Entrepreneurial Strategies Have Different Implications for Different Actions

Apr 03, 2008

A new study published in the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal illustrates the important implications that both Discovery Theory and Creation Theory have on the effectiveness of a variety of entrepreneurial actions within different contexts.

Discovery Theory is categorized by the idea that entrepreneurial opportunities exist, independent of the perceptions of entrepreneurs, just waiting to be discovered. In contrast, Creation Theory holds that these opportunities are created by the actions of entrepreneurs.

Led by Sharon A. Alvarez and Jay B. Barney of the Fisher College of Business at Ohio State University, researchers explored these theories of entrepreneurship and their implications for the actions of entrepreneurs.

Both Discovery and Creation theory assume the goal of entrepreneurs is to form and exploit opportunities. However, the theories often generate different predictions about when specific actions will be more or less effective in enabling entrepreneurs to form these opportunities.

Only when the theories are linked to specific actions can they have repercussions. The study reviews the implications of discovery and creation assumptions for seven actions, including leadership, decision making, human resource practices, strategy, finance, marketing, and sustaining competitive advantages.

When entrepreneurs operate in a discovery context, a variety of specific actions are likely to be most effective. When they operate in a creation context, a different set of entrepreneurial actions are likely to be most effective.

For example, when exploring the entrepreneurial action of leadership, when operating in a discovery context it would be best for the entrepreneur to lead based on expertise and experience. However, if operating within a creation context, it would be best to lead based on charisma.

“Future research in entrepreneurship will need to carefully examine the context under which entrepreneurs are operating,” the authors conclude. “Understanding the implications of these two theories for the effectiveness of a wide variety of entrepreneurial actions is important.”

Source: Blackwell Publishing

Explore further: Corporate interest is a problem for research into open-access publishing

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Top Alibaba executives resign after fraud probe

Feb 21, 2011

(AP) -- Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba says two of its top executives are resigning to take responsibility after a probe discovered more than 2,000 suppliers had defrauded customers, sometimes with the alleged collusion ...

Nano world off the radar for most

Jan 22, 2007

Sunscreens contain nano particles, carbon and titania nanotubes show promise and nano structures are the rage in engineering schools. While the proliferation of nano research may signal a mini revolution, outside the realms ...

Recommended for you

UC Santa Barbara receives $65M from Munger

Oct 30, 2014

A physics institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has received a $65 million donation—the largest single gift in the university's history.

Prophet's ancient seal provides insights from antiquity

Oct 30, 2014

When a personal artifact of a religious leader is discovered nearly 1,700 years after its use, the object provides invaluable historical insights. Zsuzsanna Gulacsi, professor of Comparative Cultural Studies, ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Argiod
1 / 5 (2) Apr 04, 2008
"...if operating within a creation context, it would be best to lead based on charisma..."

Aren't these folks called Con Artists, Religious Leaders, and Politicians?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.