# Football physics and the science of Deflategate

News reports say that 11 of the 12 game balls used by the New England Patriots in their AFC championship game against the Indianapolis Colts were deflated, showing about 2 pounds per square inch (psi) less pressure than the 13 psi required by the rules, so it seems that the most bizarre sports scandal of recent memory is real. But there are still plenty of questions: why would a team deflate footballs? Could there be another explanation? And most importantly, what does physics tell us about all this?

For New England fans, the first priority is a search for an innocent explanation. After all, party balloons and car tires deflate during cold winter weather, so might a simple temperature difference be responsible for the change in inflation ?

The physics principle known as the ideal gas law tells us that a reduction in temperature leads to a reduction in pressure. The pressure of a confined gas multiplied by its volume is proportional to the number of molecules in the gas multiplied by the temperature. Maybe you remember the equation PV=nRT from your schooldays. So if you cool a gas while keeping its volume fixed, the pressure must decrease.

But we don't need equations to check this: we can demonstrate it directly. I got a couple of old footballs from Union College's athletic department, pumped them up and popped them in the freezer. After a night in the cold, the pressure was around 2psi lower, just like the Patriots' footballs—from about 19psi at the start (I slightly overinflated the balls by using the tire pump in my car) down to about 17 psi.

Of course, the temperature difference involved was a little extreme—from about 68F in my office, down to about -10F in the freezer. So, you can use to produce the pressure change seen by investigators, but the temperature required would've matched the legendary Ice Bowl of 1967. Last Sunday's game was played in pouring rain at about 50F, so unless they did the pre-game testing of the balls in a sauna, or the post-game investigation in a meat locker, thermodynamics alone can't get the Patriots off the hook.

Assuming that the balls really were deliberately deflated, then what would be the reasoning? Would the lower pressure make the ball lighter and more aerodynamic, allowing longer, more accurate passing?

This is another question easily answered with the ideal gas law—the volume of a football doesn't change very much with pressure, so deflating it by 2psi requires reducing the amount of gas inside by about 15%. But air is, by definition, very light. The air in a fully inflated football accounts for only about 10 grams of its mass (about 2.5% of the total) and deflating it would reduce that by maybe a gram or two. (This also explains why the officials didn't notice anything funny during the game—the change in weight from the missing air is too small to notice, particularly in bad weather, where rain probably added more to the mass of the ball than the deflation took away.)

And again, we have experimental confirmation of this—a 2006 episode of the TV show Mythbusters replaced the air inside a football with helium to see if that would allow a kicker to boot the ball father. The mass reduction of swapping helium for air is far greater than that for a 2psi reduction in pressure, but the Mythbusters found no gain in performance—in fact, air-filled balls might be slightly better, as the extra mass makes them somewhat less susceptible to air resistance.

In the end, the reason for deflating a owes more to physiology than physics. A slightly deflated ball is a bit softer, making it easier to grip the ball to throw it and reducing the bounce when it hits the hands of a receiver, making it easier to catch. We can see this even with frozen footballs—although the cold makes the leather stiffer, the balls had noticeably more give when squeezed than before they went in the freezer. In cool, rainy conditions, where the ball becomes wet and slippery, this works to the advantage of the quarterback and receivers.

The most puzzling aspect of the story, though, is the scoreboard. The Patriots won the game 45-7, thoroughly outplaying the Colts in every aspect of the game. The tiny advantage they may have gained from a better grip on the ball can't explain such a lopsided outcome. If the Patriots were that much better, why risk punishment by tampering with the footballs?

That question, alas, isn't one the ideal gas law can answer. For that, you would need to understand the psychology of Patriots coach Bill Belichick, and that is a mystery much too deep for physics.

Explore further

Winter-like temps can reduce tire pressure

This story is published courtesy of The Conversation (under Creative Commons-Attribution/No derivatives).

Feedback to editors

## User comments

Jan 23, 2015
Football statistics can supply another piece of the puzzle. Slate has an article up which is pretty interesting.

http://www.slate....les.html

Patriots fumbles per play are way, way off of the bell curve for the rest of the league. Whatever they are doing to minimize fumbles, it's working really well. (It's even more extreme for fumbles resulting in a turnover.)

Deflated balls are easier to hold onto. But of course that isn't the only possible approach to minimizing fumbles.

Slate notes that the proper comparison to make is the Patriots versus the other teams which do not have domes at home. Dome-possessing clubs never have to content with wet balls at home and therefore have lower rates of fumbles on average. Even so, the Patriots are competitive with the best of the dome-possessing clubs, and they beat the open stadium clubs by a country mile.

Jan 24, 2015
Did the author use a calibrated instrument when measuring pressure? Did he make allowances for altitude? Barometric pressure? CO2 and particulate levels?< /tongue-in-cheek>

There's some peculiar aspect to professional sports that inspires the incessant collection of data. And inspired use of statistics.

Jan 24, 2015
This issue is compounded by an apparent poorly understood calibration system.
If the tolerance is going to +/- .5 psi, do the gauges have the precision, are the initial conditions well documented? Are gauges calibrated?

Jan 28, 2015
What about the actual material the football is made out of- the pigskin?
Obviously the air inside the ball isn't a vacuum, and heat will transfer itself, so what about the process of the air passing in and out of the football itself? I mean, I would think it's kind of like a squeaky toy- you squeeze the toy, but there's a hole in it, and the material of the toy allows it to expand again.
So, how many of the Patriots' balls were USED when they tested them? Just like everyone said, Brady likes softer balls to throw, the RBs and WRs don't fumble as much.
All those balls were squeezed- and squeezed HARD during the game by guys who are jacked out of their minds with muscle.
Which leads me to believe...when they inflated the balls before the game, they were at the lower limit of PSI. They were used during the game by BIG dudes playing football. It was cold outside. Then they only measured the balls AFTER the game.
I would bet the 1 ball that wasn't under the limit, was the least used.

Jan 30, 2015
If the football is measured right after inflating it, the air inside will still be warm from being compressed. While the football itself expands during the pumping, leather is not that stretchy so if the pumping is done rapidly it will be near-adiabatic compression and the air inside will be much warmer than room temperature.

Thus the Patriots might have gamed the system by using a fast pump right before taking the footballs to be measured, and this would be consistent with Brady's carefully worded answers since it would not violate the rules.

Regarding the experiment int this article, experiment only trumps theory if all of the variables are accounted for - this experiment did not take into account the rain dampening the footballs. Leather softens when wet, allowing the football to stretch a bit further under the pressure and thus relieving a bit of the pressure. And yes, dtox86, manhandling would increase the stretching of wet leather.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more