White dwarf with almost pure oxygen atmosphere discovered

April 1, 2016 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report
Image of Sirius A and Sirius B taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Sirius B, which is a white dwarf, can be seen as a faint pinprick of light to the lower left of the much brighter Sirius A. Image: NASA, ESA

A trio of researchers, two with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and the other with Universität Kiel has discovered something very unique—a white dwarf with an atmosphere that is made almost completely of oxygen. In their paper published in the journal Science, Kepler de Souza Oliveira, Detlev Koester and Gustavo Ourique describe how they came to discover the oddity and offer some ideas on how it might have come to exist. Boris Gänsicke with the University of Warwick offers an essay on the work by the team in the same journal issue.
White dwarfs come about, scientists believe, when a relatively 'small' star runs out of fuel, losing its outer layer as the star shrinks down due to gravity—the stronger gravitational force then usually causes the heaviest elements to be drawn towards the core pushing the lighter ones, such as helium and hydrogen to the surface. But this new white dwarf is different, the researchers report, instead of the usual mix of light elements at the surface, there is almost nothing but pure oxygen. Nicknamed Dox, the star is the first ever of any kind to be observed to have a nearly pure oxygen outer layer.

Such a phenomenon has been predicted before, but most in the field never believed that such a star would ever be observed, thus it came as quite a surprise to team member Gustavo Ourique as he poured over thousands of simple graphs made from data generated by the New Mexico observatory. It was not until further tests were run that it was confirmed that the unique graph he had found turned out to represent data from the strange white dwarf.

Though it is impossible at this point to say with any certainty what caused the unique star formation, the researchers believe it is likely tied to an earlier event—they believe that Dox may once have been one of a pair of forming a binary system, and as the other star ran out of fuel it would have become a red giant, which would perhaps have been able to interact with its partner directly. The outcome, the researchers suggest could have laid the groundwork for a later explosion that caused Dox to lose its other lighter elements, leaving mostly pure oxygen in its outer layer.

Explore further: What are the different kinds of supernovae?

More information: S. O. Kepler et al, A white dwarf with an oxygen atmosphere, Science (2016). DOI: 10.1126/science.aad6705


Researchers have discovered a white dwarf star with an atmosphere dominated by oxygen, a type of white dwarf that has been theorized to exist but not identified to date. The finding could challenge the textbook wisdom of single stellar evolution, and provide a critical link to some types of supernovae discovered over the past decade. As relatively small stars (those less than ten times the mass of our sun) near the end of their lives, they throw off their outer layers and become white dwarf stars, which are very dense. The high gravity that occurs under such density causes the lighter elements, such as hydrogen or helium, to float to the surface of the star, masking the heavier elements below. While combing through data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), Souza Oliveira Kepler et al. identified SDSS J124043.01+671034.68, a white dwarf with its outer layer of light elements stripped away, revealing a nearly pure layer of oxygen. Several different theories have predicted that the outer layer of a white dwarf can be stripped, but identification of SDSS J124043.01+671034.68 provides the first evidence of this phenomenon. One possibility is that interactions with a nearby companion in a binary star caused SDSS J124043.01+671034.68 to bare its oxygen envelope. Another possibility is that a massive pulse of burning carbon from the center of the star, emulating outwards, eliminated the lighter elements. A Perspective by Boris Gänsicke provides further context.

Related Stories

What are the different kinds of supernovae?

March 15, 2016

There are a few places in the universe that defy comprehension. And supernovae have got to be the most extreme places you can imagine. We're talking about a star with potentially dozens of times the size and mass of our own ...

Feuding helium dwarfs exposed by eclipse

May 24, 2011

Researchers at the University of Warwick have found a unique feuding double white dwarf star system where each star appears to have been stripped down to just its helium.

Can planets be rejuvenated around dead stars?

June 26, 2015

For a planet, this would be like a day at the spa. After years of growing old, a massive planet could, in theory, brighten up with a radiant, youthful glow. Rejuvenated planets, as they are nicknamed, are only hypothetical. ...

Astronomers discover new kind of supernova

March 26, 2013

(Phys.org) —Supernovae were always thought to occur in two main varieties. But a team of astronomers including Carnegie's Wendy Freedman, Mark Phillips and Eric Persson is reporting the discovery of a new type of supernova ...

Recommended for you

A new neptune-size exoplanet

December 16, 2018

The remarkable exoplanet discoveries made by the Kepler and K2 missions have enabled astronomers to begin to piece together the history of the Earth and to understand how and why it differs from its diverse exoplanetary cousins. ...

Mars InSight lander seen in first images from space

December 14, 2018

On Nov. 26, NASA's InSight mission knew the spacecraft touched down within an 81-mile-long (130-kilometer-long) landing ellipse on Mars. Now, the team has pinpointed InSight's exact location using images from HiRISE, a powerful ...

Video: Enjoying the Geminids from above and below

December 14, 2018

On the night of December 13, into the morning of December 14, 2018, tune into the night sky for a dazzling display of fireballs. Thanks to the International Space Station, this sky show – the Geminids meteor shower—will ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.4 / 5 (5) Apr 01, 2016
"...it came as quite a surprise to team member Gustavo Ourique as he poured over thousands of simple graphs..."

What did he pour over them? (The word is "pored.")
3 / 5 (6) Apr 01, 2016
"...it came as quite a surprise to team member Gustavo Ourique as he poured over thousands of simple graphs..."

What did he pour over them? (The word is "pored.")

Yep, that's some rather poor journalism.
4.2 / 5 (5) Apr 01, 2016
Also (a personal peeve) that the star is "very unique".

There aren't any degrees of uniqueness - by definition something either is, or it is not, unique. Lots of people do this; that doesn't make it right.
5 / 5 (6) Apr 01, 2016
The abstract at the DOI link is different from the abstract above. It mentions that no hydrogen or helium were observed, and that the next most abundant elements in the white dwarf's atmosphere were neon and magnesium ("lower by a factor of ≥25 by number"). It also points out that oxygen, neon, and magnesium are the products of carbon burning. It concludes with, "This star, a possible oxygen-neon white dwarf, will provide a rare observational test of the evolutionary paths toward white dwarfs."
Enthusiastic Fool
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 02, 2016

I think your narrow view isn't particularly useful. Say we find a new species of therapod that has 6 digits on its forelimb(vice 3 or 4). That species is a unique species in that it's differentiated from all other therapods by 1 characteristic. Now say we find a therapod that has 3 eyes, a set of wings, and breathed fire. That would be very unique in that it has more unique characteristics relative to the population of therapods as a whole. The more characteristics you can use to differentiate a thing from other things the more unique it is. Every star we find is unique in a variety of characteristics but some stars deviate from the model of stellar evolution more than others.
See the usage bit here: http://www.dictio...iqueness
1 / 5 (2) Apr 02, 2016
As can be expected human knowledge is sand tower. Without the help of our Creator our outlook and knowledge will remain extremely limited. It is physically imposible to get more knowledge from the Earth. But humanists must maintain the myth of endless human passiblities of the proud denied their Creator.
Mr Som-o
5 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2016

"Keep moving, folks. There's nothing to see here."
not rated yet May 27, 2016
@Enthusiastic Fool
Firstly, apologies, I hadn't seen your post-in-reply until a few minutes ago.

...Say we find a new species of therapod that has 6 digits on its forelimb(vice 3 or 4). That species is a unique species.... Now say we find a therapod that has 3 eyes, a set of wings, and breathed fire. That would be very unique...
See the usage bit here: http://www.dictio...iqueness

I disagree: species 1 is unique and species 2 is unique. (Actually, that is part of the purpose of "species" as a taxonomic term.) And I believe that your dictionary link also supports my argument? There are numerous other terms that can denote what you suggest but few terms that denote "the one and only of its type" so I think there's a place for "unique" that shouldn't be subverted.

I agree that the language evolves; that doesn't mean I have to go along with what seems a semantic violation (Latin: unicus). Perhaps we should simply agree to disagree?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.