Quantum tech disappoints, but only because we don't get it

Jul 16, 2014 by Pete Shadbolt, The Conversation
As hard to understand as the movie Matrix. Credit: jurvetson, CC BY

Over the next five years, the UK government will spend £270m on supporting research in "quantum technology". When budget announcements were made in 2013, provisions for offshore wind and shale gas extraction were received with raucous cheers, but the mention of quantum technology received a muted response. While we would expect any MP to have an informed opinion on energy or education, they might be forgiven for having less to say on an active field of scientific research with a fierce reputation for being difficult to understand.

Quantum technologies exploit the paradoxical and unfamiliar behaviour of tiny lumps of light and matter, including single atoms, electrons and photons. Using these "quanta" as building blocks, we can construct machines which exist in quantum "superposition" states. These states are so exotic and unfamiliar that they cannot be adequately described using simple language – we must resort to a mathematical description.

Machines based on these technologies are expected to dramatically outperform their classical counterparts in a variety of important tasks, including secure communication, computer simulation of atoms and molecules, precision measurement, code-breaking and quantitative analysis of "big data".

A recent study by Sciencewise, which is supported by the government's Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), found there were no opinion polls or surveys looking at the perceived social, ethical and technological impact of quantum technologies. Instead, they had to assess public opinion based on news, blog posts and online comments.

The promise of exotic and powerful new machines, coupled with the air of mystery often associated with , has made quantum technologies a topic of constant discussion in the mainstream press. In 2013, a wave of excitement was sparked by investment from global tech giant Google, the US space agency NASA and defence contractor Lockheed-Martin in the Canadian upstart D-Wave. More recently, documents leaked by Edward Snowden revealed an US$80M programme funded by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to develop a "cryptologically useful quantum computer".

Past press coverage of quantum technologies has often focused on their implications for privacy and cryptanalysis (used to reveal hidden information). Quantum technologies provide both a secret communication channel whose security is guaranteed by the laws of physics, using quantum cryptography, and a way to crack most existing methods, using quantum algorithms.

The latter raises security concerns that are relatively easy to convey. As more and more communication happens via digital channels, people are becoming aware of the risks surrounding their data. Revelations of government surveillance using advanced technologies have generated recent public debate.

Google has been proactive in publicising less well-known uses for , such as quantum simulation and machine learning. These applications arguably have greater potential than code-breaking, where side-channel attacks remain cheap and effective. A number of media reports address these ideas, but the complexity and diversity of these applications continues to present a significant challenge for the lay audience.

While strong public and private investment suggest practical quantum technologies are closer to market than ever before, the Sciencewise study notes a certain amount of pessimism in recent coverage. The authors identify a sense of frustration, in newspaper reports and online reader comments, over the idea that quantum computing has been "on the horizon" for more than a decade – and might stay there forever.

This attitude is exacerbated by the stereotype of quantum mechanics as extremely difficult to understand, which means that significant advances in the performance and capability of quantum hardware are often not reported. It does not help that the evaluation and verification of new quantum devices is difficult, even for experts in the field. This has led to a fierce and widely publicised debate over the veracity of D-wave's claimed quantum speedup.

At some point in the near future, it is very likely that quantum machines will have significant implications for our health, privacy, defence and environment. Based on the results of the Sciencewise study, there seems to be an urgent need to improve public understanding, from the existing fascination with the basic mechanisms and phenomena of quantum theory, to ethical and sociological questions.

Explore further: The road to quantum computing

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The road to quantum computing

May 15, 2014

Anticipating the advent of the quantum computer, related mathematical methods already provide insight into conventional computer science.

D-Wave and predecessors: From simulated to quantum annealing

Jun 23, 2014

The D-Wave computer is currently the latest link of a long chain of computers designed for the solution of optimization problems. In what sense does it realize quantum computation? We describe the evolution of such computers ...

Recommended for you

Quantum mechanics to charge your laptop?

Sep 18, 2014

Top scientists from UC Berkeley and MIT found the expertise they lacked at FIU. They invited Sakhrat Khizroev, a professor with appointments in both medicine and engineering, to help them conduct research ...

Physicists design zero-friction quantum engine

Sep 16, 2014

(Phys.org) —In real physical processes, some energy is always lost any time work is produced. The lost energy almost always occurs due to friction, especially in processes that involve mechanical motion. ...

Fluid mechanics suggests alternative to quantum orthodoxy

Sep 12, 2014

The central mystery of quantum mechanics is that small chunks of matter sometimes seem to behave like particles, sometimes like waves. For most of the past century, the prevailing explanation of this conundrum ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

George_Rajna
Jul 16, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
DoieaS
1 / 5 (1) Jul 17, 2014
Quantum tech disappoints, but only because we don't get it
Nope, it disapoints, because the research of quantum computers hype is driven with industrial lobby, which ignores the fact, the computational speed of quantum computers cannot beat this one of classical ones from the moment, when the computational power of classical computers is already limited with uncertainty principle. The uncertainty principle is quite objective limit of performance of quantum technologies, not just subjective one. The hype of quantum tech follows just from fact their proponents don't understand it well.