If the script for "Avengers: Infinity War" was peer-reviewed

May 11, 2018 by Sara Kassabian, Public Library of Science

Warning: this article contains spoilers for Avengers: Infinity War.

What if movie scripts were subjected to the same peer-review process as a scientific manuscript? Peer-review for a involves a journal editor sending your manuscript to two or three expert reviewers for feedback. As most scientists are acutely aware, their work is often perceived differently through different lenses. Let it serve as a scicomm reminder that no matter how carefully you communicate your work, beauty is always in the eye of the beholder.

Reviewer #1

This ponderous script continues a never-ending storyline that has dragged on for many years now. Despite its girth, the script constitutes merely an incremental gain in terms of storytelling: you could say it goes "Knowhere." While there are dazzling special effects, there is nothing special about the story. Frustratingly, the conclusion leaves the audience with more questions than answers, a transparent ploy to help raise additional funds to support yet another script. Additional concerns are listed below that need to be addressed to make this acceptable for publication.

Major comments

  1. Thanos does not appear to be aware that the Malthusian Theory of Population has been debunked (it does not take into account how advances in technology offset expansions in population). Thus, his justification to vanquish fifty percent of life from the Universe is deeply flawed.
  2. If the Infinity Stones grant the power to eliminate life with the snap of the fingers, why didn't Thanos use this power to expand the available resources in the Universe to accommodate the growing population?
  3. The disappearance of matter without the creation of energy is not consistent with the laws of thermodynamics.
  4. There is no algorithm presented in the Methods that describes the selection process for who gets to live or die. To make this a random process is not only intellectually lazy, but it also contradicts Thanos's claim that his motivations are benevolent. What about worlds or ecosystems that have already achieved the balance he hopes to create; would these still be subject to his plan? Is it merciful to extinguish members of endangered species? What if random chance eliminates Bob Dylans and leaves us with Justin Biebers?
  5. I find it unbelievable that the Hulk can "choose" to refrain from appearing when Bruce Banner gets angry. The Hulk is not a separate entity dwelling within Banner, but rather a stress response that arises due to Banner's mutated DNA. Anger should incontrovertibly trigger the Hulk stress response.
  6. Given her knowledge of the location of the Soul Stone, it is illogical for Gamora to risk going to Knowhere rather than to Nidavellir.
  7. The Avengers had multiple opportunities to kill Thanos, and it is disquieting to watch them make so many stupid mistakes. First, just as his superhero colleagues were about to pull the Infinity Gauntlet off Thanos's hand, Star-Lord arrives and sabotages their effort because he couldn't control his temper. Second, if it is so hard to pull the Infinity Gauntlet off Thanos's hand, then why didn't the Avengers just cut off his arm? And why indeed didn't Thor aim for Thanos's head instead of his chest when attacking him with his new axe?

Minor comments

  1. The introduction needs significant revision. The authors just throw us right into the story without any context; they should not assume everyone has seen all of the previous films leading up to this one.
  2. The authors seem to have completely forgotten that Hawkeye and Valkyrie exist.
  3. The authors should do to this script what Thanos proposed to do to life in the Universe: reduce it by fifty percent. For example, the drawn-out visit to the Dwarf King Eitri to make Thor's axe should be (ahem) cut.
  4. Was that Tobias Fünke from Arrested Development in the background when the Guardians of the Galaxy visit the Collector?
  5. The origin of the Infinity Gauntlet and how Thanos came to acquire it is unclear and contradicts earlier accounts in previously published scripts.

Reviewer #2

It is not easy to draft a script that pulls from dozens of others written over many years, but the authors have done an admirable job. The script is packed with exciting scenes that lead to a climax that, like any good script, leaves us with more questions than answers. It is hard to describe the thrill of seeing all these characters band together to fight the greatest threat the Universe has ever seen. It is also refreshing to learn that even superheroes make mistakes sometimes. The tale is long, but acceptable; the time flies because we're having so much fun.

I do, however, have to take issue with the comment regarding the 1984 film, Footloose. It is indeed the greatest movie in history. Other than that, I recommend publication.

Reviewer #3

It took me nine weeks to finally submit my critique, but I am against the publication of this script. I feel that the end results are highly misleading, and I won't be surprised if some (or all) of them are retracted in a couple years.

Explore further: Researchers to study link between gastric bypass and alcohol abuse

Related Stories

Using Hawkeye from the Avengers to communicate on the eye

January 19, 2018

Pop culture figures like Iron Man, Captain America and Hawkeye can provide a unique and engaging platform for the communication of difficult scientific concepts. In the classroom, these characters can be used to communicate ...

Recommended for you

Searching for new bridge forms that can span further

September 19, 2018

Newly identified bridge forms could enable significantly longer bridge spans to be achieved in the future, potentially making a crossing over the Strait of Gibraltar, from the Iberian Peninsula to Morocco, feasible.

Fossils reveal diverse Mesozoic pollinating lacewings

September 17, 2018

Insect pollination played an important role in the evolution of angiosperms. Little is known, however, about ancient pollination insects and their niche diversity during the pre-angiosperm period due to the rarity of fossil ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TheGhostofOtto1923
not rated yet May 12, 2018
"Malthusian Theory of Population has been debunked (advances in tech offset expansions in pops)..."

-NO it most definitely HAS NOT. I get sick reading this crap from so-called experts.

The only reason growth has declined, and ONLY in western nations, is because of the ONE BILLION ABORTIONS that have taken place since roe v wade in 1973.

In addition, family planning, the emancipation of women, and the enforcement if laws designating adolescents as children, have prevented a billion and more. Including their offspring to 2 or 3 gens.

Elsewhere, in religion-dominated countries, malthus roars along with war, starvation, suffering, misery, driving waves of refugees westward.

Please experts, add these figures to your theories and admit you have been misleading people for generations.

I suppose you could call RU486 a techno advancement if that makes you feel better but it's not about filling baby maker bellies and keeping them warm and dry now is it?
TheGhostofOtto1923
not rated yet May 12, 2018
The most important site on the internet
http://www.johnst....html#SU

1/3 to 1/2 of pregnancies ABORTED in some western countries. How can academies ignore these numbers with a straight face?
TheGhostofOtto1923
not rated yet May 12, 2018
Shifting gears-

Re the movie, i do hope they dont pull the 'go back in time and fix everything' maneuver in the next movie. 'Agents of Shield' is doing that right now and it is SO tired and worn out.

I think they just needed to kill off all the old actors so they can recast in future movies. How many spidermans have there been?

Thor is now a woman in the comics?? Maybe they want Rihanna next-
TheGhostofOtto1923
not rated yet May 12, 2018
The thing about Thanosian population control is that malthus rules throughout the universe, not him. He should have targeted species, not individuals. Niches take longer to refill than populations.

But either way, in the history of the universe he would be just a blip.
Jonseer
5 / 5 (1) May 12, 2018
So Phys.org has a sense of humor. ;-)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.