Despite awareness of global warming Americans concerned more about local environment

Mar 26, 2008

Last week, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared climate change a top international threat, and Al Gore urged politicians to get involved to fight global warming. Results from a recent survey conducted by a University of Missouri professor reveal that the U.S. public, while aware of the deteriorating global environment, is concerned predominantly with local and national environmental issues.

“The survey’s core result is that people care about their communities and express the desire to see government action taken toward local and national issues,” said David Konisky, a policy research scholar with the Institute of Public Policy. “People are hesitant to support efforts concerning global issues even though they believe that environmental quality is poorer at the global level than at the local and national level. This is surprising given the media attention that global warming has recently received and reflects the division of opinion about the severity of climate change.”

Konisky, an assistant professor in the Truman School of Public Affairs at MU, recently surveyed 1,000 adults concerning their attitudes about the environment. The survey polled respondents about their levels of concern for the environment and preferences for government action to address a wide set of environmental issues.

A strong majority of the public expressed general concern about the environment. According to the survey, the top three issues that the public wants the government to address are protecting community drinking water, reducing pollution of U.S. rivers and lakes, and improving urban air pollution issues like smog. In the survey, global warming ranks eighth in importance.

“Americans are clearly most concerned about pollution issues that might affect their personal health, or the health of their families,” Konisky said.

Additionally, Konisky and his colleagues found that the best predictor of individuals’ environmental preferences is their political attributes. They examined the relationship between party identification and political ideology and support for action to address environmental problems.

“The survey reinforced the stark differences in people’s environmental attitudes, depending on their political leanings,” Konisky said. “Democrats and political liberals clearly express more desire for governmental action to address environmental problems. Republicans and ideological conservatives are much less enthusiastic about further government intervention.”

Source: University of Missouri-Columbia

Explore further: When the isthmus is an island: Madison's hottest, and coldest, spots

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Protons hog the momentum in neutron-rich nuclei

30 minutes ago

Like dancers swirling on the dance floor with bystanders looking on, protons and neutrons that have briefly paired up in the nucleus have higher-average momentum, leaving less for non-paired nucleons. Using ...

Cosmic jets of young stars formed by magnetic fields

31 minutes ago

Astrophysical jets are counted among our Universe's most spectacular phenomena: From the centers of black holes, quasars, or protostars, these rays of matter sometimes protrude several light years into space. ...

Mysterious Midcontinent Rift is a geological hybrid

56 minutes ago

An international team of geologists has a new explanation for how the Midwest's biggest geological feature—an ancient and giant 2,000-mile-long underground crack that starts in Lake Superior and runs south ...

Recommended for you

Stopping the leaks

13 hours ago

When a big old cast-iron water main blows, it certainly makes for a spectacular media event.

Alpine lifelines on the brink

14 hours ago

Only one in ten Alpine rivers are healthy enough to maintain water supply and to cope with climate impacts according to a report by WWF. The publication is the first-ever comprehensive study on the condition ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

thinking
5 / 5 (4) Mar 26, 2008
Whats wrong about being concerned about the local environment? Take care of your own yard, take care of what you can take care of.

What does this professor what the US to do? Invade China, India, Mexico, to force them to clean up their countries?
Argiod
2.6 / 5 (5) Mar 27, 2008
That's a no-brainer. Of course we're more concerned about what's happening in our own back yard. That's what affects us more immediately. What care have I for what's happening to people overseas, if there's a disaster waiting to wreck my life right here at home? It is natural, and fitting, that we clean up our own space, and let others do the same in their's.
As to thinking's comment; no, the US isn't going to invade other countries to make them clean up their spaces... we're too busy making messes of other countries, in the name of 'Peace'.
greenadine
3 / 5 (3) Mar 27, 2008
If one were to analyze the origins of exclusivity in America, one strong factor would emerge. Immigrants have the propensity to protect themselves from outside influences, and in doing so, they soon become xenophobic in essence.

In a nation made of vast numbers of cultures, the country becomes insular to external concerns. They are detached from their ancestry, their natural roots, this mood pervades all policy making. Only a wider eduction would teach the basic principles of inter-activity.

The US is an island at the mercy of prevailing winds and is going to be blown out of economic and ecologic waters if it does not clean up it's own runaway consumerism. we need to see the connectivity here. or we'll be affected by the consequences. Let's take personal responsibility and clean this precious backyard of ours for everyone's sake.
aufever
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 27, 2008
Global Warming, the new Religion with the Reverend Al Gore at it's head to make Millions off Carbon Trading and many other scams.