April 24, 2017 report
Ancient stone pillars offer clues of comet strike that changed human history
Prior evidence based on ice cores taken from Greenland has suggested that a strike by a comet may have led to the onset of the Younger Dryas—a period of Earth cooling that lasted for approximately 1000 years. Other evidence also suggests that the cooling period caused groups of people to band together to cultivate crops, leading to the development of agriculture, which in turn led to huge leaps in technological innovations and societal developments, i.e. Neolithic civilization. In this new effort, the researchers describe evidence they found on a stone pillar at Gobekli Tepe (the oldest known temple site) that aligns with the ice core findings—that a comet struck the Earth in approximately 10,950BC.
The pillar was created by the people of Gobekli Tepe and now appears to have served as a means of commemorating a devastating event—perhaps a comet breaking up and its remnants crashing into the Earth, causing an immediate environmental impact around the globe and possible loss of life (one of the characters on the pillar was of a headless human.) The team fed likenesses of the images carved onto the pillar (known as the vulture stone) into a computer to determine if they might be linked with constellations. Doing so revealed associations between characters on the pillar and astronomical symbols in the sky for the year 10,950 BC. The fact that the people took the time and considerable effort to create the characters on the pillar suggests something very important must have happened during the same time period that the Greenland ice core suggests a comet struck, approximately 10,890BC.
The researchers have concluded that the carvings on the pillar were likely meant to document the cataclysmic event and suggest that the temple may have been an observatory. They also report that they found evidence of changes to the Earth's rotational axis as a result of the comet strike.
Explore further
ABSTRACT
We have interpreted much of the symbolism of Göbekli Tepe in terms of astronomical events. By matching low-relief carvings on some of the pillars at Göbekli Tepe to star asterisms we find compelling evidence that the famous 'Vulture Stone' is a date stamp for 10950 BC ± 250 yrs, which corresponds closely to the proposed Younger Dryas event, estimated at 10890 BC. We also find evidence that a key function of Göbekli Tepe was to observe meteor showers and record cometary encounters. Indeed, the people of Göbekli Tepe appear to have had a special interest in the Taurid meteor stream, the same meteor stream that is proposed as responsible for the Younger-Dryas event. Is Göbekli Tepe the 'smoking gun' for the Younger-Dryas cometary encounter, and hence for coherent catastrophism?
© 2017 Phys.org
User comments
Considering they are searching against modern astronomical symbols invented 12,000 years later. This seems like a poorly modernized interpretation of ancient artifacts to me, in the "Ancient Aliens" style. Though, it was published in an open access peer reviewed journal, I think it will be my reading today.
We? The epic of Manas in Kyrgyzstan is a million-line poem that has been passed down orally for over a thousand years. The Hindu vedas are also passed down orally. Writing is considered suspect, like hearsay in court. They use special memorization techniques to prevent corruption of the text.
Whereas today, if your phone battery dies you can't find your way across town. I think the ancients were always more competent; the thing to upgrade is the estimate of modern arrogance.
They may be over-interpreting these pillars, but it is certainly food for thought. AFAIR, there's no convincing mega-impact site. Suggestion that the main whatsit whacked an ice-cap which has since melted back mean geologists must look harder for 'secondary' evidence.
One mythologist that I've spoken to suggested that there are no known records for either the zodiac or precession that date earlier than 500 BC.
Arguments over mythology can be similar to arguments that end up mired in statistics; it becomes a filter which winnows the conversation to a very small slice of the population. Most observers are trying to just figure out who to trust, and that game usually ends up predictably.
Notice that the Wikipedia page for "Aquarius (mythology)" supposedly ground zero for astrological interpretation, is illustrated merely by a starless man pouring water into a starless ditch. Obfuscation continues to this day.
As we've only a few 'events' to work from, like paired craters in South America from a lesser, later impact, I suppose the impactor may have broken up in the atmosphere, done a mini-version of the SL9 Jupiter impact, rather than digging one very large hole with easily found evidence...
Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more