US income distribution winners and losers

Feb 28, 2012

People all over the world have spent almost six months in front of universities, public parks, banks, and even Wall Street to publicly protest their dissatisfaction with economic inequality. But how much disparity really exists between the rich and poor in the United States? According to a new study, it might be more than you would think.

A recent study published in the Review of Radical Political Economics (published by SAGE), analyzed surveys of US households from the late 1990's and early 2000's. The author looked at differences among quintiles (or fifths of the U.S. population according to gross income) and found that when the U.S. prospers, there is an uphill flow of income to households in the upper quintiles while the majority of households in middle and lower income quintiles do not see an increase in income at all. This of course affects US households when the economy slows down.

According to the author, the data suggests that "those in the bottom…appear to be stuck there, and in some cases even sliding further into the depths of poverty, further negating the optimistic outcomes postulated by conventional economic thinking."

The author analyzed data from surveys of over 60,000 U.S. households that were taken periodically from 1996 to 2003. He notes that throughout these years, U.S. households had to adjust to some substantial changes in the economy from times of surplus and low unemployment rates to times when the economy slowed down substantially. Interestingly, when the economy of the U.S. prospered in the 1990s, only the incomes of richer households appeared to reflect this growth.

"It can be argued that households in the upper portion of the income distribution are better positioned, or even favored, to reap the benefits from growth, further widening the income gap between rich and poor," wrote the author.

Conversely, the author wrote that even in times of economic prosperity, poorer classes have limited access to resources that would improve their position. For example, while technological advances spur economic growth, they do not benefit all households equally.

"The data imply that the U.S. economy is not one of mobility and opportunity," wrote the author. "Richer households are getting richer, the poorer households are staying poor, and those middle-income continue to move about chasing the elusive American dream."

Explore further: Study shows banks that have good working relationships with their customers reduce loan defaults

More information: The article entitled "Who are the Winners and the Losers? Transitions in the U.S. Household Income Distribution" from the Review of Radical Political Economics is available free for a limited time at: rrp.sagepub.com/content/43/4/467.full.pdf+html

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Chinese-Americans don't overborrow, study finds

Oct 17, 2011

Bad mortgage loans and rampant consumer debt were two of the primary causes for the recent economic recession in the U.S. Despite a national trend of debt problems, a University of Missouri researcher has found one American ...

Callers of all incomes ditching landlines for cell

Dec 16, 2009

(AP) -- The number of households with cell phones but no landlines continues to grow, but the recession doesn't seem to be forcing poor cellular users to abandon their traditional wired phones any faster than higher-income ...

Indian economic miracle bypasses rural poor

Mar 18, 2008

A study of disadvantaged groups in rural India - which make up over 24 per cent of the population - has shed light on why the country' s economic success has largely passed them by.

Recommended for you

'Patent trolls' jeopardize innovation, study finds

Sep 23, 2014

(Phys.org) —New research co-authored by a Naveen Jindal School of Management accounting professor suggests that companies that don't manufacture goods or products but sue companies that do threaten innovation and economic ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

exprnc
not rated yet Feb 28, 2012
Compare the curves for CPI and the amount of purchasing media [$] in circulation to the rise in income of the top 1% and the general population. The top 1% is hardly keeping up with true inflation [increase of purchasing media]. The rest of us are supposed to live with CPI and minimum wages where there is no inflation -- official gov. numbers!