Geologists find well water chemicals changed prior to two different earthquakes

September 22, 2014 by Bob Yirka report
The Húsavík-Flatey Fault cuts across young lava near Húsavík town. Magnitude 5 earthquakes occurred along this fault in 2012 and 2013. Chemical changes were detected in groundwater before both of these earthquakes. Credit: Alasdair Skelton

(Phys.org) —A team of researchers with members from Iceland, Sweden and Saudi Arabia has found evidence of chemical changes to underground well water prior to two different earthquakes that occurred in 2012 and 2013 in Iceland. In their paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience, the researchers acknowledge that their findings do not suggest that they have found a reliable earthquake precursor, but they do believe they may be on to something. S.E. Ingebritsen with the U.S. Geological Survey and M. Manga with the University of California, describe the research in a News & Views piece in the same journal issue and suggest that more such research be done.

People have wished there were a way to predict earthquakes for thousands of years—as population centers have grown in size, the urgency has only grown as earthquakes cause massive damage and kill with astonishing regularity. Unfortunately, earthquakes remain the lone natural disaster where no warning can be given for those in a soon-to-be impacted area. That could change, however, if the findings by the team in Iceland prove reproducible.

Scientists have suspected that ground experiences changes prior to an earthquake—bottled water from a local well was tested before and after the Kobe quake in 1995, and researchers found differences, and similar results were found with well water before and after a quake in China in 1976—but both tests suffered from a lack of data, and because both were single incidents it was difficult to state with confidence if the water change and earthquakes were truly related. In this latest effort, the researchers took a much more systematic approach—they tested groundwater samples every week for the five year period 2008-2013 from an artesian well in the town of Húsavík, a place with a history of earthquakes. They found that levels of hydrogen and sodium in the water increased six months prior to a 5.6 magnitude earthquake in 2012 and again just prior to another 5.5 magnitude earthquake in 2013. Because of the length of the study, the researchers could rule out background variation, and because it happened twice, it offers more confidence that the changes to the water were not just connected to the earthquakes, but were likely caused by changes in the ground that led to the quakes.

The Húsavík-Flatey Fault holds Lake Botnvatn, near Húsavík town. Magnitude 5 earthquakes occurred along this fault in 2012 and 2013. Chemical changes were detected in groundwater before both of these earthquakes. Credit: Alasdair Skelton

As the researchers note, their findings do not mean a way to predict earthquakes has been found, instead it means that the same kind of experiment will have to be conducted in prone places around the world—if the same results are found, than testing stations can be set up, and perhaps, finally, we'll have a way to alert people to an impending disaster.

Explore further: Pair of seismologists publicly wonder if it might be possible to predict largest earthquakes

More information: Changes in groundwater chemistry before two consecutive earthquakes in Iceland, Nature Geoscience (2014) DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2250

Abstract
Groundwater chemistry has been observed to change before earthquakes and is proposed as a precursor signal. Such changes include variations in radon count rates, concentrations of dissolved elements and stable isotope ratios. Changes in seismic wave velocities6, water levels in boreholes, micro-seismicity8 and shear wave splitting9 are also thought to precede earthquakes. Precursor activity has been attributed to expansion of rock volume. However, most studies of precursory phenomena lack sufficient data to rule out other explanations unrelated to earthquakes. For example, reproducibility of a precursor signal has seldom been shown and few precursors have been evaluated statistically. Here we analyse the stable isotope ratios and dissolved element concentrations of groundwater taken from a borehole in northern Iceland between 2008 and 2013. We find that the chemistry of the groundwater changed four to six months before two greater than magnitude 5 earthquakes that occurred in October 2012 and April 2013. Statistical analyses indicate that the changes in groundwater chemistry were associated with the earthquakes. We suggest that the changes were caused by crustal dilation associated with stress build-up before each earthquake, which caused different groundwater components to mix. Although the changes we detect are specific for the site in Iceland, we infer that similar processes may be active elsewhere, and that groundwater chemistry is a promising target for future studies on the predictability of earthquakes.

Related Stories

Earthquakes over 5 magnitude shake Iceland volcano

August 24, 2014

Two earthquakes measuring over 5 in magnitude—the biggest yet—have shaken Iceland's Bardarbunga volcano after the country issued an aviation red alert warning that an ash-emitting eruption may be imminent.

Recommended for you

Thunderstorms spread mercury pollution

August 31, 2016

In the southern United States, an afternoon thunderstorm is part of a regular summer day. But new research shows those storms might be doing more than bringing some scary thunder and lightning.

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tscati
4.7 / 5 (3) Sep 22, 2014
"earthquakes cause massive damage and kill with astonishing regularity"

I think the problem is that they actually occur and kill with astonishing *irregularity*.
DistortedSignature
3 / 5 (2) Sep 22, 2014
@tscati You're applying the noun to the wrong subject...? (not a english major so I'm not sure how to word it). That phrase at the end of the sentence refers to how consistent earthquakes cause damage and kill *when they happen*, not about their timing/frequency. Although you can nitpick it and say that the sentence is still incorrect, since small earthquakes don't cause much damage or death regularly. It only states "earthquakes" and not "the urgency has only grown as large earthquakes with a magnitude greater than X.Y".

The next sentence in that paragraph shows acknowledgment that earthquakes are the sole natural disaster that scientists can't predict and give an effective warning ahead of time.
nilbud
5 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2014
Wow, if this works they could save thousands of lives a year.
Returners
1.8 / 5 (5) Sep 22, 2014
Wow, if this works they could save thousands of lives a year.


How?

most people can't just pack up and leave their home town for 6 months at a time. They'll lose their job, and they'll starve to death while they look for non-existent jobs somewhere else.

Unless they could figure out how to predict within a week or two when and where it will happen, it won't make much difference.
Uncle Ira
2.6 / 5 (5) Sep 22, 2014
@ Returnering-Skippy. After you tell that silly pine cone tale, aren't you just the little bit embarrassed for coming back with more foolishment?
Bob Osaka
not rated yet Sep 22, 2014
"Unfortunately, earthquakes remain the lone natural disaster where no warning can be given to those in soon impacted areas."
If only that were true. Meteors falling out of the blue give no warning despite the Near Earth Object Survey Act. Volcanoes appear out of the oceans and some on land erupt abruptly. Flash floods, landslides, avalanches, wildfires, solar flares, CME, gamma ray bursts all occur without prior detection.
This is an encouraging study, far more promising than Japanese funded "Catfish studies." Understanding the mechanisms of nature to the level of making accurate predictions is a worthy endeavor. Unfortunately, all natural disasters remain beyond our control and (thus far) impossible to avert.
Goika
Sep 22, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.