Darwin meets Newton: Evolution and the mass of the galaxy

Apr 07, 2014 by Magda Guglielmo, The Conversation
The Large Magellanic Cloud (right) visible in the southern sky is a nearby galaxy to our own. Credit: Flickr/Tracey Harrison Hill , CC BY-NC-ND

If the solution to a problem does not reveal itself straight away then why not let your initial guesswork evolve? That's the approach we've taken in trying to determine the mass of our galaxy by mapping the historic movement of two nearby galaxies.

Many of the 200 billion stars in our galaxy, known as the Milky Way, can be seen in a narrow band stretching across the night sky.

The southern night sky throws up more surprises, in the form of two indistinct, fuzzy blobs. Larger than the full moon, and often seen overhead, these are two galaxies in their own right, known as the Large and Small Clouds of Magellan.

But these Magellanic Clouds are caught in the gravitational grip of our much larger Milky Way, pulling them in their orbit. They are also attracted to each other, performing a dance about one another as they circle the Milky Way.

Seen through radio eyes, the Magellanic Clouds are no longer distinct but are sheathed in gas, joined by a prominent bridge of gas and have an extensive stream of gas following them in their orbit.

But how much of this rich structure is formed by their dance, and how much is the Milky Way playing a part? At present, this is unclear, but unravelling the complex history of the Clouds and their interaction with the Milky Way will reveal one of the key secrets of our own galaxy: namely, how massive it is.

While we have a rough idea to how much dark matter holds our Milky Way together, it is tricky to tie this down to a precise value. If we can understand the dynamical lives of the Clouds of Magellan, we may be able to do better.

Tracing the orbits of the Clouds

Through a range of techniques we've been able to accurately determine the distance to the Clouds is about 160,000 light years.

Through the Doppler effect, we've been able to measure the speeds of the two galaxies towards us, but measuring their velocity across the sky has proved much harder. Only in recent years, using the Hubble Space Telescope, have astronomers been able to measure the almost imperceptible shift in stars as the Clouds move in their orbits.

We know that both Clouds are moving with the gravitational pull of the Milky Way, and they are also attracted to each other.

So all we need to do is use the gravitational and dynamical equations by Isaac Newton and integrate these equations of motion back in time to tell us where the Clouds have come from.

A combined radio and visible-light image showing a long ribbon of gas called the Magellanic Stream, which stretches nearly halfway around the Milky Way. Credit: David L. Nidever, et al., NRAO/AUI/NSF and Mellinger, Leiden/Argentine/Bonn Survey, Parkes Observatory, Westerbork Observatory, and Arecibo Observatory

It might not be so simple

The size of a depends on the mass creating it but we are unsure of the actual mass of the Milky Way. Our estimates of the masses of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds are also uncertain.

How do we know what the correct masses actually are? If we choose the wrong ones, then the orbits we find, while they may be pretty, they will have very little to do with reality.

Let's complicate things a little bit more. In science all measurements come with an uncertainty, and that tricky measurement of the motion across the sky with the Hubble Space Telescope comes with a non-negligible uncertainty. Again, if we pick the wrong value, then what we get will have little to do with reality.

So, what's the solution? The solution is to try all plausible values of the positions, the velocities and the masses, and use rules derived from the genetics of evolution to breed the best solution.

Nature knows best

Evolution lives by Charles Darwin's creed "Survival of the fittest" so that with a population of individuals, inhabiting a certain environment, only those that are strong enough, or best suited to the living conditions, can survive.

These survival skills are encoded in their genes and are passed onto the next generation. Every so often, a changes the skill set, and fitter individuals can be added to a population.

So we can use a process known as genetic algorithms to mimic this evolutionary process.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
Watch through for the snake solution in genetic algorithms.

Each unknown value is encoded into a gene, with the expression of this gene, the phenotype, representing a realisation of a model. Each realisation will fit the data to a lesser or greater degree, and so we can take a scythe to the population, killing off the weaker ones and allowing the stronger ones to breed (that is, exchange chunks of their genes).

Throw in a random mutation here or there, by changing a value in a gene, and what you find is that subsequent generations of the population contain individuals that better and better fit the data.

The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds in their orbit about the Milky Way. Credit: NASA/CXC/SAO

Genetic algorithms have proved to be remarkably robust in optimising, finding excellent solutions when there are many variables to consider. This includes mimicking the evolution of animal movement, designing complex structures and machinery, and even stock trading.

For the problem of the Magellanic Clouds, we had to define what we mean by "better". Clearly, the Clouds should end up where we see then today, and be moving at the right speeds, but we also include extra observational evidence of their past interactions, especially bursts of star formation which can occur when two galaxies crash together.

The fittest survivor

With the genetic approach, we considered many thousands of the uncountable number of potential orbits of the Magellanic Clouds, breeding and mutating our populations to get the fittest. But how fit is the fittest?

Our best orbit accurately reproduces our observations, in terms of positions, velocities, previous star bursts and the location of the extensive gaseous stream.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

And the mass of the Milky Way? We've measured it at about 1,000 billion times the mass of our sun to an accuracy of 20%, and find it to be lighter than previous measurements that have tried to use the Clouds orbits.

Explore further: Hubble finds source of Magellanic Stream

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hubble finds source of Magellanic Stream

Aug 08, 2013

(Phys.org) —Astronomers using the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope have solved the 40-year-old mystery of the origin of the Magellanic Stream, a long ribbon of gas stretching nearly halfway around the Milky ...

Milky way sidelined in galactic tug of war

Sep 29, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Magellanic Stream is an arc of hydrogen gas spanning more than 100 degrees of the sky as it trails behind the Milky Way's neighbor galaxies, the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. Our ...

The Milky Way now has a twin (or two)

Aug 23, 2012

(Phys.org)—Research presented today at the International Astronomical Union General Assembly in Beijing has found the first group of galaxies that is just like ours, a rare sight in the local Universe.

Today in the Milky Way: Cloudy skies

Jul 02, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Adam Block of the UA's Mount Lemmon SkyCenter brings us a rare view of the clouds wafting through our Milky Way in this Astronomy Picture of the Day.

Hubble sees a vapor of stars

Jul 02, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Relatively few galaxies possess the sweeping, luminous spiral arms or brightly glowing center of our home galaxy the Milky Way. In fact, most of the Universe's galaxies look like small, amorphous ...

Recommended for you

Mysterious molecules in space

4 hours ago

Over the vast, empty reaches of interstellar space, countless small molecules tumble quietly though the cold vacuum. Forged in the fusion furnaces of ancient stars and ejected into space when those stars ...

Comet Jacques makes a 'questionable' appearance

Jul 28, 2014

What an awesome photo! Italian amateur astronomer Rolando Ligustri nailed it earlier today using a remote telescope in New Mexico and wide-field 4-inch (106 mm) refractor. Currently the brightest comet in ...

Image: Our flocculent neighbour, the spiral galaxy M33

Jul 28, 2014

The spiral galaxy M33, also known as the Triangulum Galaxy, is one of our closest cosmic neighbours, just three million light-years away. Home to some forty billion stars, it is the third largest in the ...

Image: Chandra's view of the Tycho Supernova remnant

Jul 25, 2014

More than four centuries after Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe first observed the supernova that bears his name, the supernova remnant it created is now a bright source of X-rays. The supersonic expansion of ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TulsaMikel
5 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2014
Maybe everything evolves. Even dimensions. Maybe the "big bang" is still contained in a single point somewhere? The last few billion years of expanding would be contained or exist at that point creating space internally from an outside observer.
Gerald001
5 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2014
Actually, there is already a very interesting published work that joins cosmology and evolutionary theory called, "The Evolution of Simulated Universes". The author, Solomon, contends how our own Universe could easily be the product of selection and evolutionary forces.
Bob Osaka
5 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2014
Change is the one immutable force in the universe endlessly continuous. Interesting using biodiversity algorithms to help explain astronomical events. In life forms closer examination reveals slight variations making each individual unique. The periodic table of elements is composed of the most commonly found isotopes, each with variations. Someday we may discover that each atom, every quark and boson is also uniquely individualistic. It's a paradox: We're all the same because we're all different. We are all one with the universe and the universe is all one.

Whatever we understand today that understanding is likely to change.
vidyunmaya
1 / 5 (3) Apr 10, 2014
Evolution needs to catch-up with creation does not mean super-imposed Ignorance.
You have beautiful milky-way data. This tallies with what I projected in a diagram in my book
OM Cosmic consciousness to cosmology Revision-2000- TXU 982-559 author Vidyardhi nanduri- Part of this is presented at COSPAR 2013. in my research Papers-
Frames of Mind: Human Beings have various frames of Mind.1.Biological Frame 2.Philosophical Frame 3. Divine Frame 4.Nature Divine Frame and 5. Cosmic Divine Frame
see cosmology Vedas interlinks-Books