Entrepreneurial Strategies Have Different Implications for Different Actions

Apr 03, 2008

A new study published in the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal illustrates the important implications that both Discovery Theory and Creation Theory have on the effectiveness of a variety of entrepreneurial actions within different contexts.

Discovery Theory is categorized by the idea that entrepreneurial opportunities exist, independent of the perceptions of entrepreneurs, just waiting to be discovered. In contrast, Creation Theory holds that these opportunities are created by the actions of entrepreneurs.

Led by Sharon A. Alvarez and Jay B. Barney of the Fisher College of Business at Ohio State University, researchers explored these theories of entrepreneurship and their implications for the actions of entrepreneurs.

Both Discovery and Creation theory assume the goal of entrepreneurs is to form and exploit opportunities. However, the theories often generate different predictions about when specific actions will be more or less effective in enabling entrepreneurs to form these opportunities.

Only when the theories are linked to specific actions can they have repercussions. The study reviews the implications of discovery and creation assumptions for seven actions, including leadership, decision making, human resource practices, strategy, finance, marketing, and sustaining competitive advantages.

When entrepreneurs operate in a discovery context, a variety of specific actions are likely to be most effective. When they operate in a creation context, a different set of entrepreneurial actions are likely to be most effective.

For example, when exploring the entrepreneurial action of leadership, when operating in a discovery context it would be best for the entrepreneur to lead based on expertise and experience. However, if operating within a creation context, it would be best to lead based on charisma.

“Future research in entrepreneurship will need to carefully examine the context under which entrepreneurs are operating,” the authors conclude. “Understanding the implications of these two theories for the effectiveness of a wide variety of entrepreneurial actions is important.”

Source: Blackwell Publishing

Explore further: Ig Nobel winner: Using pork to stop nosebleeds

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Top Alibaba executives resign after fraud probe

Feb 21, 2011

(AP) -- Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba says two of its top executives are resigning to take responsibility after a probe discovered more than 2,000 suppliers had defrauded customers, sometimes with the alleged collusion ...

Nano world off the radar for most

Jan 22, 2007

Sunscreens contain nano particles, carbon and titania nanotubes show promise and nano structures are the rage in engineering schools. While the proliferation of nano research may signal a mini revolution, outside the realms ...

Recommended for you

Ig Nobel winner: Using pork to stop nosebleeds

Sep 19, 2014

There's some truth to the effectiveness of folk remedies and old wives' tales when it comes to serious medical issues, according to findings by a team from Detroit Medical Center.

History books spark latest Texas classroom battle

Sep 16, 2014

As Texas mulls new history textbooks for its 5-plus million public school students, some academics are decrying lessons they say exaggerate the influence of Christian values on America's Founding Fathers.

Flatow, 'Science Friday' settle claims over grant

Sep 16, 2014

Federal prosecutors say radio host Ira Flatow and his "Science Friday" show that airs on many National Public Radio stations have settled civil claims that they misused money from a nearly $1 million federal ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Argiod
1 / 5 (2) Apr 04, 2008
"...if operating within a creation context, it would be best to lead based on charisma..."

Aren't these folks called Con Artists, Religious Leaders, and Politicians?