Russia's space chief says failures may be sabotage

January 10, 2012 By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV , Associated Press

Russia's space chief says failures may be sabotage (AP)

Enlarge

In this Wednesday, Nov. 9, 2011 file photo, the Zenit-2SB rocket with the Phobos-Ground probe blasts off from its launch pad at the Cosmodrome Baikonur, Kazakhstan. Some of the recent failures of Russian spacecraft may have been caused by hostile interference, Roscosmos chief Vladimir Popovkin said. Popovkin made the comment when asked about the failure of the unmanned Phobos-Ground probe, which was to explore one of the Mars twin moons, Phobos, but became stranded while orbiting Earth after its Nov. 9 launch. The spacecraft is expected to fall to Earth around Jan. 15. (AP Photo/Oleg Urusov, Pool, File)

(AP) -- Some recent Russian satellite failures may have been the result of sabotage by foreign forces, Russia's space chief said Tuesday, in comments apparently aimed at the United States.

Roscosmos chief Vladimir Popovkin stopped short of accusing any specific country of disabling Russian satellites, but in an interview in the daily Izvestia he said some Russian craft had suffered "unexplained" malfunctions while flying over another side of the globe beyond the reach of his nation's tracking facilities.

Popovkin spoke when asked about the failure of the $170-million unmanned Phobos-Ground probe, which was to explore one of Mars' two moons, Phobos, but became stranded while orbiting Earth after its Nov. 9 launch. Engineers in Russia and the have failed to propel the spacecraft toward Mars, and it is expected to fall back to Earth around Jan. 15.

spokesman Alexei Kuznetsov refused to elaborate on Popovkin's comments, which marked the first time a senior Russian government official has claimed that foreign sabotage has been used to disable one of the country's satellites.

Popovkin said modern technology makes spacecraft vulnerable to foreign influences.

"I wouldn't like to accuse anyone, but today there exists powerful means to influence spacecraft, and their use can't be excluded," he said.

James Oberg, a veteran who has written books on the Russian space program and now works as a space consultant, said Popovkin's comments were a sad example of the Russian cultural instinct to 'blame foreigners.'

"It's a feature of trajectories that orbital adjustments must be made halfway around the first orbit to circularize and stabilize subsequent orbits," Oberg said in e-mailed comments.

"The Russians must know that simple geography - not evildoers lurking in shadows - dictate where their communications 'blind spots' are. But the urge to shift blame seems strong," he said.

The failed Phobos mission was the latest in a series of recent Russian launch failures that have raised concerns about the condition of the country's space industries and raised pressure on Popovkin. officials have blamed the failures on obsolete equipment and an aging work force.

Popovkin also said in 2013, Russia will launch three new communications satellites that will be able to retransmit signals from other Russian spacecraft as they fly over another hemisphere.

A retired Russian general alleged last November that the Phobos-Ground might have been incapacitated by a powerful U.S. radar. Nikolai Rodionov, who previously was in charge of Russia's early warning system, was quoted as saying that a powerful electromagnetic impulse generated by U.S. radar in Alaska might have affected the probe's control system.

Popovkin said experts have so far failed to determine why the Phobos-Ground probe's engines failed to fire, but admitted the program had suffered from funding shortages that led to some "risky technological solutions."

The spacecraft was supposed to collect soil samples on Phobos and fly them back to Earth in one of the most challenging unmanned interplanetary missions ever. It was Russia's first foray beyond the Earth since a botched 1996 robotic mission to Mars, which failed when the probe crashed shortly after the launch due to an engine failure.

Scientists had hoped that studies of Phobos' surface could help solve the mystery of its origin and shed more light on the genesis of the solar system. Some believe the crater-dented moon is an asteroid captured by Mars' gravity, while others think it's a piece of debris from when Mars collided with another celestial object.

©2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

3.8 /5 (5 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Malyuta_Skuratov
Jan 10, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Yep, let's fight the global warming with an appropriately cold war.
Callippo
Jan 10, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
It's always easier to cover incompetence with accusation of some hidden/external enemy. On the graphs bellow are comparison of success rate of USA and Russian spaceprobes of Mars.

http://www.aether...tory.gif
Callippo
Jan 10, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
Background data of this statistics, if someone is interested about it (in Czech only, sorry). In the light of these statistics the poor Phobos-Ground probe had only 16% chance of success.

http://www.aether...ory1.gif
Xbw
Jan 10, 2012

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
An ancient demotivational poster once said, "The secret to success is knowing who to blame".
Blakut
Jan 10, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
Yeah, they're trying to cover their asses allright. But they don't have who to blame specifically. How could one disable their software remotely?
Callippo
Jan 10, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
The interesting thing is, the Russian managed missions are substantially more reliable - which is somehow surprising with respect to the size and much higher complexity of managed flights. Well, one could said, when the Americans are on the board, the HAARP radars are dimmed for sure..
kevinrtrs
Jan 11, 2012

Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
"The Russians must know that simple geography - not evildoers lurking in shadows - dictate where their communications 'blind spots' are. But the urge to shift blame seems strong," he said.

Strange how the Russians seem to have been quite successful in their other launches. I'm sure they were aware of the need to adjust orbits, otherwise they'd have to be simpletons.
I must confess I also strongly suspected outside interference the day that the news was announced. I still do, because the Russians have far too much experience with more critical missions to slip up so badly - in spite of "new technological risks".
BenjaminButton
Jan 11, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
@kevinrtrs: True the Russians have experience but the man said himself that their space agency has for a long time suffered serious funding shortages. The Phobos- grunt probe also cost a mere $170 million...that's pennies compared to what NASA spend on their missions. How is it unreasonable to assume that an underfunded space agency plagued by a paranoid propagandist govt. which vilifies it's scientists on a regular basis would eventually see a series of major errors?
antialias_physorg
Jan 11, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
On the other hand: given the latest string of misshaps it would be foolhardy NOT to think in the direction of Sabotage - at least as one of several possibilities.

This statement may just be a test-balloon. Trying to povoke some telling reaction from a possibly guilty party (US, China, ... )
yyz
Jan 11, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"Trying to povoke some telling reaction from a possibly guilty party (US, China, ... )"

Wouldn't that make the US and/or China incredibly clever (or really stupid), seeing both countries had experiments aboard Phobos-Grunt!

http://en.wikiped...periment

http://en.wikiped...inghuo-1
antialias_physorg
Jan 11, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
Just for the sake of argument (i.e. let's just hypothesize it was sabotage for the moment)

There are a lot of possible parties that could have an interest in doing so. Nation states are just one of them. Fledgeling commercial carriers may also be involved. Heck, it could even be some rival faction withing Roskosmos that wants to take it over.

As for the experiments aboard the craft: Such cooperation happens on the level of NASA/Roskosmos - not on a political level. Political agendas may be at odds (and often are) with scientific ones. We shouldn't assume that any nation is so streamlined so as to expect that every part of its apparat knows (and supports) everything every other part does.
Rank 3.8 /5 (5 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Distance of planets from stars and revolution
    created8 hours ago
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Space & Earth / Environment

created 6 hours ago | popularity 3.8 / 5 (4) | comments 5 | with audio podcast

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 8 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (5) | comments 20 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 8 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (4) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.8 / 5 (11) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (15) | comments 41


Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure

Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure – about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair – and you'll probably recognise its shape.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages

Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.