Researchers suggest speedy growth of early black holes may have inhibited the growth of others

Jun 11, 2012 by Bob Yirka weblog
This artist's concept shows a galaxy with a supermassive black hole at its core. The black hole is shooting out jets of radio waves. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

(Phys.org) -- A trio of astrophysicists is theorizing that the reason that there is not a larger variety of black hole sizes in the known universe is because those that were spawned first heated up the universe to the extent that it stunted the growth of others. The team members: Takamitsu Tanaka, Rosalba Perna and Zoltán Haiman outline their ideas in their paper they’ve uploaded to the preprint arXiv. In it they suggest that the black holes that formed soonest after the Big Band, pulled in enormous quantities of gas and emitted huge amounts of x-rays; enough they say to heat up the universe, preventing other black holes from growing larger.

The current thinking regarding black holes is that unfathomably huge black holes that weighed billions of times as much as our sun, came into existence before the universe was even a billion years old. One snag to this idea however, has been that logically speaking, there should have also been black holes of many sizes, from the super huge, to the relatively small. And because that doesn’t appear to have happened, the thinking goes, something must have stunted the growth of other black holes leaving most of them very small in comparison. That something, the research trio suggests, was the speedy development of just a few early black holes that started out very small (just tens of times the mass of our sun) but then grew very rapidly to super size, sucking gas at a rate that would be difficult to fathom. In their early stages, black holes need cool gas to grow, but because the giant black holes that came before them emitted such a huge amount of x-rays, the whole universe was heated as a result, leaving the newer black holes with little cool gas to grow, and as a result they remained relatively small.

The end result, the team says, was the formation of relatively few supermassive , as they are more formally known, and many more of the smaller ones that are observable today by , and astronomers seeking to understand the mysteries of the known .

Explore further: Is the universe finite or infinite?

More information: X-ray emission from high-redshift miniquasars: self-regulating the population of massive black holes through global warming, arXiv:1205.6467v1 [astro-ph.CO] arxiv.org/abs/1205.6467v1

Abstract
Observations of high-redshift quasars at z>6 imply that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with masses over 10^{9}Modot were in place less than 1 Gyr after the Big Bang. If these SMBHs assembled from "seed" BHs left behind by the first stars, then they must have accreted gas at close to the Eddington limit during a large fraction (>50%) of the time. A generic problem with this scenario, however, is that the mass density in Msim10^{6}Modot SMBHs at z 6 already exceeds the locally observed SMBH mass density by several orders of magnitude. In order to avoid this overproduction, BH seed formation and growth must become significantly less efficient in less massive protogalaxies, while proceeding uninterrupted in the most massive galaxies that formed first. Using Monte-Carlo realizations of the merger and growth history of BHs, we show that X-rays from the earliest accreting BHs can provide such a feedback mechanism. Our calculations paint a self-consistent picture of black-hole-made climate change, in which the first miniquasars - among them the ancestors of the z 6 quasar SMBHs - globally warm the IGM and suppress the formation and growth of subsequent generations of BHs. We present two specific models with global miniquasar feedback that provide excellent agreement with recent estimates of the z=6 SMBH mass function. For each of these models, we estimate the rate of BH mergers at z>6 that could be detected by the proposed gravitational-wave observatory eLISA/NGO.

via Newscientist

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Could primordial black holes be dark matter?

Sep 21, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- “We know that about 25% of the matter in the universe is dark matter, but we don’t know what it is,” Michael Kesden tells PhysOrg.com. “There are a number of different theories about what da ...

Black Holes Lead Galaxy Growth

Jan 06, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers may have solved a cosmic chicken-and-egg problem -- the question of which formed first in the early Universe -- galaxies or the supermassive black holes seen at their cores.

Recommended for you

Is the universe finite or infinite?

6 hours ago

Two possiblities exist: either the Universe is finite and has a size, or it's infinite and goes on forever. Both possibilities have mind-bending implications.

'Teapot' nova begins to wane

8 hours ago

A star, or nova, has appeared in the constellation of Sagittarius and, even though it is now waning, it is still bright enough to be visible in the sky over Perth through binoculars or a telescope.

Dark matter is darker than once thought

9 hours ago

This panel of images represents a study of 72 colliding galaxy clusters conducted by a team of astronomers using NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and Hubble Space Telescope. The research sets new limits on ...

Galaxy clusters collide—dark matter still a mystery

Mar 26, 2015

When galaxy clusters collide, their dark matters pass through each other, with very little interaction. Deepening the mystery, a study by scientists at EPFL and the University of Edinburgh challenges the ...

Using 19th century technology to time travel to the stars

Mar 26, 2015

In the late 19th century, astronomers developed the technique of capturing telescopic images of stars and galaxies on glass photographic plates. This allowed them to study the night sky in detail. Over 500,000 ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobPaulG
1 / 5 (5) Jun 11, 2012
Did they really mention global warming in the title of this abstract? WTF...
chardo137
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 11, 2012
They are talking about the environment of the early universe, billions of years ago.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.