Foreign election interference focuses on cultivating distrust, reducing consensus
Foreign interference in U.S. elections likely focuses, in part, on creating distrust among Americans, with paralyzing the American political process as its main goal, according to a new RAND Corporation report.
Recent efforts by Russia to meddle in U.S. elections are based largely on strategies developed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and partly aim to elicit strong reactions and drive people to extreme positions to lower the odds they will reach a consensus—a bedrock of American democracy.
New technologies such as the rise of social media have made Russia's information efforts easier to implement than the propaganda campaigns of the Soviet era, presenting policymakers with challenges to develop practices to counter the meddling, according to the study.
"While foreign influence in U.S. domestic affairs dates back to the founding of this country, Russia has advanced its tactics into a comprehensive foreign policy tool that seeks to undermine democratic governance processes in the United States," said Marek N. Posard, the study's lead author and a sociologist at RAND, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research group.
Researchers recommend that strategies for responding to foreign information efforts be broad rather than narrow, and that those strategies anticipate which subgroups of Americans are likely targets of information efforts by foreign adversaries.
Additionally, there is a need to develop evidence-based preventative interventions for those who are most likely targets within U.S. society.
The RAND study documents how foreign influence in U.S. domestic affairs dates back to the founding of this country, with both Alexander Hamilton and George Washington warning about the dangers of foreign influence in U.S. governing.
While many countries have sought to use active measures against the U.S., the Soviet Union and then Russia institutionalized them over many decades and advanced them into a comprehensive foreign policy tool. The strategy is used to undermine democratic governance processes in the United States and its allies, with the overarching aim to weaken the United States and its allies, while advancing Russia as a global power.
The techniques the Soviets developed during the Cold War have been augmented today with internet-based media, social networking sites, trolls and bots, according to the report. Technological development has opened new means of manipulation via information and facilitates more scalable, bigger and more-impactful operations with minimal expense.
RAND researchers say that some of Russia's actions aim to exacerbate divisive issues like racial inequities or immigration. Others target public confidence in democratic institutions and processes to undermine social trust.
Reports indicate that Russian-backed attempts to create discord in the U.S. have made use of existing movements across the American political ideological spectrum and worked to create new ones. Reports show that online Russian trolls have targeted both white supremacists and civil rights activists.
"Successful information efforts try to sow deep divisions between groups of people to generate a perception of 'us' versus 'them' that that will trigger strong reactions in people," Posard said. "The ultimate goal is to reduce the probability that groups of people may find common ground on issues of public concern."
Any defensive strategy should account for the complex relationship between the production of falsehoods, how others distribute content online and the impacts of the content on consumers.
RAND researchers say an antidote to manufacturing intergroup conflict is convincing people that they have more in common with those who are different from them than they may believe at first glance. The RAND report recommends collecting, analyzing and evaluating preventative interventions to protect people from reacting to falsehoods meant to divide the U.S.
The research was sponsored by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services. The report is the first in a four-part series aimed at helping policymakers and the public understand the threat of online foreign interference in national, state and local elections, and how to mitigate it.