Europe's rollercoaster carbon prices set to hit Australia

April 17, 2013 by Liz Minchin, The Conversation
The price of Australian carbon permits is set for a steep drop after 2015 when it links to Europe’s fluctuating emissions market. Credit: Flickr/PaulSteinJC

Australia's key strategy to tackle climate change is looking shaky, after another price drop on the world's biggest carbon market raised fresh doubts about the future of emissions trading schemes.

In Europe, the price of carbon permits plunged after the narrowly voted against a plan to delay the sale of 900 million new permits to pollute, which would have reduced a massive of permits that has undermined the scheme's effectiveness.

Australia and Europe's carbon prices will start to be linked from mid-2015, under a deal announced last year by the Gillard government that will allowing full trading between the Australian and European markets no later than July 2018.

That means the success or failure of Australian is closely linked to what happens in Europe – and experts say the signs are not looking good.

Minister Greg Combet said next month's budget will include revised revenue forecasts, factoring in the lower European prices, though he would not provide details.

"We'll continue with our plans to link with the from the July 1, 2015, which is still over two years away, but this year's budget will include a revised forecast for a carbon price in 2015-16 in Australia," he told the ABC today.

Earlier this year, the Australian Financial Review revealed that the is facing a revenue hole of up to $4 billion in 2015-16, due to the likelihood of future carbon prices being much lower than originally forecast.

Riding the European rollercoaster

The European emissions trading scheme covers 31 countries and more than 11,000 power stations and industrial plants, which need permits to emit large amounts of carbon dioxide.

The value of emissions permits has been on a rollercoaster ride since the EU scheme's , from a high in 2006 of €30 for a permit to produce a tonne of , crashing only a year later to just €1 a tonne.

Immediately after yesterday's European vote, the permit price dropped 40 per cent to €2.55 (A$3.25) a tonne of emissions, later recovering to €3.15 (A$4.00).

In contrast, Australia's current fixed price is A$23 per tonne of emissions. That is set to rise to A$25.40 in July 2014 – estimated to raise around A$8 billion that financial year – and then the permit price is likely to plummet once the price starts being set by the market from 2015.

"For Australia, this means that we too effectively will not have a carbon emissions scheme of any significance once we join up with the Europeans in two years time," said Paul Frijters, a Professor of Economics at the University of Queensland.

"The 'good news' is that joining up will hardly cost the country anything, as the only real effect of joining was for Australia to fund the governments of Europe (a kind of development aid from the former colony).

"The bad news is that our own tax receipts are going to be negligible. The price per tonne is going to be closer to A$2 per tonne, rather than the A$27 per tonne the Australian Treasury so foolishly had been counting on."

Professor Frijters, who warned against Australia linking to Europe's scheme in an article for The Conversation last year, said the Australian Treasury had made a serious mistake by relying on "the politically-motivated projections" of the European Commission.

Fixing a budget black hole

The Grattan Institute's Energy Program Director, Tony Wood, also criticised the Treasury and the federal government for relying on unrealistically high carbon price estimates.

"The black hole in the budget is a consequence of fixing a compensation package [for Australian industry and households] on the basis of a particular forecast of prices, which was always going to be wrong.

"It does illustrate why policies dependent on a particular forecast are very dangerous indeed."

But Mr Wood said that there are ways that European and Australian governments could increase the market prices for carbon permit, if there was the political will to do it.

For instance, he said that the Climate Change Authority is in the process of reviewing future climate and emission targets for Australia, and was likely to be factoring in what was happening in Europe.

"The current Australian emissions reduction target is 5 per cent by 2020, which is not consistent with our longer-term goal of an 80 per cent reduction by 2050.

"Setting emission targets that are more in line with what the science says we need to do to avoid a 2 degree Celcius temperature rise would help tighten up the availability of emission permits, which affects price, and mean we were doing more to address climate change."

In the meantime, Mr Wood joked: "I'm glad I don't have my superannuation tied up in the European right now."

Explore further: Australia to link with EU carbon scheme from 2015

Related Stories

Australia sets carbon price to fight climate change

July 10, 2011

Australia Sunday announced plans to tax carbon pollution at Aus$23 (US$24.74) per tonne to help battle climate change, as it moves towards an emissions trading scheme similar to that of Europe.

Australia brings in contentious carbon tax

July 1, 2012

Australia on Sunday introduced a controversial carbon tax in a bid to tackle climate change, with Prime Minister Julia Gillard hailing the move amid opposition warnings it will stifle industry.

Recommended for you

2.7-million-year-old ice core pulled from Antarctica

August 21, 2017

A team of researchers from Princeton University, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the University of Maine and Oregon State University has drilled and retrieved a 2.7-million-year-old ice core from a spot in Antarctica. ...

Hot spot at Hawaii? Not so fast

August 18, 2017

Through analysis of volcanic tracks, Rice University geophysicists have concluded that hot spots like those that formed the Hawaiian Islands aren't moving as fast as recently thought.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.5 / 5 (8) Apr 17, 2013
A farcical joke created to gift wrap the AGW lie for the chosen few and all sinisterly formulated to drive the rest into poverty. If it weren't so funny I would be crying.
The Singularity
1.7 / 5 (6) Apr 17, 2013
Carbon Trading = Convoluted rubbish
2.3 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2013
This troller coaster ride isn't much of a thrill, not with the same old posts from the same old contrarians.
2 / 5 (2) Apr 18, 2013
There is only one practical solution to the problem of pollution from burning Coal , and that is nuclear fission.
France successfully gets 75% of its electricity from nuclear plants and in the process they have saved billions of tons of coal from being burnt needlessly.

The biggest failure is the windmill and solar model which doesn't work and is a complete failure since the countries involved just build coal plants to compensate for the Solar and windmill lack of reliability.
1 / 5 (3) Apr 18, 2013
This troller coaster ride isn't much of a thrill, not with the same old posts from the same old contrarians.

And with that post, you epitomize your role of AGW Alarmist Troll.
5 / 5 (1) Apr 18, 2013
It is funny to see all these Republican Denialists badmouthing the market based solution to the CO2 problem that Republican Economists designed and Republicans originally insisted upon.

Some might think that the only reason they proposed the solution was to deny it later.

3 / 5 (2) Apr 21, 2013
The USA is the only country in the world not signed up to carbon limits, even as their cities are signing on.
There is a lot of denial propaganda from the tobacco, sorry, coal lobby.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.