Physicists seek to quantify macroscopic quantum states
June 29, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
(PhysOrg.com) -- "Scientists have been interested in generating and observing macroscopic quantum superpositions in order to test quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale," physicist Hyunseok Jeong of Seoul National University in Seoul, South Korea, told PhysOrg.com. "There have been many papers in which the authors claim to have generated mesoscopic or macroscopic superpositions, often called 'Schrodinger cat states.' However, quoting A. J. Leggett in 2002, a question from the theoretical side is What is the correct measure of "Schrodinger's-cattiness"?' It has been considered difficult to answer this question with a general measure, and the answer has remained to be 'very much a matter of personal taste,' quoting Leggett again. Our work now provides scientists with a theoretical tool to quantify and compare different types of quantum superpositions. This can be a step toward rigorous tests of quantum mechanics in a macroscopic limit."
Jeong and his coauthor Chang-Woo Lee, also of Seoul National University, have published their study on the quantification of macroscopic quantum superpositions in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters. Having a way to quantitatively compare different types of states in terms of their size and their degree of quantum coherence will be very useful for theoretical and experimental studies on macroscopic quantum phenomena, generation of nonclassical states, and the decoherence of quantum states within various physical systems.
As the scientists wrote in their study, quantum superposition is often considered the most crucial feature of quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, particles can exist in one or more energy levels. When a particle exists in just one energy level, its in a well-defined energy state. But when a particle exists in two or more different energy levels at once, its in a superposition of energy states. The most well-known example of superposition is Schrödingers cat, which is locked in a box with the possibility of being poisoned. Until an observer looks inside the box, the cat is considered to be both dead and alive at the same time, according to quantum mechanics.
Physicists have observed superposition in many experiments with microscopic systems. However, the question of whether a truly macroscopic system such as a cat can exist in a quantum superposition is much more complicated.
For the past 10 years or so, physicists have been proposing various ways to define or measure macroscopic quantum superpositions. Many of these proposals start by considering the number of particles or the distance between component states involved in the superposition. Although this approach sounds reasonable, the proposals have run into problems particularly, they have not been general enough to be applied to different types of states.
The biggest advantage of Lee and Jeongs method of measuring macroscopic quantum superpositions is its generality, which enables it to be applied to many different types of states and allows for direct comparison between them. The method is based on the quantum interference of a given state in phase space, which is the space in which all possible states of a system are represented.
As the scientists explained, a macroscopic quantum superposition has two (or more) well-separated peaks and some oscillating patterns between them in phase space. The scientists showed that the frequency of these interference fringes reflects the size of the superposition, while the magnitude of the interference fringes relates to the degree of genuine superposition. So using this method, the scientists could simultaneously quantify both the size of the system and its degree of quantum coherence. The method also works for superpositions that are fully or partially decoherent, which occurs when macroscopic superpositions lose quantum coherence due to interactions with their environments.
Overall, the method doesnt provide a specific threshold beyond which a superposition is macroscopic, but instead it provides a continuous scale to compare sizes of different superpositions. The scientists found that the method also agrees with a previous method (Dür, et al.) designed to measure a specific type of state. But with its advantage of being able to measure any state represented in phase space, the new method could be widely useful for future studies on macroscopic quantum systems.
In [this] paper, the focus was pretty much on continuous-variable states, which mainly relates to light fields, Jeong said. However, due to the intrinsic generality of our measure, it should be quite straightforward to extend it to various discrete-variable systems such as atomic states. I will then apply this measure (I would call it superness, thanks to Dr. Jonas Neergaard-Nielsen) to various claimed macroscopic superpositions. I believe that such investigations will reveal where we are regarding macroscopic tests of quantum theory.
More information: Chang-Woo Lee and Hyunseok Jeong. Quantification of Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions within Phase Space. Physical Review Letters 106, 220401 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.220401
Copyright 2011 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Question about high electric charge.
1 hour ago
-
eyeglasses with smallest chromatic abberation
4 hours ago
-
Linear momentum converted to angular momentum?!
4 hours ago
-
Physics laboratory project - bumpers/crash tests
5 hours ago
-
How to open a winebottle with a shoe
5 hours ago
-
magnetic field from stream of protons
15 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
What if we could choose the desired state from the "superness"? (Stephenson's Anathem)
Superness indeed!
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
...
Jul 01, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"So using this method, PYLE could simultaneously quantify both the size of the system and its degree of quantum coherence. The COMMENTARY THREAD also works for superpositions that are fully or partially decoherent, which occurs when macroscopic superpositions lose quantum coherence due to interactions with PYLE." - authors ( slightly edited.)
lol
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sorry. Busy. ;) I had this on an open tab since day one and just now got to it. This IS huge. I love this f-ing site!
Google Chrome says teleportation isn't a word. It doesn't want us to talk about it. Beware the googlebot! haha
I think I may be about to confuse superposition and entanglement:
This article makes me think about a much less ominous thing; quantum consciousness theory.
Could we be able to measure the overall level of coherence(entanglement?) of the left to the right hemispheres of our brains? Could we deduce a coherence(entanglement?) between something in the experiment to something that is far from the experiment? I'm thinking about Penrose's (I think) idea of a whole mind being entangled with another (superpositioned) mind, maybe even outside the visible Verse. Am I anywhere near relevant to this article? hahaha
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
© Copyright 2011 Thomas A. Sullivan
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That made less than zero sense. Super-imposed on other particles? That's something much more than entanglement and implies coherence over any/all particles. Where did you get that? You don't seem to have answered anything.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Wow, I made less than zero sense! I have created anti-sense, and it hasnt even annihilated any sense yet.
Yes, I realize that there was not enough information to fully understand my concepts. Rip Theory predicts that there is what you called a "coherence" over all particles. Rip Theory predicts that all particles are "entangled" to a certain degree by "gravity tubes". When the perimeter (edge) of one particle (rip) moves, that movement affects all other particles. The movements are "inversed" because when an edge of a particle (rip) moves, the other edges move in an opposite manner. (This is from a theory I wrote and registered with the Library of Congress. It is yet just a theory, but a Swiss team has done an experiment that seems to confirm the basis of this theory.)
© Copyright 2011 Thomas A. Sullivan
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I missed you earlier comment somehow. TS's ?theory? got in the way I guess.
I'm still disappointed in the lack of response to this article. I guess it flew under the radar.
Neal Stephenson's Anathem meanders around this theme, sort of. Not as funny or cool as Snow Crash or as scary as Diamond Age, but the physics behind it is quite clever.
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet