Climate: Farming emissions to rise 30 percent by 2050

April 11, 2014
Dairy cows eat after being milked on July 20, 2012 near Whiteland, Indiana

Greenhouse gases emitted by agriculture are on track to rise by 30 percent by mid-century, driven especially by livestock and use of fertiliser, a UN agency reported on Friday.

"Global agricultural emissions are projected to increase in 2030 and 2050 by 18 percent and 30 percent respectively," the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) said in a report issued in Rome.

Annual emissions by mid-century will be more than 6.3 billion tonnes of equivalent (CO2eq), a standardised measure of carbon gas, it said.

Looking at the period from 2001 to 2011, emissions from crop and livestock production rose by 14 percent, the FAO said.

The biggest source in this sector was "enteric fermentation"—methane emitted in flatulence and belching by livestock—which accounted for 39 percent of the sector's total output of greenhouse gases. These emissions rose by 11 percent between 2001 and 2011.

Another big contributor was man-made fertiliser, which accounted for 13 percent of agricultural emissions in 2011—a rise of more than a third since 2001.

Asia accounted for 44 percent of agricultural emissions in 2011, followed by the Americas (25 percent), Africa (15 percent), Europe (12 percent) and Oceania (four percent).

Rice paddies, by generating methane through biological processes, account for 10 percent of total agricultural emissions, while the burning of savannah grasslands accounts for five percent.

Over the decade, emissions of greenhouse gases from land use change and deforestation fell by nearly 10 percent.

Around a seventh of of come from the farm sector, previous estimates have said.

Explore further: Livestock is major contributor to global warming: UN

Related Stories

Oil seed can slash CO2 emissions in farming by 13%

March 25, 2014

According to the initial results of EU-funded research the use of rapeseed cake in the production of livestock feed can cut methane and carbon dioxide emissions by up to 13%. This is the preliminary finding of a study carried ...

CO2 emissions 'increased at slower rate in 2012'

October 31, 2013

The world's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions increased at a slower rate in 2012—1.1 percent compared to a 2.9 percent annual increase over the past decade, a report said Thursday.

UN panel shows who's responsible for CO2 emissions

April 11, 2014

The U.N.'s expert panel on climate change is preparing a new report this weekend outlining the cuts in greenhouse gases, mainly CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels, required in coming decades to keep global warming in check.

Lots of carbon dioxide equivalents from aquatic environments

March 24, 2014

Large amounts of carbon dioxide equivalents taken up by plants on land are returned to the atmosphere from aquatic environments. This is the conclusions from a study carried out by two students at Linköping University, Sweden.

Recommended for you

People waste nearly a pound of food daily: study

April 18, 2018

Americans waste nearly a pound of food per person each day, but the exact amount of food we trash differs by how healthy your diet is, a new University of Vermont co-authored national study finds.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (4) Apr 11, 2014

"Moreover, both of its bands occur at wavelengths where H2O is already absorbing substantially. Hence, any radiation that CH4 might absorb has already been absorbed by H2O. The ratio of the percentages of water to methane is such that the effects of CH4 are completely masked by H2O. The amount of CH4 must increase 100-fold to make it comparable to H2O."
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Apr 12, 2014

if you are going to push an issue, use real science, not some hack site

if you have a gripe, and there is legitimate science supporting it, why not post relevant data from studies/publications that are reputable? why do you keep posting from crank sites or blogs? it does NOTHING to support your argument...

look, its real simple. you don't believe in the science... so, PROVE IT WRONG!
but use REAL SCIENCE to do it, not some crazy hack or some bog sites. if it is legitimate then there will be reputable supporting evidence out there.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.