Debate still raging on site for super-telescope

Mar 23, 2012
An artist impression released by the SPDO shows dishes of the future Square Kilometre Array radio telescope. An international consortium planning to build the world's most powerful radiotelescope is still debating whether South Africa or Australia should host the $2 billion project.

An international consortium planning to build the world's most powerful radiotelescope is still debating whether South Africa or Australia should host the $2 billion project, an official said Friday.

Scientists hope the , or SKA, will shed new light on fundamental questions about the universe, including how it began, why it is expanding and whether it contains life beyond our planet.

The SKA board of directors met Monday in Manchester, England, where the project is headquartered, to discuss the still-secret recommendation of the best host for the hundreds of antennas that will pick up faint signals from across the universe.

"We don't really know" when the final decision will come, Bernie Fanaroff, director of SKA Africa, told AFP.

The board on Monday agreed to pass the site recommendation to the members of the consortium, which is set to meet on April 3 in Amsterdam, it said in a statement on its website.

"It is not likely that this meeting will make a final decision on the site; rather it will be the start of a process of discussion and negotiation between the members," it said.

A decision had been expected on April 4.

If South Africa wins the bidding, engineers will connect antennas in the arid Karoo region by remote link to a network of dishes stretching across southern and eastern Africa and as far away as Ghana.

Australia's bid puts the core site at Mileura station, about 100 kilometres (60 miles) west of Meekathara in . Other antennas would be distributed across Australia and New Zealand.

The new instrument will be 50 to 100 times more sensitive than today's most powerful .

Explore further: Virtual reality system simulates the International Space Station

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

European Data Relay System on track

1 hour ago

The first component of Europe's space data highway passed several critical tests this summer replicating the harsh launch and space conditions it will soon have to endure.

Student science projects explode with rocket

4 hours ago

Eighteen groups of students have lost science projects that were onboard an unmanned rocket that exploded in Virginia after taking off for the International Space Station.

Russian rocket engines suspected in launch blast

14 hours ago

Crews searched for scorched wreckage along the Virginia coast Wednesday in hopes of determining why an unmanned commercial rocket exploded in a blow to NASA's strategy of using private companies to send supplies ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeddy_Mctedder
2.8 / 5 (4) Mar 23, 2012
What is this nuts? Australia no question. You dont. Build large capital projects in politically unstable countries with unstable bordering neighbors
Au-Pu
5 / 5 (1) Mar 24, 2012
I would agree with the previous post.
For an investment of that size you need a stable political environment and an absence of potential invaders.
Nowhere in Africa can you provide this.
The indecision makes no sense unless the siting is going to be based upon some sort of political agenda.
I could understand if there was debate between Australia and South America, but Australia and Africa, it is ludicrous.
alfie_null
not rated yet Mar 25, 2012
Is South Africa that unstable? Is there some concern they might be invaded?
I'd be interested to know what are the decision criteria. It's likely more than just politics. Probably stuff like internet connectivity, or reliable electrical power.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.