Rise in atmospheric CO2 accelerates as economy grows, natural carbon sinks weaken

Oct 22, 2007

Human activities are releasing carbon dioxide faster than ever, while the natural processes that normally slow its build up in the atmosphere appear to be weakening. These conclusions are drawn in a new study in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, October 22-26. The report states that “together, these effects characterize a carbon cycle that is generating stronger-than-expected climate forcing sooner than expected.”

Between 2000 to 2006, human activities such as burning fossil fuels, manufacturing cement, and tropical deforestation contributed an average of 4.1 billion metric tons of carbon to the atmosphere each year, yielding an annual growth rate for atmospheric carbon dioxide of 1.93 parts per million (ppm).

“This is the highest since the beginning of continuous monitoring in 1959,” states the report. The growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide is significantly larger than those for the 1980s and 1990s, which were 1.58 and 1.49 ppm per year, respectively. The present atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is 381 ppm, the largest concentration in the last 650,000 years, and probably in the last 20 million years.

While the worldwide acceleration in carbon dioxide emissions had been previously noted, the current analysis provides insights into its causes. “The new twist here is the demonstration that weakening land and ocean sinks are contributing to the accelerating growth of atmospheric CO2,” says co-author Chris Field, director of the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology.

Changes in wind patterns over the Southern Ocean resulting from human-induced global warming have brought carbon-rich water toward the surface, reducing the ocean’s ability to absorb excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. On land, where plant growth is the major mechanism for drawing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, large droughts have reduced the uptake of carbon.

Emissions from the burning of fossil fuels constituted the largest source of anthropogenic carbon, releasing an average of 7.6 billion metric tons each year between 2000 and 2006, a significant jump from 6.5 billion tons in the 1990s. Emissions generated by land-use changes such as deforestation have remained constant, but shifted in geographic focus.

Source: Carnegie Institution

Explore further: Chinese, Indian airlines face EU pollution fines

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Geologists study mystery of 'eternal flames'

May 09, 2013

"Eternal flames" fueled by hydrocarbon gas could shine a light on the presence of natural gas in underground rock layers and conditions that let it seep to the surface, according to research by geologists ...

Ice-free Arctic may be in our future, says research

May 09, 2013

Analyses of the longest continental sediment core ever collected in the Arctic, recently completed by an international team led by Julie Brigham-Grette of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, provide ...

Electrolysis method described for making 'green' iron

May 08, 2013

Anyone who has seen pictures of the giant, red-hot cauldrons in which steel is made—fed by vast amounts of carbon, and belching flame and smoke—would not be surprised to learn that steelmaking is one of the world's leading ...

Recommended for you

Bold action, big money needed to curb Asia floods

11 minutes ago

Asia's flood-prone megacities should fund major drainage, water recycling and waste reduction projects to stem deluges and secure clean supply for their booming populations, experts said Sunday.

Heat-related deaths in Manhattan projected to rise

1 hour ago

Residents of Manhattan will not just sweat harder from rising temperatures in the future, says a new study; many may die. Researchers say deaths linked to warming climate may rise some 20 percent by the 2020s, ...

Dire outlook despite global warming 'pause': study

1 hour ago

A global warming "pause" over the past decade may invalidate the harshest climate change predictions for the next 50 to 100 years, a study said Sunday—though levels remain in the danger zone.

Chinese, Indian airlines face EU pollution fines

May 18, 2013

Eight Chinese and two Indian airlines face fines of up to several million euros for not paying for their greenhouse gas emissions during flights within the bloc, the European Commission said on Friday.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NotParker
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 23, 2007
Facts:

1) The Southern Hempisphere is cooling and has been for 5 years
2) More sunshine is reaching the earth
3) CO2 is released by oceans when they warm up
Elenneth
4 / 5 (2) Oct 23, 2007
The capacity for a liquid to hold a dissolved gas (i.e. dissolved carbon dioxide in ocean water) decreases as the temperature of the liquid increases. For example, an opened can of soda at room temperature will loose its carbonation much faster than an opened can of soda in the refrigerator.

Therefore, the warmer the temperature of the ocean, the less of an ability it has to hold carbon dioxide and the greater its rate of dissolved carbon dioxide release. In this case, carbon-rich water, as it moves from a lower depth (read: cooler temperature) to a shallower depth (read: warmer temperature), it would make sense that it would release stored carbon dioxide.

I am not certain that I have heard of that statement that more sunshine is reaching the earth. From where do you draw this?
mikiwud
3.5 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2007
If there are less clouds more heat reaches the Earth thus warming the oceans.The heating could be caused by thermal action from the Earth's core.As the greenhouse effect signature predicted by the computer models is not visible in the recorded data,this is more likley than AGW.
Elenneth
5 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2007
Cloud coverage also serves as insulation to keep the heat in. That is why deserts, which are often devoid of cloud cover, can reach extreme daytime temperatures, while at night experience a drastic plummet in the temperature because of a lack of cloud cover to insulate against lost heat.
mikiwud
4 / 5 (2) Oct 26, 2007
Elenneth,
That is the local effect felt anywere it happens.
Globaly the effect is more cloud,less heat reaches the earth also more is reflected back into space and vice versa.

More news stories

Heat-related deaths in Manhattan projected to rise

Residents of Manhattan will not just sweat harder from rising temperatures in the future, says a new study; many may die. Researchers say deaths linked to warming climate may rise some 20 percent by the 2020s, ...

Mice, gerbils perish in Russia space flight

A number of mice and eight gerbils sent into space in a Russian capsule destined to find out how well organisms can withstand extended flights perished during their journey, scientists said Sunday as the ...