Changes in land use pose greater threat than climate change to biodiversity of rivers and streams

May 19, 2015, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum
Changes in land use pose the greatest threat to the species diversity in streams and rivers. Credit: Senckenberg

For the first time, scientists at the Senckenberg Research Center for Biodiversity and Climate and the Research Institute Senckenberg in Gelnhausen have modeled the effects of land use changes on the species diversity in rivers and streams. Their results show that the loss of biodiversity is caused to a significantly higher degree by changes in land use practices than by climate change. In consequence, conservation concepts for this valuable ecosystem and the organisms that live in flowing water should be adapted accordingly. The study was recently published in the scientific journal Freshwater Biology.

From their source to the mouth, rivers and streams are in constant motion and count among the world's most dynamic ecosystems. Although they only cover a small percentage of the land area, in their natural state these ecosystems are home to a multitude of living organisms: insects, fish, algae, bivalves and daphnias are but a few of the denizens of streams and rivers. "At the same time, however, rivers and streams are the most endangered ecosystems on a global scale," according Dr. Mathias Kuemmerlen from the Department of Freshwater Ecology and Nature Conservation Research at the Research Institute Senckenberg in Gelnhausen. He adds, "Rivers and streams are more sensitive to environmental changes than any other biotope."

Together with colleagues from China and Germany, the biologist from Gelnhausen studied the rivers and streams in a catchment area of approx. 1,700 square kilometers in Southern China, which is part of the drainage basin of the Yangtze River. "For the first time, we modeled a future projection of the in connection with land use changes," explains Dr. Sonja Jähnig, who conducts research at the Leibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries in Berlin and who initiated this study. She adds, "The loss of biodiversity is often studied in relation to . Other important anthropogenic impacts on the environment – such as changing land use practices – are frequently neglected in this context."

Therefore, the team of scientists around Kuemmerlen modeled three scenarios for the development of freshwater-dwelling macroinvertebrates – animals without a vertebral column easily recognized with the naked eye – for the years from 2021 until 2050: the climate change, the change in land use, and a combined climate change and land use change scenario. "Our results will help us to better understand future changes in the invertebrate communities," according to Jähnig.

Damselflies (Zygoptera) are typical inhabitants of rivers and streams. Credit: Senckenberg

The 72 aquatic organisms that were studied display a wide range of different behaviors in the models. Thus, in the course of land use changes, the aquatic stonefly Togoperla sp. stands to lose 85 percent of its distribution area in the studied drainage basin and is locally threatened with extinction, while damselfly species of the family Protoneuridae gain an additional 9 percent of potential habitat. "In all of our models, there are 'losers' and 'winners,' both in the land use and . However, across all species, it can be said that the changes in land use have the strongest negative effect on the species diversity in rivers and streams – in this model, the local biodiversity decreased by 20 percent," explains Kuemmerlen.

In the scientists' models, the effect of climate change on the biodiversity in rivers and is only of secondary importance. According to Kuemmerlen, "There is a close interaction between flowing water and the landscapes in the . Therefore, the species diversity is strongly affected by land use practices." In addition, the modeling results show that the combined effect of changes in land use and climate may lead to a general decrease in local species diversity. Moreover, a shift in the distributions of many aquatic invertebrates can be expected.

Although changing land use practices, e.g., the clear-cutting of forests for agricultural use, represent the most obvious change within an ecosystem, according to Kuemmerlen this factor is frequently neglected in the development of conservation concepts. "In order to preserve the species diversity, we must consider both changes in climate as well as in land use," he summarizes.

Explore further: Deforestation threatens species richness in streams

More information: "An attack on two fronts: predicting how changes in land use and climate affect the distribution of stream macroinvertebrates." Freshwater Biology. DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12580

Related Stories

Deforestation threatens species richness in streams

December 18, 2014

With a population of 1.3 billion, China is under immense pressure to convert suitable areas into arable land in order to ensure a continued food supply for its people. Accordingly, China is among the top countries in the ...

Major study shows biodiversity losses can be reversed

April 2, 2015

Most people would probably agree that human pressures on the land are bad news for wildlife. Practices such as agriculture can introduce pollutants to the environment, force out wildlife, and change local ecosystems forever.

Plight of imperiled Montana insect draws lawsuit

April 16, 2015

Wildlife advocates asked a judge Wednesday to force federal officials to decide if a rare aquatic insect that's found only in Montana's Glacier National Park should be protected under the Endangered Species Act.

Recommended for you

NASA's Mars 2020 rover is put to the test

March 20, 2019

In a little more than seven minutes in the early afternoon of Feb. 18, 2021, NASA's Mars 2020 rover will execute about 27,000 actions and calculations as it speeds through the hazardous transition from the edge of space to ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet May 19, 2015
Hey, it is the right of money-men to "develop" that "wasted" land into profitable parking lots, nail salons, and game stores.

Who owns this nation, . . Capitalism or Mother Nature? Stick around for the uncomfortable answer.
not rated yet May 19, 2015
"In all of our models, there are 'losers' and 'winners,' both in the land use and climate change scenarios."

Look everyone, a real scientist!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.