Can crunch talks bring the Paris climate treaty to life?

September 2, 2018
As the pace of global warming races ahead of efforts to tame it, diplomats from more than 190 nations begin crunch UN climate talks in Bangkok Tuesday to breathe life into the Paris Agreement.

As the pace of global warming races ahead of efforts to tame it, diplomats from more than 190 nations begin crunch UN climate talks in Bangkok Tuesday to breathe life into the Paris Agreement.

This year is the deadline to finalise the "rule book" for the 2015 treaty, which calls for capping the rise in at "well below" two degrees Celsius, and 1.5 C if possible.

The pact also promises $100 billion annually from 2020 to poor nations already coping with floods, heatwaves, rising seas and superstorms made worse by .

"The Paris Agreement was like a letter of intent," said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University.

Unless detailed rules of implementation covering dozens of contentious and unresolved issues are agreed upon, he and other experts said, the landmark treaty could run aground.

Lamenting "uneven progress" to date, co-chairs of UN talks last month urged rank-and-file negotiators to produce "clear and streamlined options" that ministers and heads of state can push across the finish line at the December UN in Poland.

"If Parties do not achieve this in Bangkok, a satisfactory outcome in Katowice will be in jeopardy," they wrote in the unusual appeal.

The most persistent sticking points in the UN talks revolve around money.

Developing countries favour outright grants from public sources, demand visibility on how donor nations intend to scale up this largesse, and object to under-investment in adapting to climate impacts.

Rich countries want more private capital in the mix, prefer projects with profit potential, and have been reluctant to make hard-and-fast long-term commitments.

This tension flared spectacularly in July when the UN's flagship climate finance initiative, the Green Climate Fund, suffered a boardroom meltdown after members could not agree on funding priorities.

Symptom and cause

The executive director quit, and the paralysed fund—hampered by US President Donald Trump's refusal to honour a US $2 billion pledge—is facing a cash crunch.

The Fund's woes are both symptom and cause, and will complicate the broader talks on finance, experts say.

An even more daunting—and arguably urgent—task facing diplomats in Bangkok and Katowice is ratcheting up voluntary national commitments to cut planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions.

Taken together, current pledges would allow average global temperatures to climb more than 3 C (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels. The mercury has gone up 1 C so far.

Under the Paris accord, countries are not required to revisit these commitments until 2023.

But waiting that long could doom the planet to runaway , scientists warn in a UN special report obtained by AFP, to be officially unveiled in October.

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1.5 C report will show the need for increased ambition if we want to have a functional human civilisation in the future," said Wael Hmaidan, executive director of Climate Action Network, which groups hundreds of climate NGOs.

Debilitating heatwaves and deadly fires across the northern hemisphere this summer may be a mild foretaste of what a climate addled future would look like.

"We need to see announcements of increased ambition from some of the big countries that put out 2030 commitments—China, India, Brazil, the European Union, Japan," said Alden Meyer, policy and strategy director for the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington.

Bottleneck is governments

A handful of nations, including the United States, submitted plans running out to 2025.

Meanwhile, dozens of developing countries in the Climate Vulnerable Forum, an informal bloc, are announcing ambitious timetables for energy sectors run entirely with renewables.

"They are saying, 'if we—the poorest, most climate impacted countries in the world—are able to be in line with the 1.5 C goal, there is no excuse for bigger, richer countries not to do the same'," said Hmaidan.

Sub-national governments, regions, cities and businesses gathering in San Francisco in mid-September at the Global Climate Action Summit are also poised to unveil initiatives and commitments to speed the transition to a low- or no-carbon global economy.

But the full-throttle response needed tackle global warming has yet to materialise, as each sector looks to the other to take the lead.

"Businesses are looking to countries to build on the commitments they made in Paris," said Jennifer Austin, policy director for We Mean Business.

"Strong, clear policies are what give businesses clarity and confidence."

At the same time, even nations instrumental in forging the Paris pact have failed to redouble their efforts, said Hmaidan.

"The bottleneck for a real transformation is political will at the national level—heads of state," he said.

France's environment minister Nicolas Hulot quit his post suddenly last week, citing among other reasons lack of progress on change.

Explore further: With deadline looming, UN climate talks fall short

Related Stories

With deadline looming, UN climate talks fall short

May 10, 2018

UN talks ending Thursday failed to hammer out a draft of the "operating manual" that would bring the landmark Paris climate treaty to life, forcing governments to add an emergency negotiating session ahead of a December climate ...

Developing world says rich nations shirking on climate

November 10, 2017

The failure of wealthy nations to deliver on short-term climate commitments could hinder the rollout of a landmark treaty, a bloc of 134 developing countries, including India and China, warned Thursday at UN negotiations ...

What is the Paris Agreement?

November 17, 2017

On December 12, 2015, 195 countries gathered in the French capital to conclude the first truly universal climate treaty, the Paris Agreement, aimed at preventing worst-case-scenario global warming.

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 03, 2018
1.5 degrees in this political environment?
Tell them he's dreaming.
not rated yet Sep 04, 2018
The 2015 treaty does not call "for capping the rise in global temperatures at "well below two degrees Celsius". In reality, Article 2.1 merely "aims" to hold temperature below 2ºC – an aim that's most unlikely to succeed as the treaty exempts developing countries (responsible for 65% of CO2 emissions) from any obligation, legal, moral or political, to reduce their emissions: see Article 4.4, reinforcing Article 4.7 of the umbrella 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2018
1.5 degrees in this political environment?
Tell them he's dreaming.

The leetennant JACKASS brays, yet again.
This is the Chicken Little jackass, who boasted about his, CO2 spewing, jaunt to Antarctica and his plans to do the same to the Arctic. With jackasses like this, pretending that they are saving the world, of course 1.5 degrees is a dream.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2018
But antigoracle, surely leetennant is right? "This political environment", as he puts it, includes China, India, S Korea and all the other newly industrialised economies that are intent to burning increased amounts of fossil fuels - to energise their growing economies. And there's not a lot he - or anyone in the West - can do about it. Time to wake up to global reality.

not rated yet Sep 04, 2018
The problem is the West actually. We created the problem and we refuse to fix it.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2018
Too late for us to fix it. As I've said, the developing countries - many of them big economies now - are responsible for 65% of global emissions (a percentage that increases every year). And for the entire increase in emissions since 1992 (the date of the Rio Earth Summit). Yet they - again as I've said - are exempt from taking action. That's something they've insisted on in climate negotiations. Oh and you've got to add Japan and Russia who - for quite different reasons - are not interested in cutting their emissions either. So the West, responsible for less than 25% of emissions, cannot fix the problem. Understand now?
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2018
The problem is the West actually. We created the problem and we refuse to fix it.

The leetennant; Chicken Little jackass brays, yet again.
This is the jackass how boasts about his, CO2 spewing, pleasure cruise to Antarctica and his plans to repeat the same to the Arctic. NOW THAT'S HOW THIS JACKASS FIXES THE PROBLEM.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.