De-moo-cracy: Swiss farmer's quest to save cow horns goes to vote

November 21, 2018 by Eloi Rouyer
Swiss livestock farmer Armin Capaul—inspired by conversations with his cattle—has managed to force a national vote on cow dehorning

Concern over the cruelty of removing a cow's horns had not been one of Switzerland's most pressing political issues.

So when livestock Armin Capaul—inspired by conversations with his cattle—managed to force a national vote on the question following an upstart campaign that began with few resources and no political support, he became a media celebrity.

But Capaul, whose wild grey hair and unkept beard accurately identify him as a man of the mountains, insisted that his insurgent bid to limit dehorning in Switzerland is not about him.

"It's the cow that's important, not me," the farmer, in his 70s, told AFP at his home in Perrefitte, a municipality in the heart of the Jura mountain range.

Capaul credits his cows with giving him the idea to push for Sunday's referendum.

"I always talk to my cows in the barn. They asked me if I could do something for them, if I could help them keep their horns," he said.

"One way or the other, something had to be done and if the animal welfare organisations weren't going to do anything, then I would do it," he said.

'They laughed at me'

The proposal on Sunday's ballot does not call for a ban on dehorning. Instead, it seeks a constitutional amendment that would create incentives for farmers to let horns grow.

The poll is part of Switzerland's famous direct democracy system, but in many ways it stands apart from other initiatives put to a vote in a recent years.

Often a proposal has the backing of established political parties, which use their networks to secure the 100,000 signatures needed to force a vote. The parties then typically set up lobby groups to campaign for their policies.

Switzerland has used the image of the horned cow to promote everything from its chocolate to its mountainous landscape

This was not Capaul's method.

In 2010, he wrote a letter to the federal agriculture office asking it to make preservation part of its animal welfare strategy.

"They laughed at me," Capaul said.

He then petitioned Swiss lawmakers in both the upper and lower house.

When that strategy failed, he launched a popular initiative, securing 119,626 signatures within the 18-month deadline in a campaign that ultimately attracted support from environmental and animal rights groups.

"If my wife had known what this would cause, she would not have supported me," he joked, in reference to the intense Swiss media focus heaped on the previously anonymous farmer in recent weeks.

'National animal'

Beyond animal cruelty, debate over the initiative has touched on the realities of the livestock business.

Some argue that dehorning cows is crucial because it allows farmers to house more in close proximity with less risk of injury.

Capaul and some of his backers counter that preserving horns is the right thing to do both for animals and for Switzerland—the country has used the image of the horned cow to promote everything from its chocolate to its mountainous landscape.

"The horns are part of the cow... there is a lot of blood inside, more than in the tail of a dog, which it is forbidden to cut," he said.

In Switzerland's famous direct democracy system, a proposal usually has the backing of established political parties, which use their networks to secure the 100,000 signatures needed to force a vote
"In Switzerland, there are still 10 percent of cows that still have horns and these are the ones that I want to save," he added.

"The cow is, in a sense, the national animal. Its (image is) everywhere."

Pointed issue

The Federal Council, Switzerland's executive branch, is opposed to granting subsidies for horn preservation.

"There is no study that says or goats without horns are disproportionately harmed," it said in a statement.

It argued that farmers must remain free to dehorn their livestock for "entrepreneurial" reasons, if they so choose.

The Swiss Farmers' Union, the country's main agricultural organisation, has stayed neutral.

Polling conducted this month suggests the result is too close to call.

A survey by the Tamedia company had 52 percent of respondents against, versus 45 percent in support. The GFS Bern polling and research firm has 49 percent voting yes, and 46 percent voting no.

For a popular initiative to pass, it needs the backing of both a majority of voters and support in more than half of Switzerland's 26 cantons.

Explore further: Farm animals may soon get new features through gene editing

Related Stories

Evaluation of fitness for transport of cull cows varies

September 10, 2018

Assessment of whether a cull cow is fit for transport to the slaughterhouse can vary according to who is doing the assessment. This was indicated in a study carried out by researchers from Aarhus University, in which they ...

Swiss vote to block foreign-based gambling sites

June 10, 2018

Swiss voters overwhelmingly approved Sunday blocking foreign-based betting sites in a high-stakes referendum on a new gambling law designed to prevent addiction, but which opponents said amounted to internet censorship.

Recommended for you

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.