Show on Jesus' wife papyrus delayed amid doubts

October 1, 2012

The Smithsonian Channel says the premiere of its documentary on a papyrus fragment that purports to show Jesus referring to his wife is being delayed until further tests can be done.

Research about the fourth-century Coptic papyrus fragment was released last month by Harvard Divinity School professor Karen King. She said it didn't prove Jesus was married, only that some early believed he was.

Scholars immediately raised about its and questioned its lack of known archaeological provenance.

The documentary was scheduled to debut Sept. 30. But the channel's general manager says it will be delayed "until the document undergoes additional tests."

Tom Hayden says the program will consider such doubts and the results of the tests. He said that will make for a "more complete story."

Explore further: Experts split on supposed Jesus tomb


Related Stories

Experts split on supposed Jesus tomb

January 18, 2008

Archaeologists, biblical scholars and other experts met in Jerusalem this week to discuss a tomb that might be that of Jesus and his family.

Age test of Shroud of Turin planned

February 25, 2008

A British scientist is overseeing new tests on the Shroud of Turin that he says will show it dates to the time of Jesus of Nazareth.

Scholar: Jesus talks of wife in ancient script

September 18, 2012

(AP)—A Harvard University professor has unveiled a fourth century fragment of papyrus that she says is the only existing ancient text that quotes Jesus explicitly referring to having a wife.

Harvard not yet publishing claim Jesus had wife

September 22, 2012

Harvard University says it hasn't committed to publishing research that purportedly shows some early Christians believed Jesus had a wife even though its divinity school touted the research during a publicity blitz this week.

Recommended for you

Who you gonna trust? How power affects our faith in others

October 6, 2015

One of the ongoing themes of the current presidential campaign is that Americans are becoming increasingly distrustful of those who walk the corridors of power – Exhibit A being the Republican presidential primary, in which ...

Ancient genome from Africa sequenced for the first time

October 8, 2015

The first ancient human genome from Africa to be sequenced has revealed that a wave of migration back into Africa from Western Eurasia around 3,000 years ago was up to twice as significant as previously thought, and affected ...

From a very old skeleton, new insights on ancient migrations

October 9, 2015

Three years ago, a group of researchers found a cave in Ethiopia with a secret: it held the 4,500-year-old remains of a man, with his head resting on a rock pillow, his hands folded under his face, and stone flake tools surrounding ...

Mexican site yields new details of sacrifice of Spaniards

October 9, 2015

It was one of the worst defeats in one of history's most dramatic conquests: Only a year after Hernan Cortes landed in Mexico, hundreds of people in a Spanish-led convey were captured, sacrificed and apparently eaten.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Oct 02, 2012
It's the battle of the dogmas. You can't prove something with nothing. You can't divide by 0. They keep on trying as hard as they can to make 0 go into something...
1 / 5 (1) Oct 02, 2012
You would think that the Smithsonian would already be in possession of the lowdown on this scrap of papyrus, since it is just the sort of thing that is the Institution's stock-in-trade.

But that's what you get for thinking.

I'm sure that The Smithsonian Channel is or will be just as stupid, pandering, sensationalistic, and inconsequential as NatGeo.

And if not, I'm sure they could become so --if they will only try a little harder.

We certainly don't want to challenge the great unwashed with facts accurately reported in the style of quality journalism!

No, the Smithsonian Channel is more properly viewed as just another marketing conduit and, as such, exists merely to
sell those ultra hi-tech never-again-buy-another-pair houseslippers(etc) to generate that ad revenue.

You know --because of fiscal austerity, and all...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.