Researchers suggest ancient preserved circulatory and nervous systems in China are actually biofilms

April 11, 2018 by Bob Yirka, report
Fuxianhuia protensa from an ‘event bed’ (EB) and a ‘background bed’ (BGB) of the Chengjiang Fossil Lagersta¨tte, showing typical differences in preservation. (a) EB fossil (ELI-JS721) showing excellent preservation of the external anatomy (e.g. the head shield, trunk tergites, antennae and stalked eyes). (b) BGB fossil (ELI-JS327A) preserving only remains of the gut and very faint segmentation in the partly decayed cuticle. Scale bar equals 5 mm. Credit: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0051

A small team of researchers from Germany and China has found evidence that suggests ancient preserved circulatory and nervous systems found in Chengjiang, China, are actually the remains of biofilms. In their paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the group describes their study of hundreds of fossils collected from the Chengjiang site and what they found.

Approximately 10 years ago, researchers studying remains uncovered at the Chengjiang site started making claims that they had found samples of nervous systems and veins in some of the fossils they were studying—suggesting that such had somehow survived intact for approximately 520 million years. They further claimed that the material had survived due to the unique nature in which they had been preserved. The ancient creatures were covered with mud almost immediately after death, sealing them away from decaying elements. The researchers with this new effort disagree—the material resembling brains and soft body parts, they suggest, is much more likely to be biofilm remains.

The researchers came to this conclusion by studying over 800 fossils uncovered at the Chengjiang site. As part of their investigation, they looked at differences between the fossils, noting that they should look somewhat the same. Brains, they note, from two different fossils should look quite a bit alike, regardless of the preservation method—but they found a lot of variation. They noted also that some of the fossils with so-called soft remains had come from what are deemed event beds—where a creature was covered with mud almost immediately after death. But some also came from what are known as background beds, in which the creature was covered more slowly, and tellingly, a very unlikely scenario for long-term preservation. They also noted some examples in which the hard shell of an ancient creature had been lost, but its soft inner material had still been somehow preserved, a very difficult proposition to swallow.

The researchers then conducted some reenactments with modern creatures such as shrimp, noting how they decayed when covered with mud soon after . Even under such conditions, they note, the soft tissue was always the first thing to decay.

The researchers conclude by suggesting that the material thought to be brains or other parts, or veins, is instead more likely the remains of biofilms.

Explore further: Fossilized brains of ancient sea creatures found in northern Greenland

More information: Jianni Liu et al. Microbial decay analysis challenges interpretation of putative organ systems in Cambrian fuxianhuiids, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0051

The Chengjiang fossil Lagerstätte (Cambrian Stage 3) from Yunnan, southern China is renowned for its soft-tissue preservation. Accordingly structures in fuxianhuiids, radiodontans and great appendage arthropods have been interpreted as the nervous and cardiovascular systems, including brains, hearts and blood vessels. That such delicate organ systems survive the fossilization process seems remarkable; given that this mode of preservation involves major taphonomic changes, such as flattening, microbial degradation, chemical alteration and replacement. Here, we document a range of taphonomic preservation states in numerous articulated individuals of Fuxianhuia protensa. We suggest that organic (partly iron mineral-replaced) bulbous structures in the head region, previously interpreted as brain tissue, along with sagittally located organic strands interpreted as part of the cardiovascular system or as nerve cords, may be better explained as microbial biofilms that developed following decomposition of the intestine, muscle and other connective tissues, forming halos surrounding the original organic remains.

Related Stories

Fatty bird gland preserved over 48 million years

October 18, 2017

(—A team of researchers from the U.S., Ireland, Germany and the U.K. has found evidence of preservation of a fatty oil gland from a 48-million-year-old fossilized bird. In their paper published in Proceedings of ...

New fossils show ancient comb jellies had skeleton parts

July 13, 2015

(—A team of researchers with members from several institutions in China and one in the U.S. has found evidence that shows that ancient comb jellies had skeleton parts. In their paper published in the journal Science ...

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Apr 17, 2018
Even under such conditions, they note, the soft tissue was always the first thing to decay.

Well the question that immediately arises of course is whether the state of decay could be found to be the same as that which was supposedly observed by the original researchers who claimed the 520 million years age?
In other words is it not possible to establish whether in fact those researchers found something that had only died relatively recently and hence still displayed recognizable soft tissues?
This is the most glaring question that remains to be answered.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.