Roman women much more independent than previously thought

May 19, 2016, Radboud University
Roman women much more independent than previously thought
Bust of Livia, wife of Emperor Augustus, paragon of a powerful, confident woman in Roman times.

The classic misunderstanding about ancient Rome is that only the men were considered citizens and the women were seen as an extension of their husband or father. Historian Coen van Galen dispels that notion. He will be defending his doctoral thesis on 30 May at Radboud University.

Although ancient Roman society was rather macho and often misogynistic, many living in the Roman Empire had more personal freedom than women in western countries in the twentieth century. Historian Coen van Galen researched why this was the case and uses his to show that Roman women played a social role as citizens and could even become the head of the family. This is a radically different perspective of the power balances in Roman society from what has been previously held by modern-day historians.

The familia

The basis of female independence lies within the peculiar Roman family structure, the familia. This was a structure in which legal adulthood didn't exist and which often did not account for .

"The head of the familia owned all the property and had the authority to make decisions," Van Galen explains. "This head was the oldest relative of the male line, who would make decisions on behalf of the entire family."

This oldest relative of the male line could be a woman, if she was the eldest child. For a long time, this made no difference for women in the legal sense. Van Galen continues: "When they married, Roman women usually became part of the husband's familia, which in a legal sense put them in the role of their husband's daughter and meant they were subordinate to them as long as he lived."

New prenuptial agreements

However, something remarkable started happening in the first century BC: more and more, marriages were held with new prenuptial agreements. These new agreements meant that the wife stayed part of her father's familia.

If her father were to pass away, she would become an independent head of the family, separate from her husband. The result was that a Roman woman would become head of the family, while her husband did not have any decision-making rights and did not own any property because his father was still alive. It was a reversal of the gender roles, with big consequences. Van Galen's research shows that women started claiming more and more space for themselves.

"It caused tension in Roman society," Van Galen explains. "There are stories of women pursuing their own careers and managing their own property." This did not fit into the traditional gender roles of Roman men and women. Some Roman men considered such an independent woman to be unacceptable: they chose not to marry and took a female slave as their partner, so they wouldn't have to share their power.

Mandatory marriage

To fight the declining number of marriages, and most importantly, to ensure that women upheld their most important duty to the Roman state, which was giving birth to children, Emperor Augustus enacted new laws. Everyone was legally obliged to marry, and the emperor rewarded women who had given birth to at least three children within the confines of a legal marriage with extra independence. Van Galen says that this measure did little to put a stop to the changes in society; it merely shows how Roman society was struggling against female independence.

Roman women themselves also struggled with their independence: legally, they had the freedom to act in their own interest, but they had to be subtle about doing so because they also had to fit the ideal of the modest and obedient woman. This is reflected in the marriage of that very same Augustus, who married the prototype of the independent woman: Livia. "Livia nicely showcases the ambivalence. She seemed to be the perfect housewife, but she actually played a central role in the Roman Empire."

Explore further: Family footwear find shows new side to Roman military

Related Stories

Family footwear find shows new side to Roman military

January 21, 2013

(Phys.org)—By looking at someone's shoes, you can tell a lot about the person wearing them. That old adage certainly rings true when looking at children's shoes from ancient Rome. Just ask Elizabeth Greene, a Classics professor, ...

Antiquity's hermaphroditus—a gender bender

December 15, 2015

The view that androgynous individuals are pathologically deviant has caused scholars to reject the possibility that the mythological figure Hermaphroditus could be perceived as erotically attractive. But the Romans had a ...

First Londoners were multi-ethnic mix: museum

November 23, 2015

A DNA analysis of four ancient Roman skeletons found in London shows the first inhabitants of the city were a multi-ethnic mix similar to contemporary Londoners, the Museum of London said on Monday.

Father-son team find Roman Briton remains

November 23, 2007

The skeleton of an ancient Roman Briton apparently with some social standing was found by two men who previously unearthed a $2 million Viking treasure.

Integration: A centuries-old issue

April 23, 2008

When can a person be regarded as a full and equal citizen of a country? Is a double nationality possible and what advantages does it offer a newcomer? These questions were already contemplated in ancient Rome. The Italian ...

Recommended for you

Study: Social media sways exercise motivation

January 17, 2019

It's January – a time when students are looking for that extra bit of oomph. For some, time spent on social media might provide the necessary inspiration to get up and exercising – but that time can come with consequences, ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vidyaguy
not rated yet May 19, 2016
Perceptions are not returning to "...as previously thought." They have never changed among perceptive individuals, except for the politically-correct-at-any-price crowd (not known for their intellect, so much as their compulsive vocalization) and its need to justify its existence (not having accomplished anything else).
Sigh
not rated yet May 20, 2016
Lets see: a man who has no "power" because his father is still alive fears that if he marries a woman he will the have to "share" his "power" - which he doesn't have.

I have an older sister. Under these laws, she would become head of the family when our father dies. Would another man marry my sister, knowing that, at some point, she would have power independent of his and so could leave him if she thought that necessary? If he worked in the family business, it would be hers at some point.

I'm betting it actually does make sense given competent articulation (which Raboud U Public Affairs Office obviously lacks proficiency in)

I'm not taking that bet.
Sheik_Yerbuti
Jul 02, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.