Prospective carbon capture site lacks ceiling

Jan 31, 2014 by Geoff Vivian
Prospective carbon capture site lacks ceiling
Hugo Olierook says the site was chosen because of its proximity to the Collie coal-fired power station: sequestering its CO2 emissions there would minimise transport costs. Image: Andy D'Agorne

Researchers' early attempts to find a Perth Basin site to sequester carbon have detected a suitable porous aquifer, but they are yet to find a non-porous cap rock to contain it.

Curtin University geologist Hugo Olierook says saline water aquifers, in porous stone, are considered suitable for carbon capture and storage (CCS) if they have a layer of impermeable cap rock above.

He has been analysing the results of the Geological Survey of Western Australia's core and wire line drilling at the "Harvey 1" well near Harvey in WA's South West.

"It was my job together with Nick Timms and Claudio Delle Piane to try and log this core," he says.

"First order of business was to understand the geology, whether it was suitable at all for CO2 sequestration.

"That included logging the sedimentology.

"Later on, we did some sampling and with those samples analyse the porosity and the permeability.

"We were trying to essentially figure out how much porous base we have in our reservoir and how impermeable our cap was."

He says the site was chosen because of its proximity to the Collie coal-fired power station: sequestering its CO2 emissions there would minimise transport costs.

A layer of impermeable cap rock was also thought to rise at that point, forming a dome-like structure.

Core sampling, which began at an 895-metre depth due to budget constraints, detected none of the expected .

He says it may have been present at a shallower depth – and was therefore undetected – or had eroded away.

Analysis of the Lesueur Sandstone aquifer yielded more encouraging early results.

"It's got high porosity and permeability…when you pump it into the ground it can quickly disperse into the surrounding rock," he says.

"The Yarragadee aquifer which provides most of Perth's groundwater is eroded off there, there's no drinking water as such.

"If CO2 did escape by accident at least it wouldn't pollute the groundwater.

"We're planning on at least drilling three more holes and hopefully using one of those holes.

"Unfortunately, due to them missing the caprock, that's a bit of unknown for us.

"In other parts of the Perth Basin, this caprock is I think at least a several hundred meters thick."

His research will form part of a larger investigation into Perth Basin as a site for carbon sequestration, coordinated by CSIRO scientist Dr Linda Stalker.

Explore further: Researchers size up aquifer to capture carbon

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Trapping Greenhouse Gases (Without Leaks)

Nov 19, 2008

Of all the possible ways of reducing future greenhouse gas emissions, one of the most immediately feasible is carbon dioxide "sequestration," which involves compressing the gas into a liquid and piping it deep underground ...

Chemistry curbs spreading of carbon dioxide

May 06, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- The presence of even a simple chemical reaction can delay or prevent the spreading of stored carbon dioxide in underground aquifers, new research from the University of Cambridge has revealed.

Recommended for you

Bridgmanite: World's most abundant mineral finally named

15 hours ago

A team of geologists in the U.S. has finally found an analyzable sample of the most abundant mineral in the world allowing them to give it a name: bridgmanite. In their paper published in the journal Science, the te ...

Volcano in south Japan erupts, disrupting flights

22 hours ago

A volcano in southern Japan is blasting out chunks of magma in the first such eruption in 22 years, causing flight cancellations and prompting warnings to stay away from its crater.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bradshaw_john
not rated yet Feb 03, 2014
This would be a tragedy if the geological outcome of this site wasn't known prior to $8mill of tax payers money being spent on this folly.

In 2003, geologists from Geoscience Australia wrote:
Onshore South Perth Basin Geological Sequestration Potential
The onshore South Perth Basin is a poor location for the geological sequestration of CO2. Although the area contains abundant reservoir sandstones and several large unfaulted anticlines, the area suffers through lack of vertical seals (Crostella and Backhouse, 2000). Permian and Triassic age marine shales which form regional seals in the onshore North Perth Basin grade into continental sandstones to the south. Cretaceous age marine shales which form vertical seals in the offshore South Perth Basin pinchout near the Badaminna Fault system and are absent onshore.

So what makes these guys so "special" to think they know better than the actual data. As a result this money has been totally wasted on a known failure outcome.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.