Explainer: What is antimatter?

January 26, 2016 by Roger Jones, Lancaster University, The Conversation
There’s evidence that antimatter is produced in thunderstorms. Credit: Thomas Bresson/Flickr, CC BY-SA

Antimatter was one of the most exciting physics discoveries of the 20th century. Picked up by fiction writers such as Dan Brown, many people think of it as an "out there" theoretical idea – unaware that it is actually being produced every day. What's more, research on antimatter is actually helping us to understand how the universe works.

Antimatter is a material composed of so-called antiparticles. It is believed that every particle we know of has an antimatter companion that is virtually identical to itself, but with the opposite charge. For example, an electron has a negative charge. But its antiparticle, called a positron, has the same mass but a positive charge. When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate each other – disappearing in a burst of light.

Such were first predicted by British physicist Paul Dirac when he was trying to combine the two great ideas of early modern physics: relativity and quantum mechanics. Previously, scientists were stumped by the fact that it seemed to predict that particles could have energies lower than when they were at "rest" (ie pretty much doing nothing). This seemed impossible at the time, as it meant that energies could be negative.

Dirac, however, accepted that the equations were telling him that particles are really filling a whole "sea" of these lower energies – a sea that had so far been invisible to physicists as they were only looking "above the surface". He envisioned that all of the "normal" energy levels that exist are accounted for by "normal" particles. However, when a particle jumps up from a lower energy state, it appears as a normal particle but leaves a "hole", which appears to us as a strange, mirror-image particle – antimatter.

Despite initial scepticism, examples of these particle-antiparticle pairs were soon found. For example, they are produced when cosmic rays hit the Earth's atmosphere. There is even evidence that the energy in thunderstorms produces anti-electrons, called positrons. These are also produced in some radioactive decays, a process used in many hospitals in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners, which allow precise imaging within human bodies. Nowadays, experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) can produce matter and antimatter, too.

What is antimatter?
Experimental area at CERN including the alpha experiment. Credit: Mikkel D. Lund/wikimeda, CC BY-SA

Matter-antimatter mystery

Physics predicts that matter and antimatter must be created in almost equal quantities, and that this would have been the case during the Big Bang. What's more, it is predicted that the laws of physics should be the same if a particle is interchanged with its antiparticle – a relationship known as CP symmetry. However, the universe we see doesn't seem to obey these rules. It is almost entirely made of matter, so where did all the antimatter go? It is one of the biggest mysteries in physics to date.

Experiments have shown that some radioactive decay processes do not produce an equal amount of antiparticles and particles. But it is not enough to explain the disparity between amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe. Consequently, physicists such as myself at the LHC, on ATLAS, CMS and LHCb, and others doing experiments with neutrinos such as T2K in Japan, are looking for other processes that could explain the puzzle.

Other groups of physicists such as the Alpha Collaboration at CERN are working at much lower energies to see if the properties of antimatter really are the mirror of their matter partners. Their latest results show that an anti-hydrogen atom (made up of an anti-proton and an anti-electron, or positron) is electrically neutral to an accuracy of less than one billionth of the charge of an electron. Combined with other measurements, this implies that the positron is equal and opposite to the charge of the electron to better than one part in a billion – confirming what is expected of antimatter.

However, a great many mysteries remain. Experiments are also investigating whether gravity affects antimatter in the same way that it affects matter. If these exact symmetries are shown to be broken, it will require a fundamental revision of our ideas about physics, affecting not only particle physics but also our understanding of gravity and relativity.

In this way, experiments are allowing us to put our understanding of the fundamental workings of the universe to new and exciting tests. Who knows what we will find?

Explore further: Neutral result charges up antimatter research

Related Stories

Neutral result charges up antimatter research

January 20, 2016

Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today in the prestigious journal ...

Protons and antiprotons appear to be true mirror images

August 12, 2015

In a stringent test of a fundamental property of the standard model of particle physics, known as CPT symmetry, researchers from the RIKEN-led BASE collaboration at CERN have made the most precise measurements so far of the ...

LHCb experiment observes new matter-antimatter difference

April 24, 2013

(Phys.org) —The LHCb collaboration at CERN today submitted a paper to Physical Review Letters on the first observation of matter-antimatter asymmetry in the decays of the particle known as the B0s. It is only the fourth ...

Recommended for you

Camera able to capture imagery of an optical Mach cone

January 23, 2017

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers at Washington University in St. Louis has built a camera apparatus capable of capturing moving imagery of an optical Mach cone. In their paper published in the journal Science Advances, ...

Experiment resolves mystery about wind flows on Jupiter

January 23, 2017

One mystery has been whether the jets exist only in the planet's upper atmosphere—much like the Earth's own jet streams—or whether they plunge into Jupiter's gaseous interior. If the latter is true, it could reveal clues ...

Melting solid below the freezing point

January 23, 2017

Phase transitions surround us—for instance, liquid water changes to ice when frozen and to steam when boiled. Now, researchers at the Carnegie Institution for Science have discovered a new phenomenon of so-called metastability ...

17 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Seeker2
5 / 5 (2) Jan 27, 2016
Thanks. Think I am on my way to understanding the Dirac Sea for the first time.
swordsman
1 / 5 (3) Jan 27, 2016
If there is anti-matter discovered, it won't be around long, since it will be repelled by matter.
Phys1
4 / 5 (8) Jan 27, 2016
If there is anti-matter discovered

You missed the Nobel prize of 1936.
, it won't be around long,

Correct. It quickly annihilates.
since it will be repelled by matter.

So you are correct by coincidence, not by understanding.
Positrons are not repelled by electrons but attracted by them.
Phys1
3.4 / 5 (5) Jan 27, 2016
Thanks. Think I am on my way to understanding the Dirac Sea for the first time.

The idea of the Dirac sea, though inspiring, is flawed.
A hole in a sea of electrons can never have a symmetry relation to an electron.
And where are the positive charges to stabilise the electron sea?
Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2016
A hole in a sea of electrons can never have a symmetry relation to an electron.
So is +1 symmetrical to -1?
Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2016
And where are the positive charges to stabilise the electron sea?
There is some interesting speculation about that at
http://qz.com/596...entists/
Phys1
4 / 5 (4) Jan 27, 2016
A hole in a sea of electrons can never have a symmetry relation to an electron.
So is +1 symmetrical to -1?

Antisymmetrical. I wrote "symmetry relation" for that reason.
Phys1
3.4 / 5 (5) Jan 27, 2016
And where are the positive charges to stabilise the electron sea?
There is some interesting speculation about that at
http://qz.com/596...entists/

Look. The Dirac sea was thought up to explain the positive charge of the positron.
But to stabilise the Dirac sea positive background charge are needed.
So the concept fails. Not every thought of Dirac is physics.
Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2016
Look. The Dirac sea was thought up to explain the positive charge of the positron.
But to stabilise the Dirac sea positive background charge are needed.
So the concept fails. Not every thought of Dirac is physics.
I looked but I didn't find any reference to stability.
Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2016
A hole in a sea of electrons can never have a symmetry relation to an electron.
So is +1 symmetrical to -1?

Antisymmetrical. I wrote "symmetry relation" for that reason.
So the hole is asymmetrical to the electron? Careful how you use the term anti. I've been called out on it several times when I used it with time.
Phys1
3.4 / 5 (5) Jan 28, 2016
You have called out not for the use of the prefix "anti" but for talking undefined crackpottery.
Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 28, 2016
Good coverup.
Phys1
3 / 5 (4) Jan 28, 2016
Paranoid ?
bluehigh
5 / 5 (1) Jan 28, 2016
It quickly annihilates. - a simpleton.


So, a lump of anti-lithium collides with a hydrogen gas cloud. What remains after your annihilation? There's not enough electronic (atomic) interaction to eliminate all the 'particles'.

Make it deeper. A lump of anti-carbon drifts slowly into a cloud of water.

What remains? Let's see. The C4 state eliminates (annihilates) all the H2. The O2 is ionised. The remaining single Oxygen atoms as ozone glow in the dark? The resulting energetic plasma sequesters the unbound Neutrons from any remaining degenerate Carbon isotopes and ...

Then an interstetter wind blows in a bit more water.

It's all so simple, right?

Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 28, 2016
Work on your sentence structure.
Phys1
3 / 5 (4) Jan 28, 2016
You just wrote "Good coverup." ? How about that for an incomplete English phrase with spelling mistake?
So, paranoid ?
Seeker2
5 / 5 (1) Jan 28, 2016
Stick to dense aether theory.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.