Researchers suggest comet most likely cause of Chicxulub crater

Mar 25, 2013 by Bob Yirka report
The 'Great Comet' of 1996, Hyakutake. Image credit: NASA

(Phys.org) —Researchers from Dartmouth College in the U.S. as part of their presentation at the 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference this past week, have given evidence that suggests it was a comet that struck the Earth approximately 65 million years ago creating the Chicxulub crater—an event most scientists agree was likely the cause behind the demise of land dwelling dinosaurs. Up till now most in the field have believed that it was likely an asteroid that caused the crater and disruption that followed.

The 180 km wide exists in the ocean near the in Mexico, it was first discovered in 1978 and since that time, a lot of research has been undertaken to determine if what caused it was what caused the dinosaurs to go extinct. Researchers found that a layer of iridium was formed over the Earth's surface as a result of the explosive impact—so great was it, that much of its mass was thrown back up into the atmosphere all across the globe. The layer, known as the Cretaceous- (K-Pg) boundary has been the source of a lot of debate. In this new effort, the team suggests that as much as 75 percent of the object that struck the Earth wound up in the atmosphere and eventually fell to the ground.

Measuring the thickness of the K-Pg boundary allows scientists to calculate the size of the object, and in this case, the researchers say there isn't enough material to support the notion of an —because they, as a rule, tend to move much less slowly than comets. A fast moving, but much smaller comet, they say, could very easily account for both the amount of iridium and the large crater size. The group has based their assertions on new research into the levels of that is also found in the K-Pg boundary, but in smaller amounts. It's enough they say, to suggest that more of the object that struck the Earth wound up in the atmosphere than has been previously thought, which means the likelihood of it being from an asteroid impact is not supported.

This new research comes just a month after another team published a paper suggesting it was binary asteroids that caused the Chicxulub crater.

The researchers acknowledge that their findings can't prove that the object that struck the Earth was a comet (some of the debris might have gone back into space, etc.), but it does offer compelling evidence, which has some space scientists worried—there are far more such comets in our solar system than asteroids. If another comet were to strike, we now have a pretty good picture of what that would entail.

Explore further: Getting to the root of the problem in space

More information: www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2013/

Related Stories

New Blow for Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Theory

Apr 27, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The enduringly popular theory that the Chicxulub crater holds the clue to the demise of the dinosaurs, along with some 65 percent of all species 65 million years ago, is challenged in a paper ...

Rutgers scientists: Asteroids did kill the dinosaurs

Nov 29, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Sometimes, you just can’t trust the iridium. A silvery-white natural metal that’s a member of the platinum family, iridium is a key ingredient in the manufacture of spark plugs. ...

Recommended for you

Getting to the root of the problem in space

10 hours ago

When we go to Mars, will astronauts be able to grow enough food there to maintain a healthy diet? Will they be able to produce food in NASA's Orion spacecraft on the year-long trip to Mars? How about growing ...

The difference between CMEs and solar flares

12 hours ago

This is a question we are often asked: what is the difference between a coronal mass ejection (CME) and a solar flare? We discussed it in a recent astrophoto post, but today NASA put out a video with amazing graphics that explain ...

Scientific instruments of Rosetta's Philae lander

12 hours ago

When traveling to far off lands, one packs carefully. What you carry must be comprehensive but not so much that it is a burden. And once you arrive, you must be prepared to do something extraordinary to make ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Huffman
1 / 5 (1) Mar 25, 2013
See Pareto Distribution.
illicited
not rated yet Mar 25, 2013
much less slowly? meaning faster than comets??