Why being big like an elephant puts a spring in your step

Sep 07, 2009
elephant
African Bush Elephant in Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Taken by Oliver Wright, via Wikipedia.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large, lumbering animals such as elephants move much more efficiently than small, agile ones such as mice, University of Manchester scientists have shown.

Large, lumbering animals such as elephants move much more efficiently than small, agile ones such as , University of Manchester scientists have shown.

Dr Robert Nudds and colleagues Drs Jonathan Codd and Bill Sellers at the Faculty of Life Sciences have found that bigger animals move three and a half times more efficiently than smaller ones.

"The difference is down to having a more upright ," says Dr Nudds.

"We believe the tendons in the legs of larger animals have better elastic storage than those in smaller ones. Tendons act as a spring. In larger animals such as an elephant, the tendons may be springier returning more energy into the next step, by pinging the leg off the floor.

"In addition efficiency doesn't increase continuously with body size. There is a step change between large animals such as elephants and small animals such as mice. This is down to their posture - are 'uprights', while mice are 'crouchers'.

"Standing up straight does have an impact."

He and the team, whose results are published in today (Monday 7th September), analysed existing data to contribute to a larger study on . They compared efficiency values (the amount of movement achieved compared to consumed) across a range of body sizes. Instead of finding a steady increase in efficiency as animals got larger, they found a step-change, whereby all small animals are 7% efficient and all larger animals 26% efficient.

Humans, which are also upright walkers, also have an efficiency rating of around 26%.

While it was known that large animals moved more efficiently than smaller ones, the step change and the impact of posture was a revelation.

"The big difference is that posture rather than body size determines the efficiency of locomotion," says Dr Nudds, whose study was funded by the Leverhulme Trust. "So your mother was right when she told you to stand up straight and stop slouching!"

More information: 'Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion'; Robert L. Nudds, Jonathan R. Codd and William I. Sellers; PLoS ONE.

Provided by University of Manchester (news : web)

Explore further: Researchers show how our sense of smell evolved, including in cave men

Related Stories

Have you ever seen an elephant... run?

Aug 18, 2006

If an elephant is thundering towards you at 15mph you are probably not too concerned with the finer points of biomechanics or the thorny question about whether they are truly running or not. But for researchers, ...

Dogs chase efficiently, but cats skulk counterintuitively

Dec 03, 2008

A Duke University study suggests that evolution can behave as differently as dogs and cats. While the dogs depend on an energy-efficient style of four-footed running over long distances to catch their prey, cats seem to have ...

Why are lions not as big as elephants?

Jan 16, 2007

Carnivores are some of the widest ranging terrestrial mammals for their size, and this affects their energy intake and needs. This difference is also played out in the different hunting strategies of small and large carnivores. ...

Recommended for you

Researchers discover new mechanism of DNA repair

Jul 03, 2015

The DNA molecule is chemically unstable giving rise to DNA lesions of different nature. That is why DNA damage detection, signaling and repair, collectively known as the DNA damage response, are needed.

The math of shark skin

Jul 03, 2015

"Sharks are almost perfectly evolved animals. We can learn a lot from studying them," says Emory mathematician Alessandro Veneziani.

Cuban, US scientists bond over big sharks

Jul 03, 2015

Somewhere in the North Atlantic right now, a longfin mako shark—a cousin of the storied great white—is cruising around, oblivious to the yellow satellite tag on its dorsal fin.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

zevkirsh
not rated yet Sep 07, 2009
this is dumb. animals are not cars.
acarrilho
not rated yet Sep 07, 2009
this is dumb. animals are not cars.


I must've missed the part where this comparison was made... but such an analogy, as far as energy efficiency goes, would be perfectly valid.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.