New workout 'paradigm' promises to preserve value in financially troubled companies

Dec 19, 2007

With the recent wave of highly leveraged private equity deals and the current problems in credit markets, market observers are now predicting a sharp increase in corporate defaults, with possibly serious spillover effects. But thanks to changes in workout and bankruptcy practices in the U.S. and abroad during the last two decades, the prospects for preserving the values of financially distressed companies are greatly improved.

In the "Morgan Stanley Roundtable on Managing Financial Trouble" that appears in the Fall 2007 issue of the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, a distinguished group of bankruptcy academics and practitioners discuss the promise of these developments, along with a number of potential obstacles.

The discussion begins with University of Chicago legal scholar Douglas Baird and bankruptcy lawyer Donald Bernstein describing a "new corporate reorganization paradigm"--one in which vigorous trading of distressed corporate debt by active investors such as hedge funds and private equity firms ends up transferring corporate assets quickly to their most efficient users.

However, this new, market-driven reorganization process does face some relatively new challenges. In many cases, accomplishing this task will require investors to find ways to manage relatively new “inter-creditor” conflicts stemming from the use of junior secured (“second-lien”) debt and the dispersion of claims in collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and colleralized loan obligations (CLOs).

The good news--and the dominant theme of the discussion--is the ingenuity of today’s distressed investors in finding ways to keep viable, but financially distressed companies out of bankruptcy when possible—while making the most of the advantages of the new streamlined Chapter 11 when not.

“It’s the great paradox of capitalism that all this self-interest, this so-called ‘vulture’ investing, is likely to end up benefitting all of us,” Douglas Baird tells his fellow panelist in closing. “If we do go into recession and companies begin to struggle with their debt loads, then it may be the activity of people like you around this that is the best hope for ensuring that the businesses that should survive, do survive.”

Source: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Explore further: When it comes to how pizza looks, cheese matters

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Are corporate bailouts effective?

Nov 17, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Do corporate bailouts actually work? According to a recent study, some bailouts work better than others, depending on the conditions surrounding them.

Recommended for you

When it comes to how pizza looks, cheese matters

11 hours ago

Most consumers have an idea what they want their pizza slice to look like. Golden cheese with that dark toasted-cheese color scattered in distinct blistery patches across the surface with a bit of oil glistening in the valleys. ...

Freedom and responsibility of science

17 hours ago

Yesterday, the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Leopoldina National Academy of Sciences presented their recommendations for "The Freedom and Responsibility of Science" in Berlin. Both research organizations appeal ...

What I learned from debating science with trolls

Aug 20, 2014

I often like to discuss science online and I'm also rather partial to topics that promote lively discussion, such as climate change, crime statistics and (perhaps surprisingly) the big bang. This inevitably ...

Activists urge EU to scrap science advisor job

Aug 19, 2014

Nine major charities urged the European Commission on Tuesday to scrap a science advisor position it says puts too much power over sensitive policy into the hands of one person.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Gully_Foyle
not rated yet Dec 20, 2007
It is bad enough when PhysOrg is pumping global polluting mass consumerism and shilling for any company which claims a technological advance over whale oil, but now they are promoting " 'vulture ' investing,...benefitting all of us" from the same vultures who brought you the "sub-prime" (a misnomer since all those loans were way *over* prime) fiasco. The lie of the rich has always been that if they are allowed to rob everybody else, some (magic) way "everybody" comes out ahead. OK, there are lots of different political and economic views, but how is any of this shark (apologies to superorder Selachimorpha) rationalization related to physics or science in general?