Impact mitigation
August 15, 2011 By Steve Nerlich, Universe Today
The Don Quijote mission, which may launch by 2015. The Sancho spacecraft will orbit an asteroid, collecting data as another spacecraft Hidalgo collides with that asteroid, in an attempt to alter its trajectory. Credit: ESA.
The save-the-Earth rehearsal mission Don Quijote, commissioned by the European Space Agency, is planned to test the potential of a real life-or-death mission to deflect a mass-extinction-inducing asteroid from a collision course with Earth.
Currently at concept stage, the Don Quijote Near Earth Asteroid Impact Mitigation Mission has been modelled on a proposed flight to either 2002 AT4 or 1989 ML, both being near-Earth asteroids, though neither represent an obvious collision risk. However, subsequent studies have proposed that Amor 2003 SM84 or even 99942 Apophis may be more suitable targets. After all, 99942 Apophis does carry a marginal (1 in 250,000) risk of an Earth impact in 2036.
Whatever the target, a dual launch of two spacecraft is proposed an Impactor called Hidalgo (a title Cervantes gave to the original Don Quixote) and an Orbiter called Sancho (who was the Dons faithful companion).
While the Impactors role is self-explanatory, the Orbiter plays a key role in interpreting the impact the idea being to collect impact momentum and trajectory change data that would then inform future missions, in which the fate of the Earth may really be at stake.
The extent of transfer of momentum from Impactor to asteroid depends on the Impactors mass (just over 500 kilograms) and its velocity (about 10 kilometres a second), as well as the composition and density of the asteroid. The greatest momentum change will be achieved if the impact throws up ejecta that achieve escape velocity. If instead the Impactor just buries itself within the asteroid, not that much will be achieved, since its mass will be substantially less than any mass-extinction-inducing asteroid. For example, the object that created the Chicxulub crater and wiped out the dinosaurs (yes, alright except for the birds) is thought to have been in the order of 10 kilometres in diameter.
So before the impact, to assist future targeting and required impact velocity calculations, the Orbiter will make a detailed analysis of the target asteroids overall mass and its near-surface density and granularity. Then, after the impact, the Orbiter will assess the speed and distribution of the collision ejecta via its Impact Camera.
However, accurately measuring the degree of deflection achieved by the impact represents a substantial challenge for the mission. We will need much better data about the target asteroids mass and velocity than we can establish from Earth. So, the Orbiter will do a series of fly-bys and then go into orbit around the asteroid to assess how much the asteroid is affected by the spacecrafts proximity.
A precise determination of the Orbiters distance from the asteroid will be achieved by its Laser Altimeter, while a Radio Science Experiment will precisely determine the Orbiters position (and hence the asteroids position) relative to the Earth.
Having then established the Orbiter as a reference point, the effect of the collision of the Impactor will be assessed. However, a significant confounding factor is the Yarkovsky effect the effect of solar heating of the asteroid, which induces the emission of thermal photons and hence generates a tiny amount of thrust. The Yarkovsky effect naturally pushes an asteroids orbit outwards if it has a prograde spin (in the direction of its orbit) or inwards if it has retrograde spin. Hence, the Orbiter will also need a Thermal Infrared Spectrometer to separate the Yarkovsky effect from the effect of the impact.
To estimate the effect of Hidalgo's collision, the Yarkovsky effect must be acounted for. Heating of an asteroid's surface by the Sun causes thermal radiation. The nett cumulative momentum of that radiation is from surfaces that have just turned out of the Sun's light (i.e. 'dusk'). In asteroids with prograde spin, this will push the asteroid into a higher orbit - i.e. further away from the Sun. But, for asteroids with retrograde rotation, the orbit decays - i.e. towards the Sun.
And of course, given the importance of the Orbiter as a reference point, the effect of solar radiation on it must also be measured. Indeed, we will also need to factor in that this effect will change as the shiny new spacecrafts highly-reflective surfaces lose their sheen. Highly reflective surfaces will emit radiation, almost immediately, at energy levels (i.e. high momentum) almost equivalent to the incident radiation. However, low albedo surfaces may only release lower energy (i.e. lower momentum) thermal radiation and will do so more slowly.To put it another way, a mirror surface makes a much better solar sail than a black surface.
So in a nutshell, the Don Quijote impact mitigation mission will require an Impactor with a Targeting Camera and an Orbiter with an Impact Observation Camera, a Laser Altimeter, a Radio Science Experiment and a Thermal Infrared Spectrometer and you should remember to measure the effect of solar radiation pressure on the spacecraft early in the mission, when its shiny and later on, when its not.
More information: Wolters et al., Measurement requirements for a near-Earth asteroid impact mitigation demonstration mission.
Source: Universe Today
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
35
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...

Aug 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 15, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Aug 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Directing an asteroid of significant mass so it is CLOSER to earth probably wouldn't be hugely popular. It actually sounds like the plot of a great 'technology goes mad' thriller where the asteroid that was supposed to save us plunges into the Pacific and drowns half the earths population.
Can you say.... 'Ooops?'
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
With any degree of confidence of safety? None. That will take sometime before we have the propulsion capabilities to CORRECT a slip up or malfunction, because no doubt those will happen, but until that time, None none none and we'd be dumb to try.
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
We aren't capable of doing that - and probably won't be able to do so for quite some decades (or even centuries).
We have neither the technology nor the resources to move a multi kilo (or mega)tonne object anywhere in space. Our probes are a few kg to half a tonne at best - and a large proportion of that is fuel to get the tiny rest with the scientific experiments anywhere.
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
We could probably get a couple of these asteroids tethered, or something. Set them spinning and send them off, sling-like to smack an incoming object. If they got dangerous themselves we could detach them at a time that sends them both careening away from us. You could probably set several of these up with the spin properly aligned such that you could intercept any likely trajectories and have the safety release with no danger of impacting the planet.
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
My recommendation would be to attach a solar sail to the asteroid and let the sun alter the trajectory so it's less a threat.
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The idea is to hit it far away, so that something as miniscule as 500kg will have an effect. The closer you get the more you need to affect the incoming rock. But far enough out a few percent of a degree are enough to ensure a clean miss.
So if anything we want to hit asteroids anywhere BUT in Earth orbit.
Aug 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
POLL: Should the ESA go through with plans to fire a projectile at the asteroid 99942 Apophis to see if they can change its course?
Vote: wepolls.com/p/1805342
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet