NASA chief tech says 'decade' for shuttle replacement
February 26, 2011 by Kerry Sheridan
Once the US space shuttle program closes, it will be about a decade before America can make a new vehicle for sending astronauts to space, NASA's chief technologist predicts.
When the longtime centerpiece of US spaceflight shutters later this year, NASA will focus on experiments at the International Space Station (ISS) and on partnerships with private industry to build new spacecraft, Robert Braun told AFP in an interview this week.
But with spending squeezed and NASA at odds with lawmakers over a 2016 timeframe for building a new heavy-lift rocket and crew vehicle to replace the 30-year-old shuttle program, Braun said that developing the future mode of travel could take longer than Congress, or the US public, may want to hear.
"Let's call it -- think about it as a decade if you want to put a time stamp to it," said Braun, who gathered along with a host of veteran astronauts, politicians and space enthusiasts at Kennedy Space Center on Thursday to witness the final blastoff for the Discovery space shuttle.
"In that decade not only will we fully utilize the International Space Station but we will develop the capabilities to send humans up and down through the commercial crew program and to send humans beyond low Earth orbit with the space launch system and the multipurpose crew vehicle," he said.
"What specific year in that decade I think does depend a lot on budgets but I am pretty comfortable with it in that timeframe."
NASA told Congress in January that it could not afford to build a new heavy lift rocket and space capsule within the five-year timeframe and budget outlined in the fiscal year 2011 and President Barack Obama's 2012 budget request.
"None of the design options studied thus far appeared to be affordable in our present fiscal conditions, based upon existing cost models, historical data, and traditional acquisition approaches," said a NASA report to lawmakers.
A second NASA progress report is due in April, with the shuttle Endeavour scheduled for its crowning journey to the ISS on April 19, followed by Atlantis June 28.
After that, Russia's Soyuz space capsule will provide the sole method of transport for astronauts to and from the orbiting ISS. The US shuttles typically tote six or seven astronauts at a time; Soyuz tops out at three.
While critics raise concerns about risks tied to the more limited travel options, Braun said there are plenty of benefits to go around.
"The Russians have proven themselves to be a vibrant partner in the ISS to date," said Braun.
"I would say that the Russians are dependent upon the United States for operations of the International Space Station, we will for some time be dependent on them," he said.
"I think that is the nature of a partnership. All partnerships I have ever been involved in, both parties gain something from that collaboration."
In the meantime, NASA will turn its efforts toward space experiments on the ISS -- everything from recycling drinkable water in space to finding ways to protect human space travelers from radiation and the ravages of microgravity.
"Think about what it might take to send humans off into deep space -- not only do they have to be protected from the radiation environment but they have to live sustainably in space for long periods of time," said Braun.
Another key focus of NASA and its international partners is sending a roving robot explorer to Mars, with the launch of the Mars Science Laboratory set for later this year and a landing in 2012, he said.
Braun said the US space program is far from finished.
"My job is to basically think about NASA's future and I spend almost all my time doing so and I can tell you that NASA's future is very strong," he said.
"NASA is bigger than the space shuttle. Human space flight is bigger than the space shuttle," said Braun.
"If you think about it as a book, we are going from one chapter to another chapter. In this new chapter, the International Space Station goes from something that is being constructed to something that is being fully utilized by the international community," he said.
"What we are really talking about is a transition of the human spaceflight program, certainly not an end."
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
31 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
14 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (19) |
0
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
14 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
14 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
14 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Welcome to the third world.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
They should spend some money on researching technologies for space elevator, if only we can construct it, we will see hundreds of times more missions and all kinds of launches. If we build more than one space elevator, lets say 6 ( USA, UE, China, Japan, Russia, India) then it will come crazy times for space exploration. I hope that we will see first elevator in 2030
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I am sure ULA would be glad to do it on time for those countless billions, if NASA is not up to the task. But I guess milking the federal budget is more important than affordable and efficient space program..
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
If it would be up to me, I would invest much more money into space exploration, it is one of the best use of tax money, IMHO. But my point was that there is more effective way to do it (and thus achieve more for the same limited budget), not to spend less.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
My, how the mighty have fallen.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Cargo will be delivered to orbit by 2 US commercial firms (SpaceX & Orbital Sciences) starting in the next 12 months. By 2014-2015, two or more firms will start delivering crews to orbit. This will cost far less than they shuttle. The average cost per flight of a Shuttle is over $1B.
Braun is referring just to a heavy launch vehicle + the Orion capsule, which some argue are needed for deep space missions. Both of these systems are developed in-house at NASA with commercial subcontractors. Such in-house projects are extremely expensive and time-consuming. With expected budget constraints, NASA will be lucky to have them flying by 2020.
A far more cost-effective approach to deep-space missions would be to develop in-space systems, such as fuel depots and reusable in-space transports, that would work with the above commercial launchers.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Don't know if you've been keeping up with current events, but the *world* is broke, mate.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
.
.
stop people that still want to play with capsules, ET and SRBs just to lose TEN MORE YEARS and at least $20-30 billions!!!
.
why don't give me $1 billion to start my new.space company?
.
my plan:
.
back to orbit with an US vehicle within 5-6 years
.
a lunar orbit space station within 8 years
.
back to the Moon surface within the 50th of the Apollo 11
.
a lunar outpost within 2020
.
the robotic exploration of great part of the Moon within 2025
.
a manned orbital Mars base on Phobos within 2025
.
the robotic exploration of great part of Mars within 2030
.
the first manned Mars landing within 2030
.
the colonization of Mars to start from 2035
.
.
.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Big government wastes money like no other institution can. And when their failed designs and inefficient processes comes to fruition, are they eliminated? Nope. They pass special bills that let them fly anyways.
Government should be a watchdog and regulator. Just like now how they are requiring companies like SpaceX to implement safety systems that they themselves took out of the shuttle to save money.
SpaceX will provide space access cheaper, safer, and more reliably than NASA ever could, and soon I suspect Bigelow will be able to provide more habitat room in orbit for fractions less than the ISS.
Go private sector.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
With everyone out of money and no means to build a new space station, in ten years there may be no space station to go too...
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Bigelow just happened to get lucky, buying billions of dollars worth of NASA research for almost nothing (NASA's managers were hoping to convince someone else to take over their research because they knew it was better than the crap they were being forced to use).
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
How many shuttles do you have? How many footprints on the Moon? Aircraft carriers? We're broke, you're broke, everyone except China is broke. The difference is we have something to show for it. We spent money and built things. And if you relish in the mighty falling, we were just following in the steps of our brethren. Tell me, does the sun in fact set on your empire now?
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Yea, that is an example of the government environment and why it should not be in "business" like ventures. Sure early on when space was more of a military thing they were able to make some great accomplishments, but now that NASA is more government and less military, it is getting really bad.
How ever COTS got started, it was a brilliant idea to save some of the brilliant IP and experience of NASA and pass it on before it is lost.
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Another reason why space travel is going to really take off only when corporations and commercial interests are involved.
Instead of funding legions of overpaid govt. workers hamstrung by ridiculous political shenanigans and laws , space travel companies should work like Airline companies - perform or perish.
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
So how come the voters keep this system of nepotical idiocracy going?
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Feb 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Well, there are a lot of things that would not survive ballistic acceleration into orbit. Most electronics or structured materials won't survive. But it might work very well for consumables (food, oxygen, fuel, etc.). And in a pinch it could be re-purposed as a super artillery weapon to land warheads or kinetic shells onto enemy targets. It would be a two for the price of one!
Feb 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
THe only thing that probably wouldn't survive acceleration on that order is a human being. Our electronics would have a tough time with the magnetic field generated by the delivery system but that can be shielded at a very low weight to cost ratio.