Show on Jesus' wife papyrus delayed amid doubts

October 1, 2012

The Smithsonian Channel says the premiere of its documentary on a papyrus fragment that purports to show Jesus referring to his wife is being delayed until further tests can be done.

Research about the fourth-century Coptic papyrus fragment was released last month by Harvard Divinity School professor Karen King. She said it didn't prove Jesus was married, only that some early believed he was.

Scholars immediately raised about its and questioned its lack of known archaeological provenance.

The documentary was scheduled to debut Sept. 30. But the channel's general manager says it will be delayed "until the document undergoes additional tests."

Tom Hayden says the program will consider such doubts and the results of the tests. He said that will make for a "more complete story."

Explore further: Experts split on supposed Jesus tomb

0 shares

Related Stories

Experts split on supposed Jesus tomb

January 18, 2008

Archaeologists, biblical scholars and other experts met in Jerusalem this week to discuss a tomb that might be that of Jesus and his family.

Age test of Shroud of Turin planned

February 25, 2008

A British scientist is overseeing new tests on the Shroud of Turin that he says will show it dates to the time of Jesus of Nazareth.

Scholar: Jesus talks of wife in ancient script

September 18, 2012

(AP)—A Harvard University professor has unveiled a fourth century fragment of papyrus that she says is the only existing ancient text that quotes Jesus explicitly referring to having a wife.

Harvard not yet publishing claim Jesus had wife

September 22, 2012

Harvard University says it hasn't committed to publishing research that purportedly shows some early Christians believed Jesus had a wife even though its divinity school touted the research during a publicity blitz this week.

Recommended for you

Early human diet explains our eating habits

August 31, 2015

Much attention is being given to what people ate in the distant past as a guide to what we should eat today. Advocates of the claimed palaeodiet recommend that we should avoid carbohydrates and load our plates with red meat ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

defactoseven
not rated yet Oct 02, 2012
It's the battle of the dogmas. You can't prove something with nothing. You can't divide by 0. They keep on trying as hard as they can to make 0 go into something...
Caliban
1 / 5 (1) Oct 02, 2012
You would think that the Smithsonian would already be in possession of the lowdown on this scrap of papyrus, since it is just the sort of thing that is the Institution's stock-in-trade.

But that's what you get for thinking.

I'm sure that The Smithsonian Channel is or will be just as stupid, pandering, sensationalistic, and inconsequential as NatGeo.

And if not, I'm sure they could become so --if they will only try a little harder.

We certainly don't want to challenge the great unwashed with facts accurately reported in the style of quality journalism!

No, the Smithsonian Channel is more properly viewed as just another marketing conduit and, as such, exists merely to
sell those ultra hi-tech never-again-buy-another-pair houseslippers(etc) to generate that ad revenue.

You know --because of fiscal austerity, and all...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.