Activists urge EU to scrap science advisor job

August 19, 2014
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso gives a press conference on July 16, 2014 at the EU Headquarters in Brussels

Nine major charities urged the European Commission on Tuesday to scrap a science advisor position it says puts too much power over sensitive policy into the hands of one person.

The position of Chief Scientific Advisor was created in 2011 by Commission head Jose Manuel Barroso and given to Professor Anne Glover, a British biologist who activists accuse of backing the cultivation of genetically modified food crops, a hugely controversial practice in key EU member states.

In an open letter to Jean-Claude Juncker, who replaces Barroso in November, the groups criticised the post as "fundamentally problematic as it concentrates too much influence in one person, and undermines in-depth scientific research and assessments carried out by or for the Commission directorates in the course of policy elaboration".

The fight over the development of GM is one of the fiercest debates in the European Union, pitting environmentalists and backers of small-scale farming against the international agri-business lobby that defends the technology as a way to boost crop yields and create rural jobs.

Signatories to the letter included Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, the Health & Environment Alliance and the Alliance for Cancer Prevention.

Some of these groups have also been critical of the Commission's stance on biofuels and shale gas extraction.

In the letter, the groups warned that re-appointing a science advisor "is not the way for the Commission to ensure that scientific evidence informs its policymaking; rather it creates additional problems".

"Vested interests have long realised that the more you concentrate scientific advice into the hands of one person, the easier it is to control," it added.

In May, European business lobbyists came out strongly in favour of Professor Glover and maintaining the position.

"We see the CSA as a key proponent in science-based decision-making to make the important role of science more visible in the EU institution," BusinessEurope said in a letter to Barroso.

Since taking office, Glover has rarely spoken publically in order, she has said, to remain out of the political fray and continue to hold potentially challenging positions on sensitive issues.

Explore further: Europe must improve its response to the threat of plant pests and diseases

Related Stories

EU freezes approval of GM crops to 2014

January 22, 2013

The European Commission has decided to freeze the approval process for genetically modified food crops through the end of its mandate next year while it works towards an agreement with EU member states.

EU ex-health commissioner to challenge ouster

October 24, 2012

Former EU health commissioner John Dalli on Wednesday vowed to issue a legal challenge to Brussels following his forced resignation over a tobacco-linked influence-peddling fraud probe.

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Ultra-sharp images make old stars look absolutely marvelous

March 21, 2019

Using high-resolution adaptive optics imaging from the Gemini Observatory, astronomers have uncovered one of the oldest star clusters in the Milky Way Galaxy. The remarkably sharp image looks back into the early history of ...

When more women make decisions, the environment wins

March 21, 2019

When more women are involved in group decisions about land management, the group conserves more—particularly when offered financial incentives to do so, according to a new University of Colorado Boulder study published ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Aug 20, 2014
These guys are no different than climate deniers - they think science is only valid when it matches their preconceived world view. Protip - science doesn't give two craps about your political or economic agenda and is only concerned with finding actual reality.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 20, 2014
The systematical research of GMO and CCD connection is missing. The systematical research of GMO and autoimmmune diseases connection is missing. The systematical research of GMO and cancer connection is missing - actually no study of long-term toxicity of GMO are longer than nine months. Every attempt for longer study is attacked with Monsanto under legal threat. One doesn't need to be very clever for to recognize, there is smelling something.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.