Peering into a gateway opened 50 years ago

March 17, 2013 by Amina Khan
An X-ray image of the quasar PKS 1127-145, located about 10 billion light-years from Earth. Credit: NASA.

Saturday marked the 50th anniversary of the discovery of the quasar - an extremely bright object powered by matter falling into a super-massive black hole lying in the heart of a galaxy.

First found in 1963, these strange sources of initially stumped astronomers: They shone as sharply and intensely as , but they appeared to be moving away from Earth far too fast to be in our own Milky Way. Scientists called them quasi-stellar radio sources - or quasars for short.

Eventually, astronomers realized that only a black hole had enough power to produce such bright light from such mind-boggling distances. Compared to faint galaxies, these cosmic beacons offered a tantalizing glimpse into the very - and thus, a window into its evolution.

California Institute of Technology astronomer Maarten Schmidt discovered the first known quasar, 3C273, on March 16, 1963. He spoke with the about his groundbreaking discovery.

Question: What was it like to discover such a strange new phenomenon?

Answer: It was really exciting. These quasars - they were so unexpected. It was, I must say, the highlight of my own science in my career.

Q: A "bright spot," you might say.

A: Yup.

Q: How did you come across that first quasar, 3C273?

A: The radio astronomers after were producing catalogs of radio sources that were quite reliable. Usually these radio sources were identified with galaxies. 3C273 was one of the first ones where the identification was not with a galaxy. We believed it originally to be a star.

Q: So you measured the object's , which tells you how much the light from an object is getting stretched out as the object travels away from you. What did this show?

A: Redshifts are just a measure of distance in the universe. High redshifts mean large distances.

If the object were a star, it would have to be in our own galaxy, of course. And the stars in our galaxy have a velocity never larger than 600 kilometers per second - that would be a redshift of 0.2 percent. If a star has a velocity larger than that, it would escape the galaxy. Anything that has a redshift of even 1 percent has to be outside the galaxy.

But when I took a spectrum in 1962 and also in 1963, it turned out that it was redshifted by 16 percent. That corresponds to a velocity off 47,000 kilometers per second.

Q: That's a lot faster.

A: Yes! So it really stood out, and it could not be ignored.

Q: If this strange object was sitting billions of light-years away, how could you see it?

A: It was 40 times more luminous than an entire galaxy of 100 billion stars. It was an exceptional object.

Q: Did you realize it was in the center of another galaxy?

A: No. These quasars occur in the center of , but are so incredibly bright that they masked the whole galaxy. That took a long time to establish.

Q: Were you surprised by your own conclusions?

A: Absolutely. My wife still tells me I was pacing the floor in the evening and couldn't stop.

At times we thought we were just barking up the wrong tree, but you look at the observations again, and what other explanation could we give?

Q: How did the discovery of quasars change the way we viewed the universe?

A: It allowed us to go back easily in time. For instance, after a number of years I concluded that the number of quasars in the universe had been much larger in the past than it is now, by a factor of 100. And it was the first case where we saw the universe was changing.

This is the evolution of the universe, as it were.

Q: Fifty years later, do we see the universe differently because of quasars?

A: The universe before used to be a rather quiet place - at least, that's what the astronomers thought. And it turned out that all sorts of things are happening.

As some people later on said, it's a violent .

Explore further: Astronomers find universe's most distant quasar (w/ video)

More information: This interview has been edited for clarity.

Related Stories

Astronomers find universe's most distant quasar (w/ video)

June 29, 2011

( -- A team of European astronomers has used ESO’s Very Large Telescope and a host of other telescopes to discover and study the most distant quasar found to date. This brilliant beacon, powered by a black ...

Galaxy 'hunting' made easy

September 14, 2007

Astronomers using ESO's Very Large Telescope have discovered in a single pass about a dozen otherwise invisible galaxies halfway across the Universe. The discovery, based on a technique that exploits a first-class instrument, ...

Astronomers discover new way to measure Universe

September 27, 2011

( -- Astronomers at Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute have found a new way to measure distances. This may not sound like much, but working out how far away something is, is one of the toughest fundamental problems ...

Extremely rare triple quasar found

March 12, 2013

( —For only the second time in history, a team of scientists—including Carnegie's Michele Fumagalli—have discovered an extremely rare triple quasar system. Their work is published by Monthly Notices of the ...

Merging galaxies create a binary quasar (w/ Video)

February 3, 2010

Astronomers have found the first clear evidence of a binary quasar within a pair of actively merging galaxies. Quasars are the extremely bright centers of galaxies surrounding super-massive black holes, and binary quasars ...

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Mar 17, 2013
I must say quasars are what really got my interest in astronomy raging. i had a few old books from the 70's before they knew what they actually were that fascinated me when i was young. then going online and finding out what progress had been made...i was hooked.
1 / 5 (2) Mar 18, 2013
Has the red shift ruler been calibrated? What can affect it's calibration?
It has been suggested by Marmon that light loses energy at right angles to it's path in the 1200 meter wavelength when it encounters protium.
If this were the case then the amount of energy seen would be orders of magnitude lower than calculated, because the object would be nearer.
The question is "Is the red shift relied on as a matter of faith and groupthink prevents the questioning of it?"
5 / 5 (3) Mar 18, 2013
Has the red shift ruler been calibrated? What can affect it's calibration?

Modifications to the base measurements can have an influence, see the recent report in on a new measurement of the distance to the LMC for example.

It has been suggested by Marmon that light loses energy ...

Tired light was suggested by Zwicky in 1929.

The question is "Is the red shift relied on as a matter of faith and groupthink prevents the questioning of it?"

Everything is questioned. Here is the answer:

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.