Education secretary says he backs annual testing

January 12, 2015 byKimberly Hefling
Education Secretary Arne Duncan speaks about the administration's priorities for education, Monday, Jan. 12, 2015, at Seaton Elementary in Washington. Duncan said that testing U.S. schoolchildren annually in math and reading is critical for measuring their educational progress, setting the stage for what is likely to be a contentious Capitol Hill debate on the federal role in education. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Foreshadowing what could be a contentious battle with Congress, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Monday that rolling back federal testing requirements in math and reading would deprive students, parents and their schools of critical information needed to measure educational progress.

Duncan chose the 50th anniversary of President Lyndon Johnson's introduction of a landmark education equity bill to make the Obama administration's case for continued testing. Civil rights groups and state education chiefs also have voiced support for it.

"I believe parents, and teachers and students have both the right and the absolute need to know how much progress all students are making each year towards college and career readiness," Duncan said.

He said that too many 16- and 17-year-olds find out too late they aren't prepared for college, and "those days must be over."

The No Child Left Behind education law, signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002, requires children to be tested in reading in math in grades three through eight and once in high school.

With Republicans newly in charge of both houses of Congress, Senate education Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., has said his top priority is fixing the law, which expired in 2007. His first hearing is expected next week with a focus on testing. Both he and House education Chairman John Kline, R-Minn., have said the federal government needs to get out of the business of deciding what to do about low-performing schools, education standards and teacher evaluations.

Alexander said in a statement that the committee expects to send a bill to the Senate early this year. "My goal is to keep the best portions of the original law and restore to states and communities the responsibility for deciding whether teachers and schools are succeeding or failing," he said.

Duncan acknowledged that there are places where tests—and test preparation—take up an excessive amount of time. He urged Congress to provide money to states to improve the quality of their tests and to have states set limits on time spent on standardized testing.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan speaks about the administration's priorities for education, Monday, Jan. 12, 2015, at Seaton Elementary in Washington. Duncan said that testing U.S. schoolchildren annually in math and reading is critical for measuring their educational progress, setting the stage for what is likely to be a contentious Capitol Hill debate on the federal role in education. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

As he laid out a case for equity in education, Duncan said he's "deeply concerned about where some Republicans are headed."

No Child Left Behind requires schools to show annual growth in student achievement or face consequences. It has been credited with putting a focus on how schools handle minority, low-income, English learners and special needs students, but also has led to complaints that teachers were teaching to standardized tests and that mandates were unrealistic and penalties ineffective. Beyond the federal requirements, many districts and states require other standardized tests.

Since 2012, President Barack Obama has allowed states to get a waiver from some of the more stringent requirements of the law, but they had to agree to requirements such as implementing teacher evaluation systems with teeth.

There's been widespread agreement that the comprehensive law needs to be fixed, but disagreement over how to do it.

The National Education Association, a teachers union, wants Congress to adopt a federal requirement that students be tested just once in elementary, middle and high school. "Parents and educators know that the one size fits all annual federal testing structure has not worked," NEA President Lily Eskelsen García said in a statement. She said states and districts should be given flexibility in deciding how to use testing to identify achievement gaps.

On Sunday, a coalition of 20 civil rights groups said a top priority with the reauthorization is continuing the federal annual testing mandate.

"The reason is simple: Kids who are not tested end up not counting," said Kati Haycock, president of the Education Trust.

The Council of Chief State School Officers said it supports annual testing because "every parent has a right to know how their child is performing academically in public school."

Testing also has been an issue because of the role it can play in teacher evaluations. Last year, Duncan said states can apply for extra time before they use student test scores to judge educators' performance.

Another factor is that millions of students this spring for the first time will take new Common Core-based assessments.

Several states and districts already are reviewing the quality and quantity of tests given.

Speaking at Seaton Elementary School in a historically African-American neighborhood, Duncan said that Obama's proposed budget will include $2.7 billion for enhanced programs under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

Explore further: Urban schools improving faster than rest of US

Related Stories

Urban schools improving faster than rest of US

December 18, 2013

Federal testing data shows that public school students in the nation's largest cities are improving their performance in reading and math faster than their counterparts in suburban and rural schools.

Kansas won't release data from reading, math tests

July 8, 2014

Kansas won't be issuing any report cards this year on how well its public school students performed on standardized reading and math tests after cyberattacks and other problems this spring.

Bilingual education has spillover effect

September 10, 2013

Bilingual education programs have a substantial spillover effect on the students they're not designed for, according to a groundbreaking study co-authored by a Michigan State University scholar.

Recommended for you

University choice and achievement partly down to DNA

October 18, 2018

Research from King's College London has shown for the first time that genetics plays a significant role in whether young adults choose to go to university, which university they choose to attend and how well they do.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

24volts
not rated yet Jan 12, 2015
One problem I see with this is not every kid is bound for college or even wants to go to one. Nor do all jobs require a college education. If you think they do next time your plumbing breaks down call an accountant.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.