / 5 (4) Jun 11, 2008
its per second i see, sorry phys org!
DGBEACH
5 / 5 (2) Jun 12, 2008
They can't get a shovel to work on Mars and now they're getting funding together to send measurements back from the sun?


I think that Icarus would be a more suiting name for the probe -:)
nano999
5 / 5 (2) Jun 12, 2008
Why don't they just go at night?

kidding.