Re-examination of fukangichthys provides new insights into the evolution of early actinopteran fishes

July 16, 2014
Fig.1 Fukangichthys longidorsalis (A – C) and reconstruction (D). Scale bars equal 10 mm. Credit: XU Guang-hui

The scanilepiform ray-finned fish Fukangichthys longidorsalis, from the Middle Triassic non-marine Kelamayi Formation of Xinjiang, China, was previously described incompletely, with many of its morphological characteristics unnoticed or misidentified. A study published online July 08 in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34(4), presents a complete revision of this problematic taxon based on an extensive reexamination of the original fossil material, and provides new insights into the evolution of early actinopteran fishes, suggesting that the taxa used for divergence time calibrations in most molecular analyses need to be reconsidered.  

The Scanilepiformes are an extinct group of ray-finned fishes, known primarily from non-marine Triassic deposits in Asia and North America, with the exception of a single species, Scanilepis dubia, from the Rhetian (Late Triassic) marine deposits of Scania, Sweden. Fukangichthys longidorsalis was first reported in 1978 from the upper part of the Kelamayi Formation (formerly the Xiaoquangou Group) of Fukang, Xinjiang, and was known as the first scanilepiform from China. Evidence from tetrapod and plant fossils suggested that the Kelamayi Formation was deposited in a freshwater environment. 

Reaearchers observed the original fossil material of Fukangichthys longidorsalis, and recognized anatomical information unnoticed or misidentified previously, including a plate-like quadratojugal, a triangular dermohyal, a wedge-shaped angular, two infraorbitals, three supraorbitals, fringing fulcra on the pectoral fins, and conical, acrodin-capped teeth in the jaws.  

Results of a new phylogenetic analysis confirmed Fukangichthys as a scanilepiform within the Neopterygii, and provided new insights into the evolution of early actinopteran fishes. Cosmoptychius, previously regarded as the oldest stemgroup neopterygian, and Brachydegma, previously hypothesized to be the oldest halecomorph, are here reinterpreted as a stem-group actinopteran and a stem-group neopterygian, respectively. Additionally, Discoserra, previously hypothesized in a position close to the Holostei/Teleostei split, is now recovered in a clade with Ebenaqua, Bobasatrania and Platysomus gibbosus, and is therefore phylogenetically distant from crown neopterygians.  

Fig.2 New analysis showing phylogenetic relationships of Scanilepiformes within the broader context of the Actinopterygii. Credit: XU Guang-hui

Within the Actinopteri, most molecular analyses estimate the Chondrostei/Neopterygii split to be between 380 and 384 million years ago (Late Givetian to Early Frasnian,Middle to Late Devonian) and the Holostei/Teleostei split within the Neopterygii to be between 362 and 365 million years ago (Famennian, Late Devonian) based on calibrations from the fossil actinopterans Cosmoptychius and Brachydegma. "Morphological analyses have not reached a consensus on the timing of these splits, and phylogenetic relationships among early actinopterans remain highly unstable. The implication of this revised topology, in and around the split between the two principal extant actinopteran lineages, is that the taxa used for divergence time calibrations need to be reconsidered", said lead author Dr. XU Guang-hui of the IVPP. 

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Dr. GAO Ke-Qin, School of Earth and Space Sciences of Peking University, and Dr. John Finarelli, University College Dublin, Ireland, are other authors of the study.

Explore further: First-known ginglymodian fish found from the middle triassic of Eastern Yunnan Province, China

More information: Guang-Hui Xua, Ke-Qin Gao & John A. Finarelli. "A revision of the Middle Triassic scanilepiform fish Fukangichthys longidorsalis from Xinjiang, China, with comments on the phylogeny of the Actinopteri." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Volume 34, Issue 4, 2014.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?

August 28, 2015

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is 'just how good is the fossil record?' Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs ...

Fractals patterns in a drummer's music

August 28, 2015

Fractal patterns are profoundly human – at least in music. This is one of the findings of a team headed by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization in Göttingen and Harvard University ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.